Supreme Court Judgments

Decision Information

Decision Content

 

SUPREME COURT OF CANADA

 

Citation:  R. v. Koczab, 2014 SCC 9, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 138

Date: 20140122

Docket: 35411

 

Between:

Andy Koczab

Appellant

and

Her Majesty The Queen

Respondent

 

Coram:  McLachlin C.J. and Abella, Rothstein, Cromwell and Moldaver JJ.

 

Reasons for Judgment:

(para. 1)

McLachlin C.J. (Abella, Rothstein, Cromwell and Moldaver JJ. concurring)

 

R. v. Koczab, 2014 SCC 9, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 138

Andy Koczab                                                                                                  Appellant

v.

Her Majesty The Queen                                                                              Respondent

Indexed as:  R. v. Koczab

2014 SCC 9

File No.:  35411.

2014:  January 22.

Present:  McLachlin C.J. and Abella, Rothstein, Cromwell and Moldaver JJ.

on appeal from the court of appeal for manitoba

                    Constitutional law Charter of rights  — Right to be informed of offence charged — Right to counsel — Psychological detention — Trial judge did not err in finding accused psychologically detained and s. 10  Charter  rights breached — Breach warranted that evidence be excluded Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, ss. 10 , 24(2) .

 

                    APPEAL from a judgment of the Manitoba Court of Appeal (Chartier C.J.M. and Beard and Monnin JJ.A.), 2013 MBCA 43, 294 Man. R. (2d) 24, 581 W.A.C. 24, [2013] 11 W.W.R. 260, [2013] M.J. No. 160 (QL), 2013 CarswellMan 251, setting aside an acquittal entered by Schulman J., 2011 MBQB 70, 264 Man. R. (2d) 53, 233 C.R.R. (2d) 193, [2011] M.J. No. 106 (QL), 2011 CarswellMan 140, and ordering a new trial.  Appeal allowed.

 

                    Sheldon E. Pinx, Q.C., and Katherine E. Smith, for the appellant.

 

                    Kevin R. Wilson and Janna Hyman, for the respondent.

 

                    The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by

[1]               The Chief Justice — The appeal is allowed for the reasons of Monnin J.A., dissenting in the Court of Appeal.

                    Judgment accordingly.

                    Solicitors for the appellant:  Pinx & Co., Winnipeg.

                    Solicitor for the respondent:  Public Prosecution Service of Canada, Toronto and Winnipeg.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.