Supreme Court Judgments

Decision Information

Decision Content

Arthur D. Little Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand (Application), [1989] 2 S.C.R. 981

 

Arthur D. Little Inc. and

Arthur D. Little of Canada Ltd.                                                                                       Appellants

 

v.

 

Coopers & Lybrand (formerly known

as MacDonald, Currie & Co.)   Respondent

 

and

 

Newman, MacLean & Associates                                                                                   Respondent

 

indexed as:  arthur d. little inc. v. coopers & lybrand (application)

 

File No.:  20521.

 

1989:  October 13.

 

Present:  Wilson J.

 

application to vary a judgment

 

    Practice -- Application to vary a judgment -- Settlement as between Arthur D. Little and Newman, MacLean & Associates at the outset of the hearing of the appeal -- Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada, SOR/83‑74, ss. 5, 50(1), (2).

 

    APPLICATION to vary a judgment, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 293.

 

    Application allowed.

 

//Wilson J.//

 

    WILSON J. -- The judgment of the Court is varied to read as follows:

 

    On consent, the appeal as against Newman, MacLean & Associates is dismissed without costs.

 

    The appeal as against Coopers & Lybrand (formerly known as MacDonald, Currie & Co.) is allowed, the order of the Court of Appeal set aside, and the order of Scollin J. reinstated.  Costs to the appellants both here and in the Court of Appeal in the cause.

 

    Judgment accordingly.

 

    Solicitors for the appellants:  Monk, Goodwin, Winnipeg.

 

    Solicitors for the respondent Coopers & Lybrand:  Aikins, MacAulay & Thorvaldson, Winnipeg.

 

    Solicitors for the respondent Newman, MacLean & Associates:  Tallin & Kristjansson, Winnipeg.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.