Applications for Leave

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                                                                                                                           No. 31878   

 

 

 


September 6, 2007

 

Le 6 septembre 2007

 

 

 

Coram:  Bastarache, LeBel and Fish JJ.

 

Coram : Les juges Bastarache, LeBel et Fish

 

 

 


 

BETWEEN:

 

Société Générale (Canada) and Bert Coish

 

Applicants

 

‑ and ‑

 

Royal Bank of Canada, American Home Assurance Company, Chubb Insurance Company of Canada, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company of Canada as represented by Liberty International Canada, Gulf Insurance Company UK Ltd.,  and Lloyds Syndicates 204 (R.A. Edwards), 1007 (SVB Villers), 435 (DP Mann) & 1212 (SVB Burnhope) respecting  Policy No. MMF/1395

 

Respondents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                         JUDGMENT

 

The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Numbers C44657 and C44659, dated December 21, 2006, is dismissed with costs to the respondent Royal Bank of Canada.

 

 

 

ENTRE :

 

Société Générale (Canada) et Bert Coish

 

Demandeurs

 

‑ et ‑

 

Banque Royale du Canada, American Home Assurance Company, Chubb Insurance Company of Canada, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company of Canada as represented by Liberty International Canada, Gulf Insurance Company UK Ltd., et Lloyds Syndicates 204 (R.A. Edwards), 1007 (SVB Villers), 435 (DP Mann) & 1212 (SVB Burnhope) respecting  Policy No. MMF/1395

 

Intimées

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  JUGEMENT

 

La demande dautorisation dappel de larrêt de la Cour dappel de lOntario, numéros C44657 et C44659, daté du 21 décembre 2006, est rejetée avec dépens en faveur de lintimée Banque Royale du Canada.

 

 

 

                                   

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

                                                                             

                                                                        J.S.C.C.

                                                                        J.C.S.C.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.