News Releases

Decision Information

Decision Content

SUPREME COURT OF CANADA ‐‐ JUDGMENTS TO BE RENDERED IN LEAVE APPLICATIONS

OTTAWA, 29/5/01.  THE  SUPREME  COURT  OF  CANADA  ANNOUNCED  TODAY  THAT  JUDGMENT  IN  THE  FOLLOWING  APPLICATIONS  FOR  LEAVE  TO  APPEAL  WILL  BE  DELIVERED  AT  9:45  A.M.  ON  THURSDAY,  MAY  31,  2001.  THIS  LIST  IS  SUBJECT  TO  CHANGE.

FROM:  SUPREME  COURT  OF  CANADA  (613) 995‐4330

 

COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA ‐‐ PROCHAINS JUGEMENTS SUR DEMANDES D’AUTORISATION

OTTAWA, 29/5/01.  LA  COUR  SUPRÊME  DU  CANADA  ANNONCE  QUE  JUGEMENT  SERA  RENDU  DANS  LES  DEMANDES  D'AUTORISATION  D'APPEL  SUIVANTES  LE  JEUDI  31  MAI  2001,  À  9 H 45.  CETTE  LISTE  EST  SUJETTE  À  MODIFICATIONS.

SOURCE:  COUR  SUPRÊME  DU  CANADA  (613) 995‐4330

 

 

1.             William Harris v. International Longshore and Warehouse Union, Ship and Dock Foreman, Local 514 Empire International Stevedores Ltd.. (FC)(Civil)(By Leave) (28343)

 

2.             Attorney General of Canada ‐ v. ‐ Camp Church & Associates, Bruce Lemer ‐ and between ‐ Attorney General of Canada ‐ v. ‐ Blake Cassels & Graydon (B.C.) (Civil) (28377)

 

3.             Petre Carabat by his Litigation Guardian Virginia Carabat, et al v. City of North York (Ont.)(28260)

 

4.             Her Majesty the Queen v. Peter Donald Unfried - and between- Peter Donald Unfried v. Her Majesty the Queen (Criminal)(Man.)(28358)

 

5.             Her Majesty the Queen v. James Joseph Lauzon (Criminal)(Man.)(28423)

 

6.             Cecil Mills v. Tena Hardy (N.S.)(28374)

 

7.             The Council of the Cheslatta Carrier v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia, et al. (B.C.)(28309)

 

8.             Angelina Codina v. Her Majesty the Queen (Criminal)(Ont.)(28434)

 

9.             J.R.L. v. Her Majesty the Queen (Criminal)(Ont.)(28381)

 

10.           Gabor L. Zsoldos v. Banfill Holvaci (Ont.)(28262)

 

11.           Gabor L. Zsoldos v. The Ontario Association of Architects (Ont.)(28263)

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.