News Releases

Decision Information

Decision Content

SUPREME COURT OF CANADA ‑‑ JUDGMENTS TO BE RENDERED IN LEAVE APPLICATIONS

OTTAWA, 27/5/99.  THE  SUPREME  COURT  OF  CANADA  ANNOUNCED  TODAY  THAT  JUDGMENT  IN  THE  FOLLOWING  APPLICATIONS  FOR  LEAVE  TO  APPEAL  WILL  BE  DELIVERED  AT  9:45  A.M.  ON  MONDAY,  MAY  31,  1999.  THIS LIST  IS  SUBJECT TO  CHANGE.

FROM:  SUPREME  COURT  OF  CANADA  (613) 995‑4330

                                                                             

COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA ‑‑ PROCHAINS JUGEMENTS SUR DEMANDES D’AUTORISATION

OTTAWA, 27/5/99.  LA  COUR  SUPRÊME  DU  CANADA  ANNONCE  QUE  JUGEMENT  SERA  RENDU  DANS  LES  DEMANDES  D'AUTORISATION  D'APPEL  SUIVANTES  LE  LUNDI  31  MAI  1999,  À  9 H 45.   CETTE  LISTE  EST  SUJETTE  À  MODIFICATIONS.

SOURCE:  COUR  SUPRÊME  DU  CANADA  (613) 995‑4330

 

 

1.             Casimir Chciuk v. Her Majesty the Queen (Ont.)(27076)

 

2.             John Krist v. Her Majesty the Queen (B.C.)(26970)

 

3.             Pegi Horne and Haliburton Forest & Wild Life Reserve Limited v. Bombardier, Inc. and Promotion Activators, Inc. (Ont.)(27021)

 

4.             Craig Bendt Matthiessen v. Her Majesty the Queen (Alta.)(27170)

 

5.             Bernie Mensink et al. v. Tracy Marie Dale et al. (Ont.)(27135)

 

6.             Jevco Insurance Company v. Commercial Union Assurance Company (Ont.)(27129)

 

7.             Kevin Morton et al. v. The Dominion of Canada General Insurance Company (Ont.)(27130)

 

8.             W.S.R. v. Her Majesty the Queen (Crim.)(Ont.)(27177)

 

9.             Dr. Eric Leu and Dr. Pat McLean v. Health One (Ont.)(27037)

 

10.           Ronald Clement v. The Attorney General for Ontario (Crim.)(Ont.)(27078)

 

11.           S.A.K. v. A.C. (Alta.)(27038)

 

12.           Northwood Pulp and Timber Limited v. Her Majesty the Queen (F.C.A.)(B.C.)(27033)

 

13.           Prem Malhotra v. Attorney General of Canada (Ont.)(27034)

 

14.           Jack Douglas Pringle v. London City Police Services Board and Dean Lees (Ont.)(26935)

 

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.