Recherche avancée
- toutes les collections (4,780)
- Décisions (2,367)
- Ressources (2,169)
4,780 résultat(s)
-
3,826.
Pejepscot Paper Co. Et al. v. Farren - [1933] SCR 388 - 1933-05-08
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit des biens
In the certificate, the name of David’s father is given as William Fitzgerald. [...] See Freeman v. Phillips[16]; also the judgments of Sir C. Cresswell, Wightman, J. and Williams, J., in Shedden v. Attorney-General[17], and particularly the following dictum of Williams, J.:—
-
3,827.
M. D. Donald Ltd. v. Brown - [1933] SCR 411 - 1933-04-26
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit fiscal
In 1929, Mrs. Meltzer, Mr. William Meltzer and Mrs. Schwartz entered into an agreement to sell this property to a purchaser for $210,000. [...] In the note, however, it is observed that a contrary view is expressed in Lewin on Trusts and concurred in by the eminent property lawyer, Mr. Joshua Williams, in his Law of Real Property, as well as by others.
-
3,828.
Reference as to the effect of the Exercise by His Excellency the Governor General of the Royal Prerogative of Mercy upon Deportation Proceedings - [1933] SCR 269 - 1933-03-29
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]État
J. Shirley Denison K.C. and R. D. Williams contra. The judgment of the court was delivered by
-
3,829.
City of Halifax and Kitz v. Hyland - [1933] SCR 317 - 1933-02-07
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit fiscal
On the morning of July 6, 1929, the last day for redemption, the plaintiff’s son, William Hyland, went to the City Hall.
-
3,830.
Asbestos Corporation Ltd. v. Cook - [1933] SCR 86 - 1932-12-23
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Contrat
William A. Cook (Plaintiff) Respondent. 1932: May 19; 1932: December 23.
-
3,831.
SCR | RCS [1932] - 1932-10-11
Recueil des arrêts de la Cour suprême du CanadaJ. D. Bissett K.C. for the respondent, Trustee of the estate of John William Drummond, deceased. [...] In the case of Williams v. Wilcox (1), Lord Denman observed: (1) (1838) 35 E C.L.R. 609, at 620. [...] Solicitors for the respondent: Williams, Manson, Gonzales & Taylor. 1931 *Oet.26, 27.
-
3,832.
Canadian Electrical Association et al. v. Canadian National Rys. Et al. - [1932] SCR 451 - 1932-03-31
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Transport
We think our conclusion is also supported by the decision of the Judicial Committee in Grand Trunk Pacific Railway Company v. The Landowners on streets in Fort William[9]. [...] In that case, the Board of Railway Commissioners ordered that the railway company might construct its line of railway along certain streets through the city of Fort William.
-
3,833.
Arrow River & Tributaries Slide & Boom Co. Ltd. v. Pigeon Timber Co. Ltd. - [1932] SCR 495 - 1932-03-15
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Services publics
Sir William Hearst K.C. and W.I. Hearst for the appellant. H.F. Parkinson K.C. for the respondent.
-
3,834.
Lady Davis v. The Royal Trust Co. Et al. - [1932] SCR 203 - 1932-03-01
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Appel
The Right Honourable Lord Shaughnessy (William James Shaughnessy), of the city and district of Montreal, Alexander M. Reaper, of the city and district of Montreal, and Lady Davis (Dame Eleanor Curran), of the city and district of Montreal, widow of the late Sir Mortimer Barnet Davis, Knight, all three in their quality of
-
3,835.
Royal Bank of Canada v. Mack - [1932] SCR 488 - 1932-03-01
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Institutions financières
William Mack (Plaintiff) Respondent 1931: October 14, 15. 1932: March 1
-
3,836.
Royal Bank of Canada v. MacKenzie - [1932] SCR 524 - 1932-03-01
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Priorités et hypothèques
The plaintiff, who sued on behalf of himself and the other creditors of the estate of William McLennan, deceased, attacked the validity of a chattel mortgage made by the said McLennan to the defendant bank; and also attacked the validity of a security purporting to be given by said McLennan to the bank under the provisions [...] SMITH J.—One William McLennan, now deceased, had a sheep ranch in the vicinity of Suffield in the province of Alberta, and made a chattel mortgage dated 20th December, 1929, to the appellant, to secure $9,500 and interest on chattels described as follows:
-
3,837.
Bertrand et al. v. Warré et al. - [1932] SCR 364 - 1932-02-02
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Tribunaux
All questions affecting the judgment can therefore be discussed by the parties and may now be considered (A. R. Williams Machinery Co. Ltd. v. Moore[2]).
-
3,838.
Maytag et al. v. Rural Municipality of Hanover et al. - [1932] SCR 298 - 1932-02-02
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit municipal
One is that laid down by Vaughan Williams, L.J., in Groves v. Lord Wimborne[5], where his Lordship says:—
-
3,839.
Price v. B.C. Motor Transportation Ltd. and Ledbury - [1932] SCR 310 - 1932-02-02
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Responsabilité civile
B.C. Motor Transportation Limited and William Ledbury (Defendants) Respondents. [...] The injuries received by Price resulted from a collision between a 29 passenger bus belonging to the respondents the B.C. Transportation Limited, driven by the respondent William Ledbury, and a Star touring car driven by Price.
-
3,840.
City of Vancouver v. Burchill - [1932] SCR 620 - 1932-01-15
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Transport
Solicitor for the appellant: J.B. Williams. Solicitors for the respondent: Beck & Grimmett.
-
3,841.
Glesby v. Mitchell - [1932] SCR 260 - 1931-12-22
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Contrat
And even in such cases, this court would be entitled, before granting a motion to quash under section 38, to reserve the motion until after hearing the merits of the appeal, in order to see, “that a case for the exercising of the judge’s discretion has been raised by the evidence.” See Williams v. Guest[26].
-
3,842.
O'Connor v. Waldron - [1932] SCR 183 - 1931-12-22
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Responsabilité civile
William Francis O’Connor (Plaintiff) Appellant; and Gordon Waldron (Defendant) Respondent.
-
3,843.
Industrial Acceptance Corp. Ltd. and Canadian Acceptance Corp. Ltd. v. Canada Permanent Trust Co. / In re Smith and Hogan, Ltd. - [1931] SCR 652 - 1931-11-09
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Faillite et insolvabilité
We agree with the view expressed by Ritchie, C.J., and Strong, J., in In re Sproule[4], that where “jurisdiction is conferred on a judge in chambers a right to revise his decision is impliedly conferred on the court unless there is something in the subject matter or context leading to a contrary conclusion.” In Williams v. [...] Authorities giving effect to this view are cited in the judgment of Taschereau, C.J., in Williams’ case[6] and need not be reproduced here. [...] But Williams’ case6 should not be regarded as governing cases in which the judge in chambers has granted an application for leave to appeal in disregard of some essential statutory condition of the right of the applicant to have his application for leave heard and passed upon.
-
3,844.
SCR | RCS [1931] - 1931-11-09
Recueil des arrêts de la Cour suprême du CanadaWilliam McNeil tried this day on a charge of shop breaking by night with intent. [...] That the rates on grain and flour from all points on Canadian Pacific branch lines west of Fort William to Fort William, Port Arthur and Westport be equalized to the present Canadian Pacific main line 36334-21 [...] Solicitors for the appellant: Aikins, Loftus, Aikins, Williams & MacAulay.
-
3,845.
The King v. Fares et al. - [1932] SCR 78 - 1931-11-09
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Services publics
William Henry Fares, Alexander Smith and Smith & Fares, Limited (Suppliants) Respondents.
-
3,846.
McNichol v. Grandy - [1931] SCR 696 - 1931-10-26
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Responsabilité civile
Solicitors for the appellant: Aikins, Loftus, Aikins, Williams & MacAulay.
-
3,847.
Government of Alberta v. Can. Nat. Rys and Pac. Ry. Co. - [1931] SCR 656 - 1931-10-06
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Transport
1. That the rates on grain and flour from all points on Canadian Pacific branch lines west of Fort William to Fort William, Port Arthur and Westport be equalized to the present Canadian Pacific main line [...] all such traffic moving from all points on all lines of railway west of Fort William to Fort William or Port Arthur over all lines now or hereafter constructed by any company subject to the jurisdiction of Parliament. [...] As to rates from points west of Fort William to Vancouver and Prince Rupert, we do not interpret the questions submitted as intending to cover them.
-
3,848.
Hutchison v. The Royal Institution for the Advancement of Learning - [1932] SCR 57 - 1931-10-06
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Contrat
The boy served the full term, and the plaintiff sued the defendant upon the last of the I.O.U's. It was held by Willes, J. and Byles, J., Williams, J. dissenting, that the circumstances of the indenture being void by the 39th section of 8 Ann. c. 9, for not truly setting forth the consideration, did not prevent the
-
3,849.
Preferred Accident Ins. Co. of New York v. Vandepitte - [1932] SCR 22 - 1931-10-06
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Assurance
A word upon Williams v. Baltic Insurance Association of London[4]. There the action was brought by the named insured; and ratification by the beneficiary before the accident occurred brought the case within the scope of Lord Campbell's judgment in Waters' case[5].
-
3,850.
In re Estate of J.W. Drummond, Deceased / Benn v. Hawthorne et al. - [1932] SCR 73 - 1931-06-23
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Successions
In the Matter of the Estate of John William Drummond, Deceased. W.D. Benn (Plaintiff) Appellant; [...] J.D. Bissett K.C. for the respondent, Trustee of the estate of John William Drummond, deceased. [...] Hamilton Cassels for the respondents Edith A. Werden, Albert D. Werden, and William A. Werden (children of Hester Amelia Werden, deceased, a daughter of John William Drummond, deceased).