News Releases

Decision Information

Decision Content

SUPREME COURT OF CANADA ‐‐ JUDGMENTS TO BE RENDERED IN LEAVE APPLICATIONS

OTTAWA, 12/5/98.  THE  SUPREME  COURT  OF  CANADA  ANNOUNCED  TODAY  THAT  JUDGMENT  IN  THE  FOLLOWING  APPLICATIONS  FOR  LEAVE  TO  APPEAL  WILL  BE  DELIVERED  AT  9:45  A.M.  ON  THURSDAY  MAY  14,  1998.  THIS LIST  IS  SUBJECT TO  CHANGE.

FROM:  SUPREME  COURT  OF  CANADA  (613) 995‐4330

                                                                                                 

COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA ‐‐ PROCHAINS JUGEMENTS SUR DEMANDES D’AUTORISATION

OTTAWA, 12/5/98.  LA  COUR  SUPRÊME  DU  CANADA  ANNONCE  QUE  JUGEMENT  SERA  RENDU  DANS  LES  DEMANDES  D'AUTORISATION  D'APPEL SUIVANTES  LE  JEUDI  14  MAI  1998,  À  9 H 45.   CETTE  LISTE  EST  SUJETTE  À  MODIFICATIONS.

SOURCE:  COUR  SUPRÊME  DU  CANADA  (613) 995‐4330

                                                                                                 

 

1.             Douglas Earl Guyatt v. Her Majesty the Queen (Crim.)(B.C)(26332)

 

2.             Lai Ling Yammie Kwan v. Her Majesty the Queen (Crim.)(Man.)(26408)

 

3.             Erwin Franz Sillipp v. Her Majesty the Queen (Crim.)(Alta.)(26409)

 

4.             Sheila Robertson v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, et al (B.C.)(26448)

 

5.             Roger Wallace Warren v. Her Majesty the Queen (Crim.)(N.W.T.)(26216)

 

6.             Canadian Standards Association v. Jim Campbell, et al (B.C.)(26433)

 

7.             R.G.F. v. Her Majesty the Queen (Crim.)(Alta.)(26461)

 

8.             Beata Michalski, et al v. Graydon Olson, et al (Man.)(26432)

 

9.             Seamus Leonard, et al v. Stéphane Houle, et al (Ont.)(26440)

 

10.           Jones William Ignace, et al v. Regina (Crim.)(B.C.)(26185)

 

11.           Harold Pascal v. Carl Walker (Crim.)(B.C.)(26186)

 

12.           Verna Friday v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario, et al (Ont.)(26460)

 

13.           James T. Allard, et al v. Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, et al (B.C.)(26467)

 

14.           Malcolm Keith MacNeil v. Deborah Elizabeth MacNeil (B.C.)(26435)

 

 

AND IN THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION FOR RECONSIDERATION - ET DANS LA DEMANDE SUIVANTE DE RÉEXAMEN:

 

1.             Her Majesty the Queen by way of Mandamus with Lawrence R. Whitney v. Ontario Court of Justice (General Division) Northeast (Crim.)(Ont.)(26333)


                                                                                                                                                               

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.