Applications for Leave

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                                                                                                   No. 33106   

 

 

 


June 11, 2009

 

Le 11 juin 2009

 

 

 

Coram:  McLachlin C.J. and LeBel and Cromwell JJ.

 

Coram : La juge en chef McLachlin et les juges LeBel et Cromwell

 

 

 

 

BETWEEN:

 

Albert Sewell

 

Applicant

 

‑ and ‑

 

George Botros, spouse of George Botros, Mouris Botros, Raga Botros,  4188381 Canada Inc., Zia Rehman, Rod A. Vanier, St. Georges and St. Antony Coptic Orthodox Church of Ottawa, Father Mikhael Fam, Stephane Lalonde, First Estate Realty Limited, Al Hasan Harb, David Debenham, Gordon Greenwood, Paul Muirhead, Gordon Cameron and Robert Houston

 

Respondents

 

 

 

ENTRE :

 

Albert Sewell

 

Demandeur

 

‑ et ‑

 

George Botros, spouse of George Botros, Mouris Botros, Raga Botros,  4188381 Canada Inc., Zia Rehman, Rod A. Vanier, St. Georges et St. Antony Coptic Orthodox Church of Ottawa, Father Mikhael Fam, Stephane Lalonde, First Estate Realty Limited, Al Hasan Harb, David Debenham, Gordon Greenwood, Paul Muirhead, Gordon Cameron et Robert Houston

 

Intimés

                                   

 

 

 

                         JUDGMENT

 

The application for an extension of time is granted and the application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Number M36591(C48614), 2007 ONCA 625, dated January 26, 2009, is dismissed with costs to the respondents Gordon Greenwood, Paul Muirhead, Stephane LaLonde, David Debenham, Gordon Cameron and Robert Houston.

 

 

                          JUGEMENT

 

La demande de prorogation de délai est accordée et la demande d’autorisation d’appel de l’arrêt de la Cour d’appel de l’Ontario, numéro M36591(C48614), 2007 ONCA 625, daté du 26 janvier 2009, est rejetée avec dépens en faveur des intimés Gordon Greenwood, Paul Muirhead, Stephane LaLonde, David Debenham, Gordon Cameron et Robert Houston.

 

 

 

 


 


                                                                         C.J.C.

                                                                         J.C.C.

 

                                                                             

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.