Supreme Court Judgments

Decision Information

Decision Content

R. v. Mullins‑Johnson, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 977

 

William Mullins‑Johnson                                                                   Appellant

 

v.

 

Her Majesty The Queen                                                                   Respondent

 

Indexed as:  R. v. Mullins‑Johnson

 

File No.:  25860.

 

1998:  May 26.

 

Present:  L’Heureux‑Dubé, Gonthier, McLachlin, Bastarache and Binnie JJ.

 

on appeal from the court of appeal for ontario

 

Criminal law ‑‑ Charge to jury ‑‑ Trial judge adequately explaining defence position to jury.

 

APPEAL from a judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal (1996), 31 O.R. (3d) 660, 96 O.A.C. 212, 112 C.C.C. (3d) 117, [1996] O.J. No. 4459 (QL), dismissing the accused’s appeal from his conviction on a charge of first degree murder. Appeal dismissed.

 

Michael Lomer, for the appellant.

 


Scott C. Hutchison and Philip Downes, for the respondent.

 

The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by

 

1                 L’Heureux‑Dubé J. ‑‑ This is an appeal as of right.  We are all of the view that this appeal be dismissed for the reasons of the majority of the Court of Appeal.

 

Judgment accordingly.

 

Solicitors for the appellant:  Lomer, Frost, Toronto.

 

Solicitor for the respondent:  The Ministry of the Attorney General, Toronto.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.