News Releases

Decision Information

Decision Content

SUPREME COURT OF CANADA ‑‑ JUDGMENTS TO BE RENDERED IN LEAVE APPLICATIONS

OTTAWA, 19/12/00.  THE  SUPREME  COURT  OF  CANADA  ANNOUNCED  TODAY  THAT  JUDGMENT  IN  THE  FOLLOWING  APPLICATIONS  FOR  LEAVE  TO  APPEAL  WILL  BE  DELIVERED  AT  9:45  A.M.  ON  THURSDAY,  DECEMBER  21,  2000.  THIS  LIST  IS  SUBJECT  TO  CHANGE.

FROM:  SUPREME  COURT  OF  CANADA  (613) 995‑4330

 

COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA ‑‑ PROCHAINS JUGEMENTS SUR DEMANDES D’AUTORISATION

OTTAWA, 19/12/00.  LA  COUR  SUPRÊME  DU  CANADA  ANNONCE  QUE  JUGEMENT  SERA  RENDU  DANS  LES  DEMANDES  D'AUTORISATION  D'APPEL  SUIVANTES  LE  JEUDI  21  DÉCEMBRE  2000, À 9 H 45.  CETTE  LISTE  EST  SUJETTE  À  MODIFICATIONS.

SOURCE:  COUR  SUPRÊME  DU  CANADA  (613) 995‑4330

 

 

1.             The Corporation of the City of Mississauga, The Corporation of the Town of Oakville ‑ v. ‑ Slough Estates Canada Limited, Slough/Marwood Developments Limited, Winston Office Parks Limited, Menkes Industrial Parks Limited, 745629 Ontario Limited, Stellar Construction Enterprises Limited, 779008 Ontario Limited and Ontario Property Assessment Corporation (formerly Regional Assessment Commissioner, Region No. 15) ‑ and between ‑ Ontario Property Assessment Corporation (formerly Regional Assessment Commissioner, Region No. 15) ‑ v. ‑ Slough Estates Canada Limited, Slough/Marwood Developments Limited, Winston Office Parks Limited, Menkes Industrial Parks Limited, 745629 Ontario Limited, Stellar Construction Enterprises Limited, 779008 Ontario Limited, The Corporation of the City of Mississauga and The Corporation of the Town of Oakville (Ont.) (Civil) (By Leave) (27951)

 

2.             Clemence Roles and Joan Roles ‑ v. ‑ 306972 Saskatchewan Ltd., Art Shoquist, Gwen Shoquist, Grant Walters, Len Walters, Bruno Riemer and Pam Riemer (Sask.) (Civil) (By Leave) (27864)

 

3.             Peter Fehr ‑ v. ‑ Roman Brodowski and Grey Goose Corporation Limited (Man.) (Civil) (By Leave) (28023)

 

4.             Hazel Jacko, et al v.  Her Majesty the Queen (Alta.) (28109)

 

5.             Estate of Marie Vyna Ruman v.  the Municipal Corporation of the City of Yellowknife (N.W.T.) (27974)

 

6.             Huguette Doiron c. Olivier Lipp, et al (Qué.) (27940)

 

7.             L’Ordre des chiropraticiens du Québec c. Philippe Thomas (Qué.) (27871)

 

8.             Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, et al v.  Samos Investments Inc. et al (B.C.) (28012)

 

 

AND IN THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION FOR RECONSIDERATION - ET DANS LA DEMANDE SUIVANTE DE RÉEXAMEN:

 

1.             Brian William Kiloh ‑ v. ‑ Her Majesty the Queen (FC) (Civil) (27511)

 

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.