Recherche avancée

Syntaxe: "", OU, ET, EXACT(), /p, /s, /n
(AAAA ou AAAA-MM ou AAAA-MM-JJ)
Trier par : Pertinence Date

1,097 résultat(s)

  • 1,076.

    Grand Trunk Railway v. Fitzgerald - (1881) 5 SCR 204 - 1881-06-11

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Contrat

    Mason v. Scott[3], Jervis v. Berridge[4], Harris v. G.W.R.[5], re Delaware[6].

  • 1,077.

    London Life Insurance Co. v. Wright - (1881) 5 SCR 466 - 1881-02-12

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Assurance

    Mr. Scott for respondent: If it was necessary that an amendment should be made in the pleadings by adding the equitable replication, the courts in term had ample power to make such amendment[8], and the Court of Appeal has similar powers[9].

  • 1,078.

    Ryan v. Ryan - (1881) 5 SCR 387 - 1881-02-12

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Action

    The following cases all bear on this branch of the argument:—Perry v. Henderson[2]; Quincey v. Caniff[3]; Silverthorn v. Teal[4]; Heyland v. Scott[5]; Ellis v. Crawford[6]; Moore v. Doherty[7]; Allen v. England[8], quoted in Keffer v. Keffer[9].

  • 1,079.

    The Queen v. Belleau - (1881) 7 SCR 53 - 1881-02-10

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Contrat

    should extend to the road leading from that sixthly mentioned in the 9th sec. of the said ordinance, to Scott's bridge, including the said bridge, and to the main road running along the north bank of the river St. Charles, from Scott's bridge aforesaid, to the bridge over the said river, commonly called the red bridge, or

  • 1,080.

    Wheler v. Gibbs - (1880) 4 SCR 430 - 1880-06-10

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Élections

    I do not think I met him again until the meeting at Scott, in the Town Hall.   [...]  He came to my house on the Sunday following the Scott meeting. I think it was on the next morning after the Scott meeting.

  • 1,081.

    McConaghy v. Denmark - (1880) 4 SCR 609 - 1880-04-13

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Droit des biens

    Mr. Henry J. Scott for respondent: Mr. Justice Armour, who tried the case, found all the issues for the plaintiff.

  • 1,082.

    O'Brien v. The Queen - (1880) 4 SCR 529 - 1880-03-13

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Contrat

    Cy. of Bruce[5]; Elliott v. Roy. Ex. Ins. Co.[6]; Stodhart v. Lee[7]; Sharp v. San Paolo Ry.[8]; Scott v. Liverpool[9]; Clarke v. Watson[10]; Ranger v. Great Western Ry. Co.[11]; Roberts v. Bury[12].

  • 1,083.

    Chevrier v. The Queen - (1880) 4 SCR 1 - 1880-03-01

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Procédure civile

    that a judgment had been rendered in this case, no evidence has been brought by the other side, for the sham register, being a book, made up out of the office of the Prothonotary, by a person having no authority to keep a register, can have no more probative effect than if they had fyled a copy of Scott's Waverly Novels.

  • 1,084.

    Wheeler v. Gibbs - (1879) 3 SCR 374 - 1879-12-20

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Appel

    This notice is the first and only intimation the respondent has of the appeal—the previous steps by the appellant are ex parte; until this notice is given, as respects the respondent, as was said by Erle, C. J., in Scott v. Durant[2], "there has been no completed appeal," and it is only when so completed that "the appeal   [...]  Scott v. Burnham[9], cited by the appellant, does not seem to me to have any application to this case; nor does Chowdry v. Mullick[10].

  • 1,085.

    Moore v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Co. of Hartford - (1879) 6 SCR 634 - 1879-12-13

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Assurance

    [11] 7 Scott N.R. 280. [12] 11 M. & W. 817. [13] The case will be found reported in 6 App. Cases 644.

  • 1,086.

    Clark v. Scottish Imperial Insurance Co. - (1879) 4 SCR 192 - 1879-12-12

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Assurance

    In Malcolm v. Scott[24], the Vice Chancellor says: The of case Burn v. Carvallio was relied on as an authority in the plaintiff's favor.

  • 1,087.

    Lawless v. Sullivan - (1879) 3 SCR 117 - 1879-04-15

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Droit fiscal

    [17] Per Tindal, C. J., in Everett v. Wells, 2 Scott N. C. 531.

  • 1,088.

    Rickaby v. Bell - (1878) 2 SCR 560 - 1878-06-04

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]

    [7] 7 Scott N. C. 730. [8] 4 L. T. N. S. 9.

  • 1,089.

    Gore District Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. Samo - (1878) 2 SCR 411 - 1878-06-03

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Assurance

    Rose v. Scott[32]; chattel mortgage, held good in part and bad in part.

  • 1,090.

    Gray v. Richford - (1878) 2 SCR 431 - 1878-06-03

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Successions

    The evidence for the defence of Jas. Scott shows that Adam built his house and barn on the lot in ‘47 or ‘48; that the crops were taken to the west half until he had his own barn built; that he had often heard Jas. Gray say the E. ½ was “our Adam’s;” that Adam did statute labor of lot.   [...]  Now, as to Adam’s possesion, William Gray says Adam was in possession from ‘45 to ‘60; this was before he had built on the lot, for Mr. Scott says, Adam built his house and barn in ‘47 or ‘48.   [...]  James Scott proves that Adam built his house and barn on the east half in 1847 or 1848—he was then married.

  • 1,091.

    Hastings Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Shannon - (1878) 2 SCR 394 - 1878-06-03

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Assurance

    from, or in any manner vary or qualify, the written contract, Goss v. Lord Nugent[3]; Woolam v. Hearn[4]; Forsyth v. Boyle[5]; Mason v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.[6]; Mason v. Scott[7]; Jones v. Victoria Graving Dock Company[8]; Direct U. S. Cable Company v. Anglo American Telegraph Co.[9]; Shannon v. The Gore Ins. Co.[10]

  • 1,092.

    Scott v. The Queen - (1878) 2 SCR 349 - 1878-04-25

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Preuve

    Scott v. The Queen, (1878) 2 SCR 349 Supreme Court of Canada James Scott v. The Queen, (1878) 2 SCR 349   [...]  JAMES SCOTT Appellant; AND THE QUEEN Respondent. 1878: Jan 26: April 25   [...]  “James Scott. On Conviction of Stealing a Valuable Security. “Case reserved for the Court of Queen’s Bench sitting “in Appeal and Error.

  • 1,093.

    Bickford v. Grand Junction Railway Co. - (1878) 1 SCR 696 - 1878-01-28

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Transport

    Scott v. Colburn[16]; Anglo-Australian Ass. Co. v. British Prov. Ass. Co.[17]; In re Electric Telegraph Co. of Ireland; Troup’s case[18].   [...]  Ashbury Carriage Co. v. Riche[79]; Re Patent File Company[80]; Scott v. Colbourn[81]; McCormack v. Perry[82]; Pennock v. Coe[83]; Dunham v. Railway[84]; Galveston Railway Co. v. Cowdry[85]; Australian Steamship Co. v. Mounsay[86].

  • 1,094.

    Chesley v. Murdoch - (1877) 2 SCR 48 - 1877-06-28

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Législation

    [15] Per Tindal, C.J., in Everett v. Mills, 4 Scott, N. C. 531. [16] Potter's Dwarris Statutes 201.   [...]  [17] Potter's Dwarris, p. 214, citing The King v. Hale, Cro. Car. 330; 3 Lev. 82; The King v. The Mayor of Liverpool, 1 A. & E. 176; and Hine v. Reynolds, 2 Scott, N. C., 419.

  • 1,095.

    Nicholls v. Cumming - (1877) 1 SCR 395 - 1877-06-28

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Droit fiscal

    Mr. James Bethune, Q.C, and Mr. W.H. Scott, Q.C, for Respondent: The proceeding in this case is one against a public officer who is not an agent of the municipality, but an independent officer, acting under the authority of sections 93 and 106 of c. 36, 32 Vict.   [...]  Attorneys for Respondent: Scott & Edwards. [1] See case as reported in 25 U.C.C.P., 169, and in 26 U.C.C.P., 323.

  • 1,096.

    Trust and Loan Co. v. Ruttan - (1877) 1 SCR 564 - 1877-06-28

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Contrat

    Muirhead v. McDougall, et al[20]; Mackechnie v. Mackechnie[21]; Exton v. Scott[22]; Muir v. Dunnett[23]; Childers v. Childers[24]; McFarlane v. Andes Insurance Company[25]; Doe Spafford v. Brown et al[26]; Thompson v. Leach[27]; Thompson v. Leach[28]; Butler & Baker’s case[29]; Doe Garnons v. Knight[30]; Xenos v.

  • 1,097.

    Kelly v. Sulivan - (1877) 1 SCR 3 - 1877-01-15

    Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]
    Tribunaux

    Reference made also to: In re Montgomery and Moore ([20]); Duquet v. Greene ([21]); Corporation of the United Counties of Northumberland and Durham v. Town of Cobourg ([22]); Hibbert v. Scott ([23]) ; Thorpe v. Cole ([24]).