Applications for Leave

March 25, 2010

Le 25 mars 2010

Coram:  Binnie, Fish and Charron JJ.

Coram : Les juges Binnie, Fish et Charron

BETWEEN:

Donald Sproule, David D. Archibald and Michael Campbell on their own behalf and on behalf of Former Employees of Nortel Networks Corporation, Nortel Networks Limited, Nortel Networks Global Corporation, Nortel Networks International Corporation and Nortel Networks Technology Corporation

Applicants

‑ and ‑

Nortel Networks Corporation, Nortel Networks Limited, Nortel Networks Global Corporation, Nortel Networks International Corporation, Nortel Networks Technology Corporation, Board of Directors of Nortel Networks Corporation and Nortel Networks Limited, Informal Nortel Noteholder Group, Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors and Ernst & Young Inc. in its capacity as Monitor

Respondents

ENTRE :

Donald Sproule, David D. Archibald and Michael Campbell on their own behalf and on behalf of Former Employees of Nortel Networks Corporation, Nortel Networks Limited, Nortel Networks Global Corporation, Nortel Networks International Corporation et Nortel Networks Technology Corporation

Demandeurs

‑ et ‑

Nortel Networks Corporation, Nortel Networks Limited, Nortel Networks Global Corporation, Nortel Networks International Corporation, Nortel Networks Technology Corporation, Board of Directors of Nortel Networks Corporation and Nortel Networks Limited, Informal Nortel Noteholder Group, Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors et Ernst & Young Inc. in its capacity as Monitor

Intimés

                                                JUDGMENT

The motions for directions and to expedite the application for leave to appeal are dismissed.  The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Number C50986, 2009 ONCA 833, dated November 26, 2009, is dismissed with no order as to costs.

                          JUGEMENT

La requête en vue d’obtenir des directives et la requête visant à accélérer la procédure de demande d’autorisation d’appel sont rejetées.  La demande d’autorisation d’appel à l’encontre de l’arrêt de la Cour d’appel de l’Ontario, numéro C50986, 2009 ONCA 833, daté du 26 novembre 2009, est rejetée; aucune ordonnance n’est rendue concernant les dépens.