Supreme Court of Canada / Cour suprême du Canada
(le français suit)
JUDGMENT IN APPEAL
May 14, 2014
For immediate release
OTTAWA – The Supreme Court of Canada has today deposited with the Registrar judgment in the following appeal.
Reasons for judgment will be available shortly at: http://scc.lexum.org/decisia-scc-csc/scc-csc/en/nav.do
JUGEMENT SUR APPEL
Le 14 mai 2014
Pour diffusion immédiate
OTTAWA – La Cour suprême du Canada a déposé aujourd’hui auprès du registraire le jugement dans l’appel suivant.
Motifs de jugement disponibles sous peu à: http://scc.lexum.org/decisia-scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/nav.do
34884 Minister of Citizenship and Immigration and Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness v. Mohamed Harkat – and – Attorney General of Ontario, British Columbia Civil Liberties Association, Canadian Council of Criminal Defence Lawyers, Canadian Civil Liberties Association, Canadian Bar Association, Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers, Canadian Council for Refugees, International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group, Canadian Council on American-Islamic Relations (now known as National Council of Canadian Muslims), Amnesty International and Criminal Lawyers’ Association (Ontario) (F.C.)
2014 SCC 37/ 2014 CSC 37
Coram: McLachlin C.J. and LeBel, Abella, Rothstein, Cromwell, Moldaver, Karakatsanis and Wagner JJ.
The appeal from the judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal, Number A-76-11, 2012 FCA 122, dated April 25, 2012, heard on October 10 and 11, 2013, is allowed in part, Abella and Cromwell JJ. dissenting in part. The cross-appeal is dismissed. The IRPA scheme is constitutional. The designated judge’s conclusion that the security certificate was reasonable is reinstated.
L’appel interjeté contre l’arrêt de la Cour d’appel fédérale, numéro A-76-11, 2012 CAF 122, en date du 25 avril 2012, entendu les 10 et 11 octobre 2013, est accueilli en partie. Les juges Abella et Cromwell sont dissidents en partie. L’appel incident est rejeté. Le régime instauré par la LIPR est constitutionnel. La conclusion du juge désigné selon laquelle le certificat de sécurité était raisonnable est rétablie.
Supreme Court of Canada / Cour suprême du Canada :
comments-commentaires@scc-csc.ca
(613) 995-4330