Supreme Court Judgments

Decision Information

Decision Content

Supreme Court of Canada

Criminal law—Conspiracy—Trafficking in controlled drug—Evidence—Trial judge allowing motion for non-suit—Proof of accused’s membership in conspiracy—Whether co-conspirators’ acts and declarations admissible to that end.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal (1981), 63 C.C.C. (2d) 321, allowing the Crown’s appeal from a judgment of McMahon J., acquitting the accused of conspiring to traffic in a controlled drug contrary to s. 34(1) of the Food and Drugs Act and s. 423(1)(d) of the Criminal Code, and ordering a new trial. Appeal dismissed.

Andrew Kerekes, for the appellant.

Michael Dambrot, for the respondent.

The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by

THE CHIEF JUSTICE—It will not be necessary to hear you Mr. Dambrot. The Court is in agreement with the conclusion reached by the Court of Appeal for Ontario and with the reasons therefor expressed by Mr. Justice Martin, speaking for the Court.

The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Judgment accordingly.

Solicitors for the appellant: Kerekes, Collins, Toronto.

Solicitor for the respondent: R. Tassé, Ottawa.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.