Supreme Court Judgments

Decision Information

Decision Content

R. v. Scott, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 425, 2001 SCC 73

 

Terrance Blake Scott                                                                                       Appellant

 

v.

 

Her Majesty The Queen                                                                               Respondent

 

Indexed as:  R. v. Scott

 

Neutral citation:  2001 SCC 73.

 

File No.:  27781.

 

2001:  November 9.

 

Present:  McLachlin C.J. and  Major, Bastarache, Binnie and LeBel JJ.

 

on appeal from the court of appeal for british columbia

 

Criminal law – Robbery – Imitation firearm -- Accused charged with using imitation firearm in commission of robbery – Meaning of term “imitation”.

 

APPEAL from a judgment of the British Columbia Court of Appeal (2000), 136 B.C.A.C. 161, 222 W.A.C. 161, 145 C.C.C. (3d) 52, 34 C.R. (5th) 322, [2000] B.C.J. No. 800 (QL), 2000 BCCA 220, setting aside the accused’s acquittal on two counts of using an imitation firearm in the commission of a robbery.  Appeal dismissed.


Peter Hertzberg, for the appellant.

 

Cal Deedman, for the respondent.

 

The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by

 

1                                The Chief Justice We are all of the view that the appeal should be dismissed substantially for the reasons of Chief Justice McEachern.

 

Judgment accordingly.

 

Solicitors for the appellant:  Stacey, Strain & Hertzberg, Nanaimo.

 

Solicitor for the respondent:  The Ministry of the Attorney General, Vancouver.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.