Supreme Court Judgments

Decision Information

Decision Content

Supreme Court of Canada

Civil procedure—Amendment—Incorrect description of plaintiff—Company name substituted for that of plaintiff—Prescription period expired—Whether amendment contrary to the ends of justice—Code of Civil Procedure, art. 203.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Quebec Court of Appeal, [1981] C.A. 308, setting aside a judgment of the Superior Court, [1980] C.S. 141, dismissing respondent’s verbal motion to amend his writ of summons and declaration. Appeal dismissed.

François Lamarre, for the appellant the Corporation municipale de St-David de Falardeau.

Robert Gauthier, for the appellant the Attorney General of the Province of Quebec.

Richard Dufour, for the respondent.

English version of the judgment of the Court delivered orally by

DICKSON J.—In view of the circumstances of this case, as set out in the reasons of the judges of the Court of Appeal, we are all of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for the specific reasons stated by Montgomery J.A. The respondent is entitled to his costs in this Court.

Judgment accordingly.

[Page 244]

Solicitors for the appellant the Corporation municipale de St-David de Falardeau: Bergeron, Cain, Lamarre & Associés, Chicoutimi.

Solicitors for the appellant the Attorney General of the Province of Quebec: Turcotte, Gauthier & Fortin, Jonquière.

Solicitors for the respondent: Dufour, Côté and Laperrière, Chicoutimi.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.