News Releases

Decision Information

Decision Content

SUPREME COURT OF CANADA ‑‑ JUDGMENTS TO BE RENDERED IN LEAVE APPLICATIONS

OTTAWA, 16/9/03.  THE  SUPREME  COURT  OF  CANADA  ANNOUNCED  TODAY  THAT  JUDGMENT  IN  THE  FOLLOWING  APPLICATIONS  FOR  LEAVE  TO  APPEAL  WILL  BE  DELIVERED  AT  9:45  A.M.  ON  THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER  18,  2003.  THIS  LIST  IS  SUBJECT  TO  CHANGE.

FROM:  SUPREME  COURT  OF  CANADA  (613) 995‑4330

 

COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA ‑‑ PROCHAINS JUGEMENTS SUR DEMANDES D’AUTORISATION

OTTAWA, 16/9/03.  LA  COUR  SUPRÊME  DU  CANADA  ANNONCE  QUE  JUGEMENT  SERA  RENDU  DANS  LES  DEMANDES  D'AUTORISATION  D'APPEL  SUIVANTES  LE  JEUDI  18  SEPTEMBRE  2003,  À  9 H 45.  CETTE  LISTE  EST  SUJETTE  À  MODIFICATIONS.

SOURCE:  COUR  SUPRÊME  DU  CANADA  (613) 995‑4330

COMMENTS/COMMENTAIRES: comments@scc-csc.gc.ca

 

1.             Ivan William Mervin Henry v. Vancouver City Police, et al. (B.C.) (Crim.) (29689)

 

2.             George Howie v. Her Majesty the Queen (B.C.) (Crim.) (29698)

 

3.             Her Majesty the Queen v. Darren Jalmer Shuparski (Sask.) (Crim.) (29704)

 

4.             Rose Bear v. Her Majesty the Queen (FC) (29666)

 

5.             Rory Eldon Foreman v. Her Majesty the Queen (Ont.) (Crim.) (29742)

 

6.             Michele Coscia v. Her Majesty the Queen (Ont.) (Crim.) (29705)

 

7.             Danielle Diane Vaillancourt v. Peter Molnar, Administrator of the Estate of Colin Sandor Molnar, Deceased (B.C.) (29619)

 

8.             Emile Mennes v. Lucie McClung, et al (FC) (29669)

 

9.             Chippewas of Nawash First Nation, et al. v. Her Majesty the Queen, as represented by the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans, et al. (FC) (29568)

 

10.           Richard Condo v. The Attorney General of Canada (FC) (29723)

 

11.           Geskeem Weabury v. Her Majesty the Queen (N.B.) (Crim.) (29758)

 

12.           Mark Arthur Antonius v. Her Majesty the Queen (B.C.) (Crim.) (29760)

 

13.           C.U. v. Marley McGonigle, et al. (Alta.) (29432)

 

14.           Kenneth William Koska, et al. v. Alberta Treasury Branches (Alta.) (29674)

 

15.           Donald Pearson, et al. v. Boliden Limited, et al. (B.C.) (29578)

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.