SUPREME COURT OF CANADA ‐‐ JUDGMENTS IN APPEALS AND LEAVE APPLICATIONS
OTTAWA, 20/3/03. THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA HAS TODAY DEPOSITED WITH THE REGISTRAR JUDGMENTS IN THE FOLLOWING APPEALS AND APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL.
FROM: SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (613) 995‐4330
COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA ‐‐ JUGEMENTS SUR POURVOIS ET DEMANDES D’AUTORISATION
OTTAWA, 20/3/03. LA COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA A DÉPOSÉ AUJOURD'HUI AUPRÈS DU REGISTRAIRE LES JUGEMENTS DANS LES APPELS ET LES DEMANDES D’AUTORISATION D’APPEL SUIVANTS.
SOURCE: COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA (613) 995‐4330
COMMENTS/COMMENTAIRES: comments@scc-csc.gc.ca
APPEALS / APPELS:
(Reasons for judgment will be available shortly at: / Motifs de jugement disponibles sous peu à:
http://www.scc‐csc.gc.ca )
28834 The Crown in Right of Alberta and Jim Dixon, Public Service Commissioner of Alberta - v. - Audrey Allen, William Bentley, Faye Chorney, B.C. Desai, Po Y. Fok, Cynthia Formaniuk, Larry Fraser, Cecile Gartner, George Gordon, Joseph Huba, Allan Jones, James Kocyba, Sai‐Bong Lee, Patrick Malcolmson, Donald Maltais, Harold Matheson, Robert Osokin, Christine Ostanoski, George Parsons, Beverly Peterson, Satwant Rakhra, Alfred Richards, Robert Roseberg, Fernando Raul Scherpenisse, Duane Sears, Volesh Shaikh, Normin Simpson, Robin Sundstrom, Christine Vaillancourt, Donna Vanderbrink, Daniel Warkentin, Edward Waud and Nyuk‐Ken Wong (Ont.) 2003 SCC 13 / 2003 CSC 13
Coram: McLachlin C.J. and Iacobucci, Major, Bastarache, Binnie, Arbour and LeBel JJ.
The appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal of Alberta (Edmonton), Number 9903‐0401‐AC, dated June 29, 2001, was heard on December 10, 2002 and the Court on that day delivered the following judgment orally:
The appeal is allowed with reasons to follow.
On this day reasons were delivered and the judgment was restated as follows:
The appeal is allowed, the judgment of the Alberta Court of Appeal is reversed, and the judgment of the Court of Queen’s Bench staying the action is reinstated, with costs throughout.
L'appel contre l'arrêt de la Cour d'appel de l'Alberta (Edmonton), numéro 9903‐0401‐AC, en date du 29 juin 2001, a été entendu le 10 décembre 2002 et la Cour a prononcée oralement le même jour le jugement suivant :
L’appel est accueilli avec motifs à suivre.
Aujourd’hui la Cour a déposé des motifs et reformulé le jugement comme suit :
L’appel est accueilli, l’arrêt de la Cour d’appel de l’Alberta est infirmé et le jugement de la Cour du Banc de la Reine qui a suspendu l’action est rétabli, avec dépens devant toutes les cours.
28469 The Corporation of the City of Ottawa - v. - Ken Goudie, Ron Labonté, Lloyd Laframboise, Conrad Lirette and Rémi Séguin (Ont.) 2003 SCC 14 / 2003 CSC 14
Coram: McLachlin C.J. and Iacobucci, Major, Bastarache, Binnie, Arbour and LeBel JJ.
The appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Number C34365, dated January 18, 2001, heard on December 10, 2002 is dismissed with costs to the respondents.
L’appel contre l’arrêt de la Cour d’appel de l’Ontario, numéro C34365, en date du 18 janvier 2001, entendu le 10 décembre 2002 est rejeté avec dépens aux intimés.
APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE / LES DEMANDES D’AUTORISATION:
Note for subscribers:
For those subscribers requiring more information, the judgments on leaves will be available within 24 hours at http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca. Click on Information on Cases, then click on SCC Case Information.
Remarque à l’intention des abonnés :
Pour de plus amples informations, les jugements dans les demandes d’autorisation seront affichés dans un délai de 24 heures à l’adresse suivante : http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca . Vous pourrez les consulter en cliquant sur « Renseignements sur les dossiers de la Cour », puis sur « Renseignements sur les dossiers ».
GRANTED WITH COSTS / ACCORDÉES AVEC DÉPENS
Director, Income Maintenance Branch, Ministry of Community and Social Services, et al. v. Sandra Falkiner, Deborah Sears, Cynthia Johnston-Pepping and Claude Marie Cadieux (Ont.)(Civil) (29294)
(granted on condition that the applicants undertake to pay party and party costs in any event of the cause / accordée sous condition que les demandeurs entreprennent de payer les dépens comme entre parties quelle que soit l’issue de l’appel)
The Minister of Forests, et al. v. Council of the Haida Nation and Guujaaw, on their own behalf and on behalf of all members of the Haida Nation (B.C.)(Civil) (29419)
(By agreement, the applicants, the Minister of Forests and the Attorney General of British Columbia, shall pay the party and party costs of the Respondents, Council of the Haida Nation and Guujaaw, for this application for leave to appeal and for the appeal, in any event of the cause. / De consentement, les demandeurs, Le ministre des Forêts et le Procureur général de la Colombie-Britannique, paieront les dépens des intimés, Council of the Haida Nation et Guujaaw, sur la base des frais entre parties, pour cette demande d’autorisation d’appel et pour l’appel, quelle que soit l’issue de l’appel.)
Weyerhaeuser Company Limited - v. - Council of the Haida Nation and Guujaaw, on their own behalf and on behalf of all members of the Haida Nation (B.C.)(Civil) (29419)
(granted with costs in the cause / accordée avec dépens selon l’issue de la cause)
Robert Kenneth Hartshorne v. Kathleen Mary Mildred Hartshorne (B.C.)(Civil) (29531)
The City of Calgary v. The United Taxi Drivers’ Fellowship of Southern Alberta, et al. (Alta.)(Civil) (29321)
GRANTED WITHOUT COSTS / ACCORDÉE SANS DÉPENS
The Minister of Human Resources Development Canada v. Betty Hodge (FC)(Civil) (29351)
DISMISSED / REJETÉES
Michael Bogart v. Her Majesty the Queen (Ont.) (Criminal) (By Leave) (29310)
Susan Lynn Czaban v. Brandy Rai MacPherson (29481) (B.C.)
DISMISSED WITH COSTS / REJETÉES AVEC DÉPENS
Sarg Oils Ltd. v. The Energy Resources Conservation Board, et al. (Alta.) (Civil) (By Leave) (29314)
John Howard Teskey v. Mike Grzelak (Ont.) (Civil) (By Leave) (29402)
Enid Robitaille, et al. v. Anspor Construction Limited, et al. (Ont.) (Civil) (By Leave) (29363)
Archean Resources Ltd. v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Newfoundland and Labrador, et al. (T.L.) (Civil) (By Leave) (29390)
Myra M.D. Simanek v. Garry Lamourie (Ont.) (Civil) (By Leave) (29384)
Smithkline Beecham Pharma Inc., et al. v. Apotex Inc. et al. (FC) (Civil) (By Leave) (29328)
Russell Deigan v. Attorney General of Canada (Industry Canada) (FC) (Civil) (By Leave) (29404)
Municipality of the County of Antigonish v. Town of Antigonish (N.S.) (Civil) (By Leave) (29378)
Syntex (U.S.A) L.L.C., et al. v. The Minister of Health, et al. (FC) (Civil) (By Leave) (29396)
Water's Edge Village Estates (Phase II) Ltd., et al. v. Her Majesty the Queen (FCA) (Civil) (29392)
Magnaflex Industries Inc. v. Victoria Park Avenue Associates Limited Partnership, et al. (Ont.) (Civil) (By Leave) (29448)
Karen L. Turner‐Lienaux, et al. v. Wesley G. Campbell (N.S.) (Civil) (By Leave) (29407)
Sinclair‐Cockburn Insurance Brokers Limited v. Linda Anne Richards, et al. (Ont.) (Civil) (By Leave) (29431)
Guangshu Li, et al. v. Nina Li, et al. (Ont.) (Civil) (By Leave) (29478)
Barbara Parravano, et al. v. KPMG Incorporated, et al. (Ont.) (Civil) (By Leave) (29464)
Daniel Edward Webb v. Waterloo Regional Police Services Board, et al. (Ont.) (Civil) (By Leave) (29397)
Board of School Trustees of Regional Administrative Unit #3 v. Richard W. Morin (P.E.I.)(Civil) (29417)
DISMISSED WITHOUT COSTS / REJETÉES SANS DÉPENS
Robert Silver, et al. v. The Business Development Corporation formely known as The Federal Business Development Bank, et al. (N.S.) (Civil) (By Leave) )29381)
Dr. Kazi K. Bakht v. Minister of Human Resources Development, Canada (FC) (Civil) (By Leave) (29340)
Krystyna Brebric, et al. v. Ivan Niksic (Ont.) (Civil) (By Leave) (29388)