Recherche avancée

Syntaxe: "", OU, ET, EXACT(), /p, /s, /n
(AAAA ou AAAA-MM ou AAAA-MM-JJ)
Trier par : Pertinence Date

2,515 résultat(s)

  • 1,801.

    Bulletin du 13 novembre 2009 - 2009-11-13

    Bulletins

    Dean Peroff, Chris MacLeod and H. Scott Fairley for the intervener National Council for the Protection of Canadians Abroad.

  • 1,802.

    Bulletin du 11 juillet 2008 - 2008-07-11

    Bulletins

    3. D. Atlantic Inc., carrying on business as Treasures, Scott Kurtzman, Anna Wrzosek and Jeffrey Burnett, et al. v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Ontario, et al.

  • 1,803.

    Childs c. Desormeaux - 2006 CSC 18 - [2006] 1 RCS 643 - 2006-05-05

    Jugements de la Cour suprême
    Responsabilité civile

    Barry D. Laushway, Scott Laushway et Beth Alexander, pour les appelants.

  • 1,804.

    Bulletin du 19 mars 2004 - 2004-03-19

    Bulletins

    William Patrick Thomson, Allen Scott Hamilton, Elizabeth Ann Craft and Alpha Charolotte Drunken Chief

  • 1,805.

    Bulletin du 26 octobre 2001 - 2001-10-26

    Bulletins

    (Scott C.J.M., Twaddle and Helper JJ.A.) Appeal dismissed June 7, 2001

  • 1,806.

    Bulletin du 27 avril 2001 - 2001-04-27

    Bulletins

    Scott B. Stewart Stewart & Company FILING DATE 10.4.2001 Her Majesty the Queen

  • 1,807.

    Bulletin du 19 novembre 1999 - 1999-11-19

    Bulletins

    Yvette Scott et al. Kristopher H. Knutsen, Q.C. Carrell & Partners

  • 1,808.

    Bulletin du 14 mai 1999 - 1999-05-14

    Bulletins

    Randall Scott Echlin Borden & Elliot v. (27193) Jim Epoch (Ont.)

  • 1,809.

    Chartier c. Chartier - [1999] 1 RCS 242 - 1999-01-28

    Jugements de la Cour suprême
    Droit de la famille

    35 De la même façon, dans Miller c. Miller (1988), 13 R.F.L. (3d) 80, à la p. 83, le juge Scott de la Cour suprême de l’Ontario s’est exprimé ainsi sur cette question:

  • 1,810.

    Bulletin du 8 mai 1998 - 1998-05-08

    Bulletins

    Scott Hutchison and Alex Alvaro, contra. DISMISSED / REJETÉE NATURE OF THE CASE

  • 1,811.

    Bulletin du 29 mars 1996 - 1996-03-29

    Bulletins

    Scott K. Fenton, for the appellant. Timothy E. Breen, for the respondent.

  • 1,812.

    R. c. Plant - [1993] 3 RCS 281 - 1993-09-30

    Jugements de la Cour suprême
    Droit constitutionnel

    Robert Scott Plant Appelant c. Sa Majesté la Reine Intimée Répertorié: R. c. Plant

  • 1,813.

    Commonwealth of Puerto Rico c. Hernandez - [1975] 1 RCS 228 - 1973-10-29

    Jugements de la Cour suprême
    Droit criminel

    [TRADUCTION] ...que les membres de la Cour étaient tous d’avis que la Cour n’était pas compétente, le refus du Juge en chef Scott n’étant pas, suivant la définition de l’al. d) de l’art. 2, un jugement au sens de l’art. 41 de la Loi sur la Cour suprême.

  • 1,814.

    McKay et al. v. The Queen - [1965] SCR 798 - 1965-06-24

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Droit constitutionnel

    Solicitors for the appellants: Cameron, Brewin, McCallum & Scott, Toronto.

  • 1,815.

    John M.M. Troup Ltd. et al. v. Royal Bank of Canada - [1962] SCR 487 - 1962-06-11

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Droit constitutionnel
    Priorités et hypothèques

    Among the authorities on which the appellants rely in support of this argument are the case of Minneapolis‑Honeywell Regulator Co. Ltd. v. Empire Brass Mfg. Co. Ltd.[8], and the following passage in Scott on Trusts, 2nd ed., vol. 3, pp. 2231 and 2232:

  • 1,816.

    International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Therien - [1960] SCR 265 - 1960-01-26

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Droit du travail

    JJ.A. Both of these learned judges expressed the view that such a union was by virtue of these statutes of the province an entity distinct from its members or, as expressed by Robertson J.A., adopting what had been said by Scott L.J. in National Union of General and Municipal Workers v. Gillian[9], a perona juridica.

  • 1,817.

    The Municipality of the City and County of Saint-John et al. v. Fraser-Brace Overseas Corporation et al. - [1958] SCR 263 - 1958-04-01

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Droit fiscal
    Droit international

    Fraser-Brace Overseas Corporation, Terminal Construction Company, Limited and J. A. Jones Construction Company, doing business under the name and style of Fraser-Brace-Terminal Constructors; and Johnson, Drake & Piper International Corporation, and Merritt, Chapman & Scott Corporation, doing business under the name

  • 1,818.

    Niles et al. v. Lake - [1947] SCR 291 - 1947-02-04

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Fiducie

    In Russell v. Scott[8], it was held that there was a presumption of a resulting trust in favour of an aunt who had opened a joint account with her nephew but, at the death of the aunt, the nephew was allowed to claim the balance of the account, because it was found that the presumption of any resulting trust in favour of

  • 1,819.

    Lister v. McAnulty - [1944] SCR 317 - 1944-06-22

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Droit international

    Solicitors for the respondent: MacDougall, McFarlane, Scott & Hugessen.

  • 1,820.

    Lewis v. Nisbet & Auld Ltd. - [1934] SCR 333 - 1934-04-24

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Droit du travail

    We were referred to British Columbia Mills Co. v. Scott[20], Wood v. Can. Pac. Ry. Co.[21], and other cases in this court and in Ontario in support of the proposition which it was contended was laid down in Walsh v. Whiteley[22], but all these cases will be found, in so far as they concern the question of injuries caused by

  • 1,821.

    Gordon v. Hebblewhite - [1927] SCR 29 - 1927-01-04

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Priorités et hypothèques

    W. L. Scott K.C. for the respondent. The judgment of the court was delivered by

  • 1,822.

    The Town of Cobalt v. The Temiskaming Telephone Company - (1919) 59 SCR 62 - 1919-06-02

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Droit municipal

    H.J. Scott K.C. for the respondent. IDINGTON J.—The question raised herein is whether or not respondent, which is a telephone company incorporated under and by virtue of the Ontario “Companies Act,” has, under the circumstances I am about to refer to, the right to maintain on the public highways of appellant, which is a

  • 1,823.

    Stone v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co. - (1913) 47 SCR 634 - 1913-05-06

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Transport

    Co. v. McDougall[4]; Marney v. Scott[5]; and the jury have found that such duty was not observed in this case.

  • 1,824.

    The City of Vancouver v. The Canadian Pacific Railway Co. - (1894) 23 SCR 1 - 1894-02-20

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Législation

    See Hardcastle on Statutes[9]; The Queen v. Scott[10]; The Queen v. Morris[11]; Galloway v. Mayor of London[12].

  • 1,825.

    Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. Vogel - (1886) 11 SCR 612 - 1886-03-09

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Transport

    The Dominion Act 34 Vic. cap. 43 sec. 5, was passed with the obvious intention of restricting the power of railway companies contracting themselves free from liability for loss however caused, which act the Ontario courts in Scott v. Great Western Ry.[18] and Allan v. Great Western Ry.[19] decided did not apply to railways