SUPREME COURT OF CANADA ‐‐ JUDGMENTS TO BE RENDERED IN LEAVE APPLICATIONS
OTTAWA, 16/2/98. THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA ANNOUNCED TODAY THAT JUDGMENT IN THE FOLLOWING APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL WILL BE DELIVERED AT 9:45 A.M. ON THURSDAY FEBRUARY 19, 1998. THIS LIST IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
FROM: SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (613) 995‐4330
COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA ‐‐ PROCHAINS JUGEMENTS DANS DEMANDES D’AUTORISATION
OTTAWA, 16/2/98. LA COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA ANNONCE QUE JUGEMENT SERA RENDU DANS LES DEMANDES D'AUTORISATION D'APPEL SUIVANTES LE JEUDI 19 FÉVRIER 1998, À 9 H 45. CETTE LISTE EST SUJETTE À MODIFICATIONS.
SOURCE: COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA (613) 995‐4330
1. City of Surrey v. McIntosh Estates Ltd., et al (B.C.)(26266)
2. Jonathan Trelawny Silbernagel v. Canadian Stevedoring Co. Ltd., et al (B.C.)(26291)
3. Ismail Abrahams v. Holly Elaine Scott (B.C.)(26224)
4. Steven Olah v. Her Majesty the Queen (Crim.)(Ont.)(26280)
5. Ontario Adult Entertainment Bar Association v. The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto (Ont.)(26325)
6. Tuyen Minh Dang v. Her Majesty the Queen (Crim.)(Alta.)(26285)
7. M-Jay Farms Enterprises Ltd., suing on its own behalf and on behalf of all other holders of permit v. Canadian Wheat Board (Man.)(26346)
8. Minister of Economic Development and Tourism, et al v. Municipal Corporation of the City of Yellowknife (N.W.T.)(26337)
9. New Investors Committee of Mater’s Mortgages v. Peat Marwick Thorne Inc. (Ont.)(26179)
10. J. Sidney Bradley v. Her Majesty the Queen (F.C.A.)(Ont.)(26308)
11. Service Employees Union, Local 210 v. The Sisters of St. Joseph of the Diocese of London in Ontario, operating St. Joseph’s Hospital, Chatham, et al (Ont.)(26233)
12. Steven Allen Turner and Lorelei Turner v. Her Majesty the Queen (N.B.)(26264)
13. Mary Fritz v. Pimm Investments Limited and Metske Veenstrann Turner (Ont.)(26349)
14. Denis Lucien Lepage v. Her Majesty the Queen (Crim.)(Ont.)(26320)
15. Mary Lawlor v. M.J. Oppenheim, C.A. Attorney in fact in Canada for Lloyd’s Non-Marine Underwriters (Nfld.)(26212)
AND IN THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION FOR RECONSIDERATION / ET DANS LA DEMANDE SUIVANTE DE RÉEXAMEN:
1. Edward Lian‐Seng Wen v. Canadian Airlines International Ltd., et al (B.C.)(25653)