News Releases

Decision Information

Decision Content

SUPREME COURT OF CANADA ‐‐ JUDGMENTS TO BE RENDERED ON LEAVE APPLICATIONS

 

OTTAWA, 17/6/97.  THE  SUPREME  COURT  OF  CANADA  ANNOUNCED  TODAY  THAT  JUDGMENT  IN  THE  FOLLOWING  APPLICATIONS  FOR  LEAVE  TO  APPEAL  WILL  BE  DELIVERED  AT  9:45  A.M.  ON  THURSDAY  JUNE  19,  1997.  THIS LIST  IS  SUBJECT TO  CHANGE.

 

FROM:  SUPREME  COURT  OF  CANADA  (613) 995‐4330

                                                                                                 

 

COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA ‐‐ PROCHAINS JUGEMENTS SUR DEMANDES D’AUTORISATION

 

OTTAWA, 17/6/97.  LA  COUR  SUPRÊME  DU  CANADA  ANNONCE  QUE  JUGEMENT  SERA  RENDU  DANS  LES  DEMANDES  D'AUTORISATION  D'APPEL SUIVANTES  LE  JEUDI  19  JUIN  1997,  À  9 H 45.   CETTE  LISTE  EST  SUJETTE  À  MODIFICATIONS.

 

SOURCE:  COUR  SUPRÊME  DU  CANADA  (613) 995‐4330

                                                                                                  

 

1.         Coopérative de commerce Des Milles-Îles, André Malo, Paul Bélanger, Pierre Laporte c. Société des alcools du Québec (S.A.Q.) et le Procureur général du Québec (Qué.)(25703)

 

2.         Domenico Manno v. United States of America and Minister of Justice Canada (Qué.)(25745)

 

3.         Sentinel Self-Storage Corporation v. Her Majesty the Queen - and between - On-Guard Self-Storage Limited v. Her Majesty the Queen (F.C.A.)(Alta.)(25792)

 

4.         Quintus Perera and Iris Aloysius v. Aristea Stavropoulos (Qué.)(25830)

 

5.         Sa Majesté la Reine c. Daniel Cook (Qué.)(25862)

 

6.         Yves Bisson c. Sa Majesté la Reine (Qué.)(25821)

 

7.         The Queen v. R.C. (Crim.)(Nfld.)(25682)

 

8.         CCLC Technologies v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(25631)

 

9.         Raymond Gauvreau v. Libero C. Paci (Ont.)(25628)

 

10.        Bradley Rallison v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.)(25713)

 

11.        B.J. Kern & Son v. Settlers Savings and Mortgage Corp. (Sask.)(25698)

 

12.        Merck & Co. v. Minister of National Health and Welfare (F.C.A.)(25660) and

 

13.        Merck & Co. v. Minister of National Health and Welfare (F.C.A.)(25661)

 


14.        James Walter Taylor v. The Queen (N.S.)(25726)

 

15.        Altoba Development Ltd. v. Saskpower (Sask.)(25759)

 

16.        Saskatoon City Hospital v. Saskatchewan Union of Nurses (Sask.)(25757)

 

17.        Eileen Grace Bahlsen v. The Queen represented by the Minister of Transport (F.C.A.)(25783)

 

18.        Double Bar L Ranching Ltd. v. Bayvet Corporation (Sask.)(25706)

 

19.        Caldwell & Ross Ltd. v. The Queen (Crim.)(N.B.)(25882)

 

20.        Thomas White v. Woolworth Canada Inc. (Nfld.)(25397)

 

21.        Francis Wayne MacDonald v. James Mombourquette (N.S.)(25587)

 

22.        Sault Ste-Marie Bd. of Police Commissioners v. Makila (Ont.)(25527)

 

23.        Friends of the Lubicon v. Daishowa Inc. (Ont.)(25608)

 

24.        Gordon Garland v. Consumers Gas Co. Ltd. (Ont.)(25644)

 

25.        Coopers & Lybrand, Trustee of Manning Mercury Sales v. Ford Motor Co. (Sask.)(25710)

 

26.        Murray Ryan v. Corporation of the City of Victoria (B.C.)(25704)

 

27.        The Queen v. Gregory Jacob Parsons (Crim.)(Nfld.)(25777)

 

28.        Barbican Properties Inc. v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(25760)

 

29.        Eric William Hutchings v. The Queen (Crim.)(B.C.)(25550)

 

30.        Richard Gerry White v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.)(25775)

 

31.        Yves Rheal Cote v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.)(25854)

 

32.        Radcliffe Mark Hall v. Her Majesty the Queen (Crim.)(Alta.)(25809)

 

33.        M.C.L. v. Her Majesty the Queen (Crim.)(Alta.)(25905)

 

34.        Leonardo G. Galuego v. Carol Hensley and Daryl Bean (Ont.)(25806)

 

35.        Gordon H. Freund Professional Corporation, et al v. Paul Haljan (Alta.)(25804)

 

36.        Joe W. Harris v. Cinabar Enterprises Ltd. and Larry B. Nugent (Alta.)(25801)

 

37.        Réal Melanson c. Université de Montréal, et al (Qué.)(25678)

 

38.        Anamor Investments Inc. c. Levy Pilotte et Associés Inc., et al (Qué.)(25743)

 


AND IN THE FOLLOWING APPLICATIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION / ET DANS LES DEMANDES SUIVANTES DE RÉEXAMEN:

 

1.         Eric Yu-Hua Chu v. Huberman Cristall Hutchinson (B.C.)(25681)

 

2.         Georges Guay c. Sa Majesté la Reine (Crim.)Qué.)(23388)

                                                                                                                                                               

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.