SUPREME COURT OF CANADA ‐‐ JUDGMENTS TO BE RENDERED IN LEAVE APPLICATIONS
OTTAWA, 20/2/01. THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA ANNOUNCED TODAY THAT JUDGMENT IN THE FOLLOWING APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL WILL BE DELIVERED AT 9:45 A.M. ON THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2001. THIS LIST IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
FROM: SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (613) 995‐4330
COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA ‐‐ PROCHAINS JUGEMENTS SUR DEMANDES D’AUTORISATION
OTTAWA, 20/2/01. LA COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA ANNONCE QUE JUGEMENT SERA RENDU DANS LES DEMANDES D'AUTORISATION D'APPEL SUIVANTES LE JEUDI 22 FÉVRIER 2001, À 9 H 45. CETTE LISTE EST SUJETTE À MODIFICATIONS.
SOURCE: COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA (613) 995‐4330
1. Glen Ekman ‐ v. ‐ Her Majesty the Queen (B.C.) (Criminal) (By Leave) (28056)
2. Resman Holdings Ltd. (The Successor Amalgamated Corporation to Airtex Industries Ltd.), Dex Resources Ltd. and Resman Holdings Ltd. (The Successor Amalgamated Corporation to Resman Oil & Gas Ltd.) ‐ v. ‐ Her Majesty the Queen (FC) (Civil) (By Leave) (28080)
3. The Gazette, une division de Southam Inc. c. Conseil du référendum, et al (Qué.)(27961)
4. David Jonathan Wild v. Her Majesty the Queen (Crim.)(B.C.)(26384)
5. Vadim Gindis v. Ritchie Scott Brisbourne (B.C.)(27827)
6. Apotex Inc. v. Attorney General of Canada and the Minister of Health, et al (FC)(28059)
7. Jacques Chaoulli c. Ministre de la Santé et des Services sociaux, et al (Qué.)(27910)
8. Jacques Chaoulli c. Régie de l’assurance-maladie du Québec (Qué.)(28252)
9. Jacques Chaoulli v. Procureure générale du Québec (Qué.)(28253)
10. Ontario Teachers’ Federation (“OTF”), et al v. Attorney General of Ontario (Ont.) (28113)
AND IN THE FOLLOWING APPLICATIONS FOR RE‐HEARING / ET DANS LES DEMANDES DE NOUVELLE AUDITION SUIVANTES:
1. Camco Inc. and General Electric Company ‐ v. ‐ Whirlpool Corporation, Inglis and Limited (FC) (Civil) (27208)
2. Maytag Corporation, Maytag Limited and Maytag Quebec Inc. ‐ v. ‐ Whirlpool Corporation and Inglis Limited (FC) (Civil) (27209)