Recherche avancée
- toutes les collections (4,780)
- Décisions (2,367)
- Ressources (2,169)
2,367 résultat(s)
-
2,001.
Glengoil SS. Co. v. Pilkington / Glengoil SS. Co. v. Ferguson - (1897) 28 SCR 146 - 1897-12-09
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit maritime
WILLIAM PILKINGTON AND OTHERS (PLAINTIFFS) Respondents. THE GLENGOIL STEAMSHIP CO. AND ROBERT GRAY (DEFENDANTS) [...] WILLIAM FERGUSON AND OTHERS (PLAINTIFFS) Respondents. 1897: Oct 12; 1897: Oct 13; 1897: Oct 14; 1897: Dec 9
-
2,002.
Haggert v. Brampton (Town) - (1897) 28 SCR 174 - 1897-12-09
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Priorités et hypothèques
Henderson v. Williams[7]; [Page 178] Blakely v. Dooley[8]; Auger v. Cook[9].
-
2,003.
In re Central Bank of Canada - (1897) 28 SCR 192 - 1897-12-09
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit commercial
the present Chief Justice, Sir William Meredith, then solicitor of the liquidators in the liquidation matter; that it was revised by the learned Chancellor, and so revised was introduced into Parliament and passed, and that the Master in Ordinary, before whom the proceedings in liquidation were conducted, had urged the
-
2,004.
Maloney v. Campbell - (1897) 28 SCR 228 - 1897-12-09
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Priorités et hypothèques
The appellant refers to Walker v. Dickson[20]; Canada Landed and National Investment Co. v. Shaver[21]; Williams v. Balfour[22], per Strong J. at pp. 479-481, refering to Campbell v. Robinson[23].
-
2,005.
Powell v. Watters - (1897) 28 SCR 133 - 1897-12-09
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Contrat
WILLIAM F. POWELL (DEFENDANT) Appellant; And THOMAS J WATTERS (PLAINTIFF)
-
2,006.
Small v. Thompson - (1897) 28 SCR 219 - 1897-12-09
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Priorités et hypothèques
See also Williams v. Balfour[15]. Aylesworth Q.C. for the respondent.—The uncontradicted testimony shows that respondent’s purchase of the property was upon the express condition and stipulation that she was not to assume or become liable for the mortgage thereon, but that Sinclair alone was to be liable for the mortgage
-
2,007.
In Re Ferguson - (1897) 28 SCR 38 - 1897-11-10
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Successions
William Purdy, Carrie W. Eggleston, Jane H. Eggleston, Frank Purdy Eggleston, Emily Barnes, William Charles Ball, Emerson Coatsworth, and Emerson Coatsworth, Junior, Trustees of the Last Will and Testament of Edward Ferguson, Deceased (Defendants) Respondents. [...] Margaret Jane Carson, Mary Ann Bennett, Edward Galley, Emily Barnes, and William John Ball (Defendants) Respondents; [...] Wharton v. Barker[20]; In re Rees, Williams v. Davies[21]; Doe d. King v. Frost[22]; In re Taylor, Taylor v. Ley[23]; Pinder v. Pinder[24]; Clark v. Hayne[25].
-
2,008.
Knock v. Knock - (1897) 27 SCR 664 - 1897-11-10
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit des biens
Lowe v. Carpenter[1]; Wright v. Williams[2]; Earl de la War v. Miles[3]; Hollins v. Verney[4].
-
2,009.
O'Donohoe v. Bourne - (1897) 27 SCR 654 - 1897-10-29
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Appel
See Maritime Bunk v. Stewart[7]; In re Cahan[8]; McGugan v. McGugan[9]; Williams v. Leonard[10].
-
2,010.
Ernst v. Zwicker - (1897) 27 SCR 594 - 1897-06-15
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Législation
Leach v. Jay[15]; Morrall v. Sutton[16]; Lloyd v. Jackson[17]. 2 Jarman, "Wills," (5 ed.) 1205 to 1217 and 930. 2 Williams, "Executors," (9 Eng. ed.) [...] The then Chief Justice of that court, the late Sir William Young, in his elaborate judgment in that case shews that the terms "fee simple absolute" and "valid remainder" as used in ch. 112 and the sentence in which they are found were taken from a statute of the State of New York without their context in that statute, which [...] Now whatever the draftsman of this obscure statute, ch. 112, contemplated by framing into a statute what Chief Justice Sir William Young has shown to be an imperfect extract from a statute of the State of New York, it is plain, I think, that the legislature of Nova Scotia did not by it abolish estates tail having a
-
2,011.
Robertson v. Davis - (1897) 27 SCR 571 - 1897-06-07
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Action
WILLIAM H. DAVIS (DEFENDANT) Respondent. 1897: May 14; 1897: June 7 [...] The cases cited and remarks of Sir William Ritchie C.J. in Starrs v. Cosgraee ([3]), show the distinctions between that case and the present one.
-
2,012.
Taylor v. Cummings - (1897) 27 SCR 589 - 1897-06-07
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Contrat
The claim of the plaintiff for an account against William Cummings & Son and the People's Bank, with a view of making them pay over to the creditors the moneys received by them under the deed on account of the assignor's indebtedness to them, is absolutely untenable under English law, in an action to declare a deed void
-
2,013.
Banque d'Hochelaga v. Waterhouse Engine Works Co. - (1897) 27 SCR 406 - 1897-05-01
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Vente
On the 20th of November ¡ 1884 Mrs. Kelly, by a notarial deed of that date, sold and ceded this property to Francis Kelly and William Copping.
-
2,014.
Lambe v. Armstrong - (1897) 27 SCR 309 - 1897-05-01
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Procédure civile
WILLIAM B. LAMBE, ès qualité (PETITIONER FOR FOLLE ENCHERE) Appellant;
-
2,015.
May v. Logie - (1897) 27 SCR 443 - 1897-05-01
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Successions
Q. And that those persons you have named were the only survivors of William Pidgen? [...] When William Pidgen died in 1878 the law of Ontario on the subject of the descent of real property was regulated by the Act of 1852, and under that Act, William Pidgen having died without issue, his heir at law was his father, if living. [...] Solicitors for the respondent: William Mortimer Clark & Gray. [1] 23 Ont. App. R. 785.
-
2,016.
Temple v. Attorney General of Nova Scotia - (1897) 27 SCR 355 - 1897-05-01
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Mines et minéraux
William A. Temple and Others (Defendants) Appellants And The Attorney General of Nova Scotia and Robert D. Evans (Plaintiffs)
-
2,017.
Marquette Election Case (Re) - (1897) 27 SCR 219 - 1897-03-24
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Appel
William G. King (Petitioner) Appellants And William J. Roche (Respondent)
-
2,018.
West Prince Election Case - (1897) 27 SCR 241 - 1897-03-24
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Élections
William Sharp Larkin (Petitioner) Respondent. 1897: February 18, 19; 1897: March 24. [...] That the said respondent had a knowledge thereof and consented and was accessory thereto, and paid or promised to pay or repay the said William Callaghan therefor. [...] Solicitor for the appellant: William S. Stewart. Solicitor for the respondent: Arthur Peters.
-
2,019.
Winnipeg Election Case / Macdonald Election Case - (1897) 27 SCR 201 - 1897-03-24
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Élections
Edwy William Snider (Petitioner) Respondent. 1897: Feb 17; 1897: Mar 24.
-
2,020.
Adams v. McBeath - (1897) 27 SCR 13 - 1897-01-25
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Successions
George Kirsop when he heard of Adams' illness went up to his house with one William McDonald on Tuesday the 10th November. [...] I would like to know how your brother William is getting on and what he is doing for a living. [...] I would like to know how your brother William is getting on and also to have his address.
-
2,021.
Martin v. Sampson - (1897) 26 SCR 707 - 1897-01-25
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Appel
William Sampson and H.R. Angus (Defendants) Respondents. 1897: January 15, 25.
-
2,022.
Farwell v. Jameson - (1896) 26 SCR 588 - 1896-12-09
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Louage
It appears that the London and Canadian Loan Co. were in possession of the premises as mortgagees, or as assignees; that they had sanctioned the putting up in the premises a notice that the premises were to let and to apply to William Parsons, agent.
-
2,023.
McLaughlin v. McLellan - (1896) 26 SCR 646 - 1896-12-09
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Successions
Budge McLaughlin, Pineo McLaughlin, and William A. Austin (executor of a deceased son of the testator) contested the admission of the will to probate upon three grounds, viz.:—
-
2,024.
Niagara District Fruit Growers Stock Co. v. Walker - (1896) 26 SCR 629 - 1896-12-09
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Cautionnement et garantie
But I do think that the contract of suretyship is, as expressed by Lord Westbury in Williams v. Bayley12, one which “should be based upon the free and voluntary agency of the individual who enters into it.”
-
2,025.
Turcotte v. Dansereau - (1896) 26 SCR 578 - 1896-11-05
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Appel
[19] Williams v. Twine 22 Can. S. C. R. 108.