Applications for Leave

Decision Information

Blair T. Longley, Kevin Peck, Miguel Figueroa, Jim Harris, Marijuana Party, Canadian Action Party, Communist Party of Canada, Green Party of Canada, Christian Heritage Party and Progressive Canadian Party v. Attorney General of Canada

Collection Applications for Leave
Date 2008-04-24
Case number 32459
Judges Bastarache, Michel; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Charron, Louise

Decision Content

32459                                                  No. 32459   

 

                                                                             


April 24, 2008

 

Le 24 avril 2008

 

 

 

Coram:  Bastarache, Abella and Charron JJ.

 

Coram : Les juges Bastarache, Abella et Charron

 

 

 

 

BETWEEN:

 

Blair T. Longley, Kevin Peck, Miguel Figueroa, Jim Harris, Marijuana Party, Canadian Action Party, Communist Party of Canada, Green Party of Canada, Christian Heritage Party and Progressive Canadian Party

 

Applicants

 

‑ and ‑

 

Attorney General of Canada

 

Respondent

 

 

 

ENTRE :

 

Blair T. Longley, Kevin Peck, Miguel Figueroa, Jim Harris, Parti Marijuana, Parti action canadienne, Parti Communiste du Canada, Parti Vert du Canada, Parti de l’Héritage Chrétien et Parti Progressiste Canadien

 

Demandeurs

 

‑ et ‑

 

Procureur général du Canada

 

Intimé

                                   

 

 

 

                         JUDGMENT

 

The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Number C46236, 2007 ONCA 852, dated December 6, 2007, is dismissed.

 

 

                          JUGEMENT

 

La demande d’autorisation d’appel de l’arrêt de la Cour d’appel de l’Ontario, numéro C46236, 2007 ONCA 852, daté du 6 décembre 2007, est rejetée.

 

 

 

 

                                                                             

 

                                                                        J.S.C.C.

                                                                        J.C.S.C.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.