News Releases

Decision Information

Decision Content

SUPREME COURT OF CANADA ‑‑ JUDGMENTS TO BE RENDERED IN LEAVE APPLICATIONS

OTTAWA, 2/3/99.  THE  SUPREME  COURT  OF  CANADA  ANNOUNCED  TODAY  THAT  JUDGMENT  IN  THE  FOLLOWING  APPLICATIONS  FOR  LEAVE  TO  APPEAL  WILL  BE  DELIVERED  AT  9:45  A.M.  ON  THURSDAY,  MARCH  4,  1999.  THIS LIST  IS  SUBJECT TO  CHANGE.

FROM:  SUPREME  COURT  OF  CANADA  (613) 995‑4330

                                                                                                 

COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA ‑‑ PROCHAINS JUGEMENTS SUR DEMANDES D’AUTORISATION

OTTAWA, 2/3/99.  LA  COUR  SUPRÊME  DU  CANADA  ANNONCE  QUE  JUGEMENT  SERA  RENDU  DANS  LES  DEMANDES  D'AUTORISATION  D'APPEL  SUIVANTES  LE  JEUDI  4  MARS  1999,  À  9 H 45.   CETTE  LISTE  EST  SUJETTE  À  MODIFICATIONS.

SOURCE:  COUR  SUPRÊME  DU  CANADA  (613) 995‑4330

                                                                                                  

 

1.             Her Majesty the Queen v. Trevor Middleton, et al (Crim.)(Ont.)(26860)

 

2.             Bot Construction Limited v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Ontario, et al (Ont.)(26758)

 

3.             Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation, District 9 v. Peter G. Barton, et al (Ont.)(26911)

 

4.             Century Services Inc., formerly known as Century Disposals Inc. v. ZI Corporation, formerly known as Multi-Corp. Inc. (Alta.)(26983)

 

5.             Jordan Ward v. Government of Saskatchewan (Sask.)(26991)

 

6.         9004-6673 Québec Inc. c. Roxboro Excavation Inc., et al (Qué.)(26815)

 

7.         Marsha Bassi, et al v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, et al (Ont.)(26890)

 

8.         Mr. Justice John E. Sheppard v. The Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs (F.C.A.)(Ont.)(26949)

 

9.         Mr. Justice Thomas A. Beckett v. The Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs (F.C.A.)(Ont.)(26958).

 

10.        Sassine Georges Sreih c. Sa Majesté la Reine (Crim.)(Qué.)(26762)

 

11.        Dale Martin v. The Rural Municipality of St. Andrews (Man.)(26946).

 

12.           Douglas A. Woodward v. Stelco Inc. (Ont.) (26865)

 

13.           Mark Edward Russell v. Her Majesty the Queen (Crim.) (Alta.) (26699)

 

14.           Ebco Industries Ltd. v. Discovery Enterprises Inc. (B.C.) (26817)

 

15.           David Murray-Audain v. Corporation of the town of Newcastle, Leonard Cremer, Donald Paterson, Franklin Wu, and Newcastle Salvage (Ont.) (26913)

 

 

 


IN THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION FOR RECONSIDERATION - DANS LA DEMANDE SUIVANTE DE RÉEXAMEN:

 

1.             Freda Evelyn Langenhahn and Robert Leslie Langenhahn v. Richard M. Czyz and Richard M. Czyz Professional Corporation (Alta.) (26710)

 

 

AND IN THE FOLLOWING APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE TO CROSS-APPEAL - ET DANS LES DEMANDES DAUTORISATION DAPPEL INCIDENT SUIVANTES:

 

1.             Her Majesty the Queen v. Norman Groot (Crim.) (Ont.) (26929)

 

2.             Shell Canada Limited v. Her Majesty the Queen (F.C.A.) (Alta.) (26596)

 

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.