Recherche avancée
- toutes les collections (4,780)
- Décisions (2,367)
- Ressources (2,169)
4,780 résultat(s)
-
4,526.
Stephens v. McArthur - (1891) 19 SCR 446 - 1891-11-16
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Législation
Williams Treatise on Bankruptcy (4), published in 1884, as having considerably shaken the rules laid down informer cases as applicable to fraudulent preferences.
-
4,527.
Dawson v. Dumont - (1891) 20 SCR 709 - 1891-11-06
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Appel
Where is there the evidence of record that Mr. William McD. Dawson had authorized his brother to retain the ser-vices of an attorney for him ? [...] There was therefore originally no authority to enter appearance for "William McD. Dawson. [...] The conversation might have been and probably was a series of objections on the part of Mr. William McD. Dawson.
-
4,528.
Heward v. O'Donohoe - (1891) 19 SCR 341 - 1891-06-22
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit des biens
In that suit a decree was made on the 5th October, 1866, whereby it was in short substance and effect declared and adjudged that the said Francis Heward was seized of the legal estate in fee in the said land in trust as to one-eighth part thereof to the use of each of his brothers named respectively William B. Heward, John [...] Upon the 30th June, 1868, the master reported among other things that he had divided the lands in the decree mentioned and that he had set apart four-eighth parts by metes and bounds for Francis Heward and the remaining four-eighths parts by metes and bounds for Francis Heward’s three brothers William B. Heward, John D.
-
4,529.
Lynch v. The Canada North-West. Land Co. / South Dufferin v. Morden / Gibbins v. Barber - (1891) 19 SCR 204 - 1891-06-22
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit constitutionnel
William Gibbins (Defendant) Appellants And Barbara Barber (Plaintiff)
-
4,530.
Moodie v. Jones - (1891) 19 SCR 266 - 1891-06-22
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Contrat
" Considérant que la propriété en question a été ven° due à William "W. Proud pour le bénéfice du défendeur et d'autres personnes dont les dits J. C. Hamilton et Thomas C. Jones ne faisaient point parties et que si le montant payé par le dit J. C. Hamilton a été employé à payer partie du prix de la vente à Proud, il a été
-
4,531.
Owens v. Bedell - (1891) 19 SCR 137 - 1891-06-22
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit civil
Obligation dated. 4th June 1884, A. Gr. Isaacson N. P. from William Wilson to Thomas and William Owens hypothecating official No. 1633, St. Ann Ward, [...] A deed of hypothec for $3,000 and interest at 6 per cent, from William Wilson to Melvin Smith executed before Isaacson, N.P., on the 8th August, 1881, and registered on the 10th of August following, against the property in question in this cause. [...] 1. Hypothèque de $3,000 avec intérét à 6 pour cent, constituée Par William, Wilson en faveur de Melvin Smith, par acte passé par devant Isaacson, notaire, le 8 avrll 1881, et enregistrée le 10 avril suivant, sur la propriété en question en cette cause.
-
4,532.
Ross v. Hannan - (1891) 19 SCR 227 - 1891-06-22
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Vente
The plaintiff, present appellant, by his declaration alleged that on the 9th of April 1886, he through William Fuller, sold the defendants 1642 boxes of cheese, then stored on Fuller's premises, at 101⁄2 cents a pound, cash on delivery; that defendant selected, examined and set apart the cheeses, ordered a large number to [...] Les seules questions qui lui ont été faites out rapport à l'agence de William Hannan avec qui Fuller a négocié cette vente. [...] La preuve de l'appelant consiste dans le témoignage de Fuller qui déclare que William Hannan, agissant pour l'intimé, convint d'acheter 1643 boites de fromage de l'intimé à raison de 101⁄2 cts la livre, le fromage devant être pes1⁄2 et le montant du prix établi avant la livraison.
-
4,533.
Lamb v. Cleveland - (1891) 19 SCR 78 - 1891-05-12
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Législation
that administration of the goods of his deceased wife must be granted to the husband and to no one else; and in Cox v. Webb[21], the same point precisely, and that this was not like the case of two in equal degree, was adjudged in the Kings' Bench, in the 6th year of William and Mary in the time of Holt Chief Justice. [...] who succeeded in his contention it is entitled to the greatest weight, and in Fortre v. Fortre[25], in the 4th year of William and Mary, it was adjudged by the whole court, Sir John Holt C.J., that the ecclesiastical court may grant administration to the widow or to the next of kin of an intestate, which they please.
-
4,534.
Williams v. The City of Portland - (1891) 19 SCR 159 - 1891-05-12
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit municipal
Williams v. The City of Portland, (1891) 19 SCR 159 Supreme Court of Canada [...] Williams v. The City of Portland (1891) 19 SCR 159 Date: 1891-05-12 [...] Edward Williams and Alice S. Williams, his wife (Plaintiffs) Appellants
-
4,535.
Martin v. Moore - (1891) 18 SCR 634 - 1891-03-11
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Appel
Charles William Martin (Defendant) Appellant; and James Stewart Moore (Plaintiff) Respondent.
-
4,536.
SCR | RCS (1891) vol 18 - 1891-03-11
Recueil des arrêts de la Cour suprême du CanadaAND 1890 WILLIAM FARWELL et al. ès-qual. ~ (DEFENDANTS) RESPONDENTS. *June 12. [...] A.— Yes. Q.—Have you William Macdougall's permission-to use it in this way ? [...] WILLIAMS There is no ground whatever shewn for reforming BALFOUR. the mortgage.
-
4,537.
Accident Ins. Co. Of North America v. McLachlan - (1891) 18 SCR 627 - 1891-02-26
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Appel
WILLIAM McLACHLAN et al (PLAINTIFFS) Respondents. 1890: Nov. 19; 1891: Feb. 26 [...] John S. McLachlan, William McLachlan, Francis W. Radford and Thomas Brophy as members of a firm doing business in Montreal under the name of Mc-Lachlan Brothers & Co. The plaintiffs alleged that by the policy the appellants undertook to pay, within ninety days after the death of any one of the persons named, to the [...] At the date of the policy, plaintiffs' exhibit No. one, did the defendants know that the only persons registered as interested in the firm of Mc-Lachlan Brothers & Co. were William and John S. McLachlan ?
-
4,538.
Gray v. Coughlin - (1891) 18 SCR 553 - 1891-01-19
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Priorités et hypothèques
The foregoing conclusion results from the cases of Forbes v. Jackson[22] and re Kirkwood[23], which, following Bowker v. Bull[24], have overruled the earlier cases of Williams v. Owen[25] and Farebrother v. Wodehouse[26].
-
4,539.
Price v. Mercier - (1890) 18 SCR 303 - 1891-01-19
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Procédure civile
Le même jour 11 fut permis à Jenkins Williams, Ecr., soliciteur-général, vu le décès d'Alexandre Gray, procureur-général, de reprendre l'instance an nom de Sa Majesté. [...] Le 11 mars 1881 l'honorable Louis Olivier Taillon procureur-général de la province de Quebec, obtint de la cour Supérieure la permission de reprendre l'instance en cette cause en remplacement de Jenkins Williams.
-
4,540.
Gilmour v. Magee - (1890) 18 SCR 579 - 1890-12-11
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Louage
An action was brought to recover possession of a cellar on the corner of Queen and Canal streets in the city of Ottawa, by Charles Magee, the owner of the property and the respondent in this case who, in September, 1882, verbally leased to one William McCaffrey, the premises in question, for a term to expire on November [...] tenure or occupation of William McCaffrey for the sum of $93.25 being rent due to me for the same on the 15th June, 1888, and for the purpose aforesaid distrain all such goods of the said William McCaffrey wheresoever they shall be found as have been carried off said premises but are liable by law to be distrained,” etc.
-
4,541.
Hobbs v. Ontario Loan and Debenture Co. - (1890) 18 SCR 483 - 1890-12-10
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Louage
That seems to me to be the true proposition and the true principle of the law which is laid down Ex parte Williams10. [...] The dicta in this case of Ex parte Williams are broad enough to cover the law as laid down in the subsequent decisions. [...] This is what the clause expresses, although, of course, a question as to its validity upon the ground of the objection taken in ex parte Williams would be still open.
-
4,542.
Molson Bank v. Halter - (1890) 18 SCR 88 - 1890-12-10
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Législation
per Lord Cottenham; Williams v. Nixon[38], per Lord Langdale; Booth v. Booth[39], Lincoln v. Wright[40], which related to executors.
-
4,543.
Green v. Citizens Insurance Co. - (1890) 18 SCR 338 - 1890-12-09
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Arbitrage
The judgment of Williams J. has been generally received as a correct statement of the law and was expressly approved in the case of Dinn v. Blake[26]. [...] And in that case Williams J. says: This provision of the statute was intended merely to introduce into every order of reference the clause familiarly known as “Mr. Richards’ clause.” [...] I find the remarks of Williams J., to which I have adverted, quoted by Brett J. in Dinn v. Blake[56] as if immediately addressed to the question of referring back an award.
-
4,544.
Morin v. The Queen - (1890) 18 SCR 407 - 1890-12-09
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit criminel
I have already referred to the position taken by Williams J, The other six based their opinion on a different line of argument, the strong point of which was that the statute while it authorised the court to reverse confirm or amend the judgment. gave no power to order a new trial or a venire de novo. [...] ordered in 1861, by a court composed of five judges, all of whom had taken part in Mellor's case Pollock C.B. delivering the judgment of the court, and the other judges, including Channel B. and Williams J. concurring.
-
4,545.
Williams v. Balfour - (1890) 18 SCR 472 - 1890-12-09
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Priorités et hypothèques
Williams v. Balfour, (1890) 18 SCR 472 Supreme Court of Canada Williams v. Balfour, (1890) 18 SCR 472 [...] A. Williams, James a. Van-Wart and P. Slaven (Defendant.) Appellants [...] As neither of the appellants Williams or Slaven signed this bond its existence does not affect them.
-
4,546.
Archibald v. Hubley - (1890) 18 SCR 116 - 1890-11-10
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Vente
namely; The said Andrew Hubley, $100, Benjamin Hubley $400, Thomas Ritchie (interest $45, city taxes and water rates now $38), Gordon and Keith $12, Doctor Cowie $60, John McLearn $8.35, R. N. McDonald $12.16, Williams and Manual $14.40, Hessian and Devine, $4.10, and the balance, if any, to the said Charles L. Eaton."
-
4,547.
Godson v. Toronto (City) - (1890) 18 SCR 36 - 1890-11-10
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit municipal
The only person named in the resolution, as being subjected as a party to the inquiry required to be instituted by “the judge” is an officer of the corporation, William Lackie, into whose conduct, as inspector in relation to the particular matters specified in the resolution, the inquiry is directed.
-
4,548.
MacDougall v. The Law Society of Upper Canada - (1890) 18 SCR 203 - 1890-11-10
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit professionnel
William MacDougall (Plaintiff) Appellant; and The Law Society of Upper Canada (Defendant) Respondent. [...] of Frank Macdougall & Napoleon Belcourt; that the Hon. William MacDougall had nothing whatever to do with the firm; that he had nothing to to with the firm’s business at all; that the profits of the business are shared between Mr. Belcourt and himself; that William Macdougall’s name appeared on the business card of [...] Q.—Have you William Macdougall’s permission to use it in this way? A.—In this instance, no.
-
4,549.
SCR | RCS (1890) vol 17 - 1890-11-04
Recueil des arrêts de la Cour suprême du Canada196 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA. [VOL. XVII. 1888 WILLIAM PARTLO (PLAINT IFF)..... ..... [...] The land had belonged_to William Holland a brother of John. William died in 1882, before the month of July. [...] I know John Holland, of Halifax, a brother of William Holland, deceased.
-
4,550.
Creighton v. The Halifax Banking Co. - (1890) 18 SCR 140 - 1890-10-29
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit commercial
2. Where the proceeds of the note appropriated by the plaintiff bank, at the request of William Esson, to the payment of the indebtedness of Esson & Co. to the plaintiff bank? [...] 4. Had the plaintiff bank, at the time this note was discounted, notice that William Esson had no authority to sign the name of the firm of S. Creighton & Co. to this note? [...] 6. Had the firm of S. Creighton & Co. ever given authority to William Esson or the firm of Esson & Co. to sign notes for them in the management of the business of the firm of S. Creighton & Co.?