News Releases

Decision Information

Decision Content

SUPREME COURT OF CANADA ‑‑ JUDGMENTS IN LEAVE APPLICATIONS

OTTAWA, 2008‑02-21.  THE  SUPREME  COURT  OF  CANADA  HAS  TODAY  RENDERED  JUDGMENT  IN  THE  FOLLOWING  APPLICATIONS  FOR  LEAVE  TO  APPEAL.

FROM: SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (613) 995‑4330

COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA ‑‑ JUGEMENTS SUR DEMANDES D’AUTORISATION

OTTAWA, 2008‑02-21.  LA  COUR  SUPRÊME  DU  CANADA  A  RENDU  JUGEMENT  AUJOURD’HUI  DANS  LES  DEMANDES  D’AUTORISATION  D’APPEL  SUIVANTES.

SOURCE: COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA (613) 995‑4330

COMMENTS/COMMENTAIRES: comments@scc‑csc.gc.ca

 

Note for subscribers:

The summaries of the cases are available at http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca :

Click on Cases and on SCC Case Information, type in the Case Number and press Search.  Click on the Case Number on the Search Result screen, and when the docket screen appears, click on Summary which will appear in the left column.

 

Alternatively, click on

http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/news_release/2008/08-02-18.2a/08-02-18.2a.html

 

Note pour les abonnés :

Les sommaires des causes sont affichés à ladresse http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca :

Cliquez sur « Dossiers », puis sur « Renseignements sur les dossiers ». Tapez le no de dossier et appuyez sur « Recherche ».  Cliquez sur le no du dossier dans les Résultats de la recherche pour accéder au Registre.  Cliquez enfin sur le lien menant au « Sommaire » qui figure dans la colonne de gauche.

 

Autre façon de procéder : Cliquez sur

http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/fr/news_release/2008/08-02-18.2a/08-02-18.2a.html

 

 

DISMISSED / REJETÉES

 

 

Ezra Elliott Lefthand v. Her Majesty the Queen (Alta.) (Criminal) (By Leave) (32250)

Coram: McLachlin / Fish / Rothstein

 

Edward Joseph Eagle Child v. Her Majesty the Queen (Alta.) (Criminal) (By Leave) (32257)

Coram: McLachlin / Fish / Rothstein

 

Chief Denton George, in his personal capacity and on behalf of the Ochapowace Indian Band, et al. v. Her Majesty the Queen as represented by the Minister of Justice of Saskatchewan, et al. (Sask.) (Criminal) (By Leave) (32322)

Coram: McLachlin / Fish / Rothstein

 

Her Majesty the Queen v. George Roswell Osmond (B.C.) (Criminal) (By Leave) (32336)

Coram: McLachlin / Fish / Rothstein

 

Christopher Lachappelle v. Her Majesty the Queen (Ont.) (Crim.) (By Leave) (32272)

(The application for an extension of time is granted and the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. / La demande de prorogation de délai est accordée et la demande d’autorisation d’appel est rejetée.)

Coram: Bastarache / Abella / Charron

 


DISMISSED WITH COSTS / REJETÉES AVEC DÉPENS

 

 

Daniel E. MacDougall, et al. v. Ontario Northland Transportation Commission, et al. (Ont.) (Civil) (By Leave) (32284)

Coram: McLachlin / Fish / Rothstein

 

De Trang, et al. v. Director of the Edmonton Remand Centre, et al. (Alta.) (Civil) (By Leave) (32310)

Coram: McLachlin / Fish / Rothstein

 

Moresby Explorers Ltd., et al. v. Attorney General of Canada, et al. (F.C.) (Civil) (By Leave) (32327)

Coram: McLachlin / Fish / Rothstein

 

Vladimir Volzhenin v. Bruk Tekabe Haile (B.C.) (Civil) (By Leave) (32227)

(The application for an extension of time is granted and the application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs. / La demande de prorogation de délai est accordée et la demande d’autorisation d’appel est rejetée avec dépens.)

Coram: McLachlin / Fish / Rothstein

 

Aviva Canada Inc. c. René Dubé et autre (Qc) (Civile) (Autorisation) (32306)

Coram: Bastarache / Abella / Charron

 

City Centre Aviation Ltd. et al. v. Jazz Air LP, et al. - and between - Toronto Port Authority v. City Centre Aviation Ltd., et al. (F.C.) (Civil) (By Leave) (32308)

(The motion for a stay of execution is dismissed and the applications for leave to appeal are dismissed with costs to the respondent Jazz Air LP. / La requête en sursis d’exécution est rejetée et les demandes d’autorisation d’appel sont rejetées avec dépens en faveur de l’intimée Jazz Air LP.)

Coram: Bastarache / Abella / Charron

 

Morneau Sobeco Limited Partnership, in its capacity as pension plan administrator of two pension plans sponsored by General Chemical Canada Ltd., a bankrupt, et al. v. Harbert Distressed Investment Fund, et al. (Ont.) (Civil) (By Leave) (32335)

(The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondents Harbert Distressed Investment Fund, L.P. and Harbert Distressed Investment Master Fund Ltd. / La demande d’autorisation d’appel est rejetée avec dépens en faveur des intimées Harbert Distressed Investment Fund. L.P. et Harbert Distressed Investment Master Fund Ltd.)

Coram: Bastarache / Abella / Charron

 

Association de protection des épargnants et investisseurs du Québec (A.P.E.I.Q.) et autres c. Corporation Nortel Networks et autre  - et - Fonds d’aide aux recours collectifs (Qc) (Civile) (Autorisation) (32348)

(La demande d’autorisation d’appel est rejetée avec dépens en faveur de l’intimé Ontario Public Service Employees’ Union Pension Plan Trust Fund. / The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondent Ontario Public Service Employees’ Union Pension Plan Trust Fund.)

Coram: Bastarache / Abella / Charron

 

Clifford W. Skarstedt et autre c. Corporation Nortel Networks et autre - et - Fonds d’aide aux recours collectifs (Qc) (Civile) (Autorisation) (32351)

(La demande d’autorisation d’appel est rejetée avec dépens en faveur des intimés Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board and Department of Treasury of the State of New Jersey and its Division of Investment. / The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondents Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board and Department of Treasury of the State of New Jersey and its Division of Investment.)

Coram: Bastarache / Abella / Charron

 


Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company v. Michael J. Sorotski - and between - CNH Global N.V., Case Canada Corporation, and its affiliates, subsidiaries and associated corporations v. Michael Sorotski (Sask.) (Civil) (By Leave) (32373)

Coram: Bastarache / Abella / Charron

 

 

 

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.