Supreme Court Judgments

Decision Information

Decision Content

R. v. Dubasz, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 759

 

Her Majesty The Queen                                                                   Appellant

 

v.

 

William John Dubasz   Respondent

 

Indexed as:  R. v. Dubasz

 

File No.:  23978.

 

1994:  November 10.

 

Present:  Sopinka, Gonthier, Cory, Iacobucci and Major JJ.

 

on appeal from the court of appeal from alberta

 

                   Criminal law ‑‑ Manslaughter ‑‑ Court of Appeal erring in setting aside conviction.

 

                   APPEAL from a judgment of the Alberta Court of Appeal (1994), 149 A.R. 59, 63 W.A.C. 59, quashing the accused's conviction for manslaughter. Appeal allowed.

 

                   Paul C. Bourque, for the appellant.

 

                   David B. Mercer, for the respondent.

 

                   The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by

 

                   Sopinka J. ‑‑ For the reasons of Foisy J.A., dissenting, in the Court of Appeal, we agree that the majority of the Court of Appeal erred in setting aside the conviction.  The appeal is allowed, the judgment of the Court of Appeal is set aside and the conviction at trial is restored.  The matter is remitted to the Court of Appeal to deal with the appeal as to sentence.

 

                   Judgment accordingly.

 

                   Solicitor for the appellant:  Paul C. Bourque, Edmonton.

 

                   Solicitors for the respondent:  Nickerson Roberts, Edmonton.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.