Supreme Court Judgments

Decision Information

Decision Content

Paul D’Aoust Construction Ltd. v. Markel Insurance Co. of Canada, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 744, 2001 SCC 84

 

Paul D’Aoust Construction Ltd. and

the Carleton Roman Catholic Separate School Board                                 Appellants

 

v.

 

Markel Insurance Company of Canada

and Kenneth Daku                                                                                       Respondents

 

Indexed as:  Paul D’Aoust Construction Ltd. v. Markel Insurance Co. of Canada

 

Neutral citation:  2001 SCC 84.

 

File No.:  27438.

 

2001:  December 5.

 

Present:  Gonthier, Iacobucci, Major, Bastarache, Binnie, Arbour and LeBel JJ.

 

on appeal from the court of appeal for ontario

 

Commercial law -- Construction -- Performance bonds -- Delivery -- Contractor signing bond with bond company -- Bond not delivered to owner -- Delivery required to make bond effective.

 


APPEAL from a judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal (1999), 45 C.L.R. (2d) 65, 120 O.A.C. 243, [1999] O.J. No. 1837 (QL), affirming a judgment of the Ontario Court  (General Division) (1996), 31 C.L.R. (2d) 180, [1996] O.J. No. 4159 (QL).  Appeal dismissed.

 

K. Scott McLean, for the appellants.

 

Ronald W. Price, for the respondent Markel Insurance Company of Canada.

 

Kenneth Radnoff, Q.C., for the respondent Daku.

 

The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by

 

1                                Gonthier J. -- We are all of the view that the appeal should be dismissed for the reasons of the Court of Appeal of Ontario, with costs.

 

Judgment accordingly.

 

Solicitors for the appellants:  Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt, Ottawa.

 

Solicitors for the respondent Markel Insurance Company of Canada:  Rasmussen Starr Ruddy, Ottawa.

 

Solicitors for the respondent Daku:  Radnoff Pearl Slover Swedko Dwoskin, Ottawa.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.