Communiqués

Informations sur la décision

Contenu de la décision

SUPREME COURT OF CANADA ‑‑ JUDGMENTS TO BE RENDERED IN LEAVE APPLICATIONS

OTTAWA, 17/3/03.  THE  SUPREME  COURT  OF  CANADA  ANNOUNCED  TODAY  THAT  JUDGMENT  IN  THE  FOLLOWING  APPLICATIONS  FOR  LEAVE  TO  APPEAL  WILL  BE  DELIVERED  AT  9:45  A.M.  ON  THURSDAY,  MARCH  20,  2003.  THIS  LIST  IS  SUBJECT  TO  CHANGE.

FROM:  SUPREME  COURT  OF  CANADA  (613) 995‑4330

 

COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA ‑‑ PROCHAINS JUGEMENTS SUR DEMANDES D’AUTORISATION

OTTAWA, 17/3/03.  LA  COUR  SUPRÊME  DU  CANADA  ANNONCE  QUE  JUGEMENT  SERA  RENDU  DANS  LES  DEMANDES  D'AUTORISATION  D'APPEL  SUIVANTES  LE  JEUDI  20  MARS  2003,  À  9 H 45.  CETTE  LISTE  EST  SUJETTE  À  MODIFICATIONS.

SOURCE:  COUR  SUPRÊME  DU  CANADA  (613) 995‑4330

 

COMMENTS/COMMENTAIRES: comments@scc-csc.gc.ca

 

1.             Director, Income Maintenance Branch, Ministry of Community and Social Services, et al. v. Sandra Falkiner, Deborah Sears, Cynthia Johnston-Pepping and Claude Marie Cadieux (Ont.)(Civil) (29294)

 

2.             The Minister of Human Resources Development Canada v. Betty Hodge (FC)(Civil) (29351)

 

3.             The Minister of Forests, et al. v. Council of the Haida Nation and Guujaaw, on their own behalf and on behalf of all members of the Haida Nation, et al. (B.C.)(Civil) (29419)

 

4.             Board of School Trustees of Regional Administrative Unit #3 v. Richard W. Morin  (P.E.I.)(Civil) (29417)

 

5.             Robert Kenneth Hartshorne v. Kathleen Mary Mildred Hartshorne (B.C.)(Civil) (29531)

 

6.             The City of Calgary v. The United Taxi Drivers’ Fellowship of Southern Alberta, et al. (Alta.)(Civil) (29321)

 

7.             Michael Bogart v. Her Majesty the Queen (Ont.) (Criminal) (By Leave) (29310)

 

8.             Sarg Oils Ltd. v. The Energy Resources Conservation Board, et al. (Alta.) (Civil) (By Leave) (29314)

 

9.             Robert Silver, et al. v. The Business Development Corporation formely known as The Federal Business Development Bank, et al. (N.S.) (Civil) (By Leave) )29381)

 

10.           Dr. Kazi K. Bakht v. Minister of Human Resources Development, Canada (FC) (Civil) (By Leave) (29340)

 

11.           John Howard Teskey v. Mike Grzelak (Ont.) (Civil) (By Leave) (29402)

 

12.           Enid Robitaille, et al. v. Anspor Construction Limited, et al. (Ont.) (Civil) (By Leave) (29363)

 

13.           Krystyna Brebric, et al. v. Ivan Niksic (Ont.) (Civil) (By Leave) (29388)

 

14.           Archean Resources Ltd. v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Newfoundland and Labrador, et al. (T.L.) (Civil) (By Leave) (29390)

 

15.           Myra M.D. Simanek v. Garry Lamourie (Ont.) (Civil) (By Leave) (29384)

 

16.           Smithkline Beecham Pharma Inc., et al. v. Apotex Inc. et al. (FC) (Civil) (By Leave)  (29328)


17.           Russell Deigan v. Attorney General of Canada (Industry Canada) (FC) (Civil) (By Leave) (29404)

 

18.           Municipality of the County of Antigonish v. Town of Antigonish (N.S.) (Civil) (By Leave) (29378)

 

19.           Syntex (U.S.A) L.L.C., et al. v. The Minister of Health, et al. (FC) (Civil) (By Leave) (29396)

 

20.           Water's Edge Village Estates (Phase II) Ltd., et al. v. Her Majesty the Queen (FCA) (Civil) (29392)

 

21.           Magnaflex Industries Inc. v. Victoria Park Avenue Associates Limited Partnership, et al. (Ont.) (Civil) (By Leave)  (29448)

 

22.           Karen L. Turner‑Lienaux, et al. v. Wesley G. Campbell (N.S.) (Civil) (By Leave) (29407)

 

23.           Sinclair‑Cockburn Insurance Brokers Limited v. Linda Anne Richards, et al. (Ont.) (Civil) (By Leave) (29431)

 

24.           Guangshu Li, et al. v. Nina Li, et al. (Ont.) (Civil) (By Leave) (29478)

 

25.           Barbara Parravano, et al. v. KPMG Incorporated, et al. (Ont.) (Civil) (By Leave) (29464)

 

26.           Daniel Edward Webb v. Waterloo Regional Police Services Board, et al. (Ont.) (Civil) (By Leave) (29397)

 

 

 

 Vous allez être redirigé vers la version la plus récente de la loi, qui peut ne pas être la version considérée au moment où le jugement a été rendu.