Recherche avancée
- toutes les collections (1,253)
- Décisions (529)
- Ressources (724)
529 résultat(s)
-
376.
Belanger v. Montreal Water and Power Co. - (1914) 50 SCR 356 - 1914-10-13
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit municipal
The principle of this arrêt was applied in Allen & Curry Manufacturing Co. v. Shreveport Waterworks Co.[16], to a contract not
-
377.
Long v. Toronto Rway. Co. - (1914) 50 SCR 224 - 1914-06-19
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Responsabilité civile
If he had been he would certainly, in view of the speed at which the car was moving at the time, have got safely across, Charles Allen, who saw the accident, says:— [...] The evidence of Charles Allen, apparently an independent witness and the only person other than the motorman who seems to have seen the deceased come upon the track, is as follows:— [...] Assuming the latter to be the correct view, upon the evidence of Charles Allen it is clear that the deceased, after stepping upon the track and an instant or two
-
378.
Pearson v. Adams - (1914) 50 SCR 204 - 1914-06-19
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Vente
[5] 7 Allen (Mass.) 125. [6] 3 C.P.D. 52. [7] [1900] 2 Ch. 388. [8] 7 Ch. App. 699.
-
379.
Bergklint v. Western Canada Power Co. - (1914) 50 SCR 39 - 1914-06-01
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Responsabilité civile
But this passage was construed in Allen v. The New Gas Company[15] (by the Court of Exchequer, Bramwell, Amphlett and Huddleston, BB., at p. 256), as laying down the rule that the owner must provide all that is necessary
-
380.
Theatre Amusement Co. v. Stone - (1914) 50 SCR 32 - 1914-05-18
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit commercial
The action was brought,. against the Theatre Amusement Company, Barney Allen, Julius Allen, Jay Junior Allen and a partnership firm known as The Canadian Film Exchange, by the present respon- [...] IDINGTON J.—The respondent and the three defendants, named Allen, owned in equal shares the corporate appellant and composed the partnership firm known as The Canadian Film Exchange.
-
381.
Graves v The King - (1913) 47 SCR 568 - 1913-02-24
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit criminel
Allen v. The King[14]. Newcombe K.C. for the Attorney-General of Nova Scotia discussed the evidence in regard to the res gestœ, and referred to 1 Hawk.
-
382.
Pickles v. China Mutual Ins. Co. - (1913) 47 SCR 429 - 1913-02-18
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Assurance
[5] 8 Allen (Mass.) 27. [6] 4 Q.B.D. 462. [7] 119 Mass. 45, at p. 51.
-
383.
Eberts v. The King - (1912) 47 SCR 1 - 1912-10-07
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit criminel
It is impossible to say what effect such a direction may have had in bringing the jury to their conclusion: Rex v. Everest[19].; Allen v. The King[20].
-
384.
In re Marriage Laws - (1912) 46 SCR 132 - 1912-06-17
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit constitutionnel
the fact that he was a member of the Government when, speaking for the Government, the then Minister of Justice, Sir Allen Aylesworth, said the Dominion Parliament was not competent to pass such legislation.
-
385.
Weidman v. Shragge - (1912) 46 SCR 1 - 1912-03-21
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Contrat
The doctrine of Allen v. Flood[14] might also help in conceivable circumstances to lend an appearance of legality to that which would thwart the operation of this Act and in such cases may have to be discarded.
-
386.
McKillop & Benjafield v. Alexander - (1912) 45 SCR 551 - 1912-02-20
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit des biens
In Allen v. Seclcham[18], I pointed out that the doctrine is a dangerous one.
-
387.
The King v. Cotton - (1912) 45 SCR 469 - 1912-02-20
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit constitutionnel
[43]. See Mager v. Grima[44]; Coe v. Errol[45]; Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Pennsylvania[46]; Magoun v. Illinois Trust and Savings Bank[47]; New Orleans v. Stemple[48]; Bristol v. Washington County[49]; and for state decisions Matter of Estate of Romaine[50]; Callahan v. Woodbridge[51]; Greves v. Shaw[52]; Allen v. National
-
388.
Toronto Construction Co. v. Strati - (1911) 46 SCR 631 - 1911-12-06
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Responsabilité civile
W.N. Tilley and T.R. Allen for the respondent. [1] 19 Ont. W.R. 88.
-
389.
Clarke v. Baillie - (1911) 45 SCR 50 - 1911-10-03
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Valeurs mobilières
Conmee v. Securities Holding Co.[19], at pages 609, 613; Rothschild v. Allen[20]. [...] Douglas v. Carpenter[47]; Strickland v. Magoun[48]; Rothschild v. Allen[49].
-
390.
Allen v. The King - (1911) 44 SCR 331 - 1911-03-31
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit criminel
Allen v. The King, , (1911) 44 SCR 331 Supreme Court of Canada Allen v. The King, (1911) 44 S.C.R. 331 [...] Thomas Allen Appellant; and His Majesty The King Respondent. 1911: March 28, 31. [...] The argument advanced before us that counsel was entitled in this way to test the credibility of Allen, cannot, in my opinion, be accepted.
-
391.
British Columbia Electric Railway Co. v. Crompton - (1910) 43 SCR 1 - 1910-02-15
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Législation
ton, Grimsby and Beamsville Electric Railway Co.[2], and more recently by Riddell J. in Allen v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co[3].
-
392.
Butler v. Murphy & Co. - (1909) 41 SCR 618 - 1909-05-04
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Mandat
Bibb v. Allen[8]; Irwin v. Williar[9]; Risdon Iron and Locomotive Works v. Furness[10]; Halbronn v. International Horse Agency and Exchange[11]; Robinson v. Mollett[12], at pp. 837 and 838; Hartas v. Ribbons[13]; Chapman v .
-
393.
Union Investment Co. v. Wells - (1908) 39 SCR 625 - 1908-02-18
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Lettres de change
[25] 4 Allen (Mass.) 562. [26] 108 Mass. 497-501. [27] 96 U.S.R. 51. [...] [37] 4 Allen (Mass.) 562. [38] 51 Barb. 263. [39] 11 M. & W. 374. [...] [63] 4 Allen (Mass.) 562. [64] 4 Can. L.T. 595. [65] 14 Minn. 77.
-
394.
Manitoba Free Press Co. v. Nagy - (1907) 39 SCR 340 - 1907-11-05
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Responsabilité civile
See also Chapman v. Pickersgill[22], per Pratt C.J. in answer to the same objection; Langridge v. Levy[23], at page 522, and on appeal[24]; Pasley v. Freeman[25], at page 63, also in 2 Smith's Leading Cases[26], at page 79, per Ashurst J.; Allen v. Flood[27], at page 73; Winsmore v. Greenbank[28], per Willes C.J. at page [...] Case[37] quoted by Cave J. in Allen v. Flood[38], at page 30; Paull v. Halferty[39]; Bruce v. J. M. Smith, Limited[40] Barrett v. Associated Newspapers[41]; Bowen v. Hall[42], per Brett L.J. at pages 337 and 338.
-
395.
Andrews v. Calori - (1907) 38 SCR 588 - 1907-05-07
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Vente
Allen v. Bennett[77]; Western v. Russel[78] ; Warner v. Willington[79] ; Baumann v. James[80] ; Studds v. Watson[81] ; Oliver v. Hunting[82].
-
396.
Lafferty v. Lincoln - (1907) 38 SCR 620 - 1907-05-07
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit constitutionnel
J. A. Allen, for the respondent. The Chief Justice.—The appeal is allowed with costs.
-
397.
Bank of Montreal v. The King - (1907) 38 SCR 258 - 1907-02-19
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]État
In 1871, Mr. Justice Allen, speaking for the Court of Appeals of New York, in the National Park Bank v. Ninth National Bank[22], reviewed the whole jurisprudence:
-
398.
The Union Bank of Halifax v. Spinney - (1906) 38 SCR 187 - 1906-12-26
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Institutions financières
About the 26th September, 1903, Churchill was told by Allen, the agent of the plaintiff bank, that he would have to reduce his account, and the last of September or first of October he applied to Allen for a further advance on corn and was informed by Allen that he was instructed not to advance him any more money. [...] Allen, relying on this promise paid the draft. At this time Churchill owed the bank a large sum and there was a large shortage in the corn which, however, was not known to the bank. [...] On the same day that he induced Allen to pay the draft for $5,487.47, Churchill immediately went to Stoneman, one of his indorsers and told him how he
-
399.
Leahy v. Town of North Sydney - (1906) 37 SCR 464 - 1906-05-14
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit des biens
117, 123, 132, 133; North London Railway Co. v. Metropolitan Board of Works[28]; Galloway v. Mayor of London[29]; Kennet and Avon Navigation Co. v. Witherington[30], per Martin, B.; Jones v. Stanstead, Shefford and Chambly Railroad Co.[31]; Mayer on Compensation (1903), pp. 56, 67; Brown & Allen on Compensation, 384.
-
400.
British & Foreign Bible Society v. Tupper - (1905) 37 SCR 100 - 1905-12-22
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Successions
In Allen v. McPherson[12] all the distinguished jurists who there delivered judgments, but especially Lord Lyndhurst, at page 209, and Lord Campbell, at page 233, expressed themselves in terms which leave no doubt that the ecclesiastical courts formerly could and the Court of Probate can now admit part of an instrument to