Supreme Court Judgments

Decision Information

R. v. Hawkins

Collection Supreme Court Judgments
Date 1992-11-02
Report [1992] 3 SCR 463
Case number 22812, 22952
Judges La Forest, Gérard V.; Sopinka, John; Cory, Peter deCarteret; McLachlin, Beverley; Iacobucci, Frank
On appeal from Ontario
Subjects Constitutional law
Notes SCC Case Information: 22952, 22812

Decision Content

R. v. Hawkins, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 463

 

Kevin Hawkins            Appellant

 

v.

 

Her Majesty The Queen                                                                   Respondent

 

and

 

Claude Morin               Appellant

 

v.

 

Her Majesty The Queen                                                                   Respondent

 

Indexed as:  R. v. Hawkins

 

File Nos.:  22952, 22812.

 

1992:  November 2.

 

Present:  La Forest, Sopinka, Cory, McLachlin and Iacobucci JJ.

 

on appeal from the court of appeal for ontario

 

                   Constitutional law ‑‑ Charter of Rights  ‑‑ Section 11(b) right to trial within reasonable time ‑‑ Three‑year delay and recantation of Crown witness ‑‑ Court of Appeal setting aside stay of proceedings ‑‑ Principles enunciated in R. v. Morin applied ‑‑ No unreasonable delay ‑‑  Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s. 11(b) .

 

Cases Cited

 

                   Applied:  R. v. Morin, [1992] 1 S.C.R. 771.

 

Statutes and Regulations Cited

 

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms , s. 11 ( b ) .

 

                   APPEAL from a judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal (1991), 6 O.R. (3d) 724, 52 O.A.C. 114, allowing an appeal from a judgment of Lesage J. and setting aside stay of proceedings and remitting proceedings to trial.  Appeals dismissed.

 

                   David E. Harris, for the appellant Kevin Hawkins.

 

                   Harald Mattson and Mark Ertel, for the appellant Claude Morin.

 

                   David Butt, for the respondent.

 

//Sopinka J.//

 

                   The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by

 

                   Sopinka J. ‑‑ In these appeals as of right, the Court of Appeal did not have the benefit of this Court's reasons in R. v. Morin, [1992] 1 S.C.R. 771, when it decided these cases.  While we do not necessarily agree with all the reasons of the Court of Appeal, we are all of the view that, applying the principles expressed in Morin, supra, the Court of Appeal reached the right result.  Based on those principles, there was no unreasonable delay within the meaning of s. 11( b )  of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms .  Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed.  In the circumstances an order should go expediting the trial.

 

                   Judgment accordingly.

 

                   Solicitors for the appellant Kevin Hawkins:  Carter, McCombs & Minden, Toronto.

 

                   Solicitor for the appellant Claude Morin:  Harald Mattson, Kitchener.

 

                   Solicitor for the respondent:  The Ministry of the Attorney General, Toronto.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.