Supreme Court Judgments

Decision Information

Decision Content

SUPREME COURT OF CANADA

 

 

Citation: R. v. Badger, 2022 SCC 20

 

 

Appeal Heard: May 16, 2022

Judgment Rendered: May 16, 2022

Docket: 39844

 

Between:

 

Jacob Charles Badger

Appellant

 

and

 

Her Majesty The Queen

Respondent

 

 

 

Coram: Moldaver, Karakatsanis, Côté, Brown and Martin JJ.

 

 

Judgment Read By:

(para. 1)

Moldaver J.

 

Majority:

Moldaver, Côté and Brown JJ.

 

Dissent:

Karakatsanis and Martin JJ.

 

Counsel:

 

Thomas Hynes and Zachary Carter, for the appellant.

Grace Hession David, for the respondent.

 

 

 

Note: This document is subject to editorial revision before its reproduction in final form in the Canada Supreme Court Reports.

 

 

 

 


 

No. 39844     

 

May 17, 2022

 

Le 17 mai 2022

 

 

 

Coram: Moldaver, Karakatsanis, Côté, Brown and Martin JJ.

 

Coram : Les juges Moldaver, Karakatsanis, Côté, Brown et Martin

 

 

 

 

BETWEEN:

Jacob Charles Badger

Appellant

- and -

 

Her Majesty The Queen

Respondent

 

 

ENTRE :

Jacob Charles Badger

Appelant

- et -

 

Sa Majesté la Reine

Intimée

 

 

 

JUDGMENT

 

The appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan, Number CACR3347, 2021 SKCA 118, dated September 1, 2021, was heard on May 16, 2022, and the Court on that day delivered the following judgment orally:

 

 

 

Moldaver J. — A majority of the Court would dismiss the appeal, substantially for the reasons of the majority of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal. Justices Karakatsanis and Martin would allow the appeal, substantially for the reasons of the dissenting judge of the Court of Appeal.

 

 

 

JUGEMENT

 

L’appel interjeté contre l’arrêt de la Cour d’appel de la Saskatchewan, numéro CACR3347, 2021 SKCA 118, daté du 1er septembre 2021, a été entendu le 16 mai 2022 et la Cour a prononcé oralement le même jour le jugement suivant :

 

[traduction]

Le juge Moldaver — La Cour, à la majorité, est d’avis de rejeter l’appel, essentiellement pour les motifs exposés par les juges majoritaires de la Cour d’appel de la Saskatchewan. Les juges Karakatsanis et Martin auraient accueilli l’appel, principalement pour les motifs du juge dissident de la Cour d’appel.

 

 

 

 

 

J.S.C.C.

J.C.S.C.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.