Applications for Leave

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                                                                                                                           No. 31255   

 

 

 


April 13, 2006

 

Le 13 avril 2006

 

 

 

Coram:  McLachlin C.J. and Binnie and Charron JJ.

 

Coram : La juge en chef McLachlin et les juges Binnie et Charron

 

 

 

 

BETWEEN:

 

The Board of Trustees of the Edmonton Pipe Industry Pension Trust Fund

 

Applicant

 

‐ and ‐

 

Dennis Black Deans, Nelson Russling, Terence Day and James Sharp on their own behalf and on behalf of all beneficiaries of the Edmonton Pipe Industry Pension Plan, Bob Thachuk, Cliff Williams, Rob Kinsey, M.B. Strong, R. Garon, H. Cicconi, J. Curtis, J. Falvo, H. Morissette, R. Shirriffs, R. Auger, G. Dobson, N. Fredericksen, R. Dubord, W. Shaughnessy, P. Stalenhoef, G. Panas, H. Blakely and L. Matychuk

 

Respondents

 

 

 

ENTRE :

 

The Board of Trustees of the Edmonton Pipe Industry Pension Trust Fund

 

Demandeur

 

‐ et ‐

 

Dennis Black Deans, Nelson Russling, Terence Day and James Sharp on their own behalf and on behalf of all beneficiaries of the Edmonton Pipe Industry Pension Plan, Bob Thachuk, Cliff Williams, Rob Kinsey, M.B. Strong, R. Garon, H. Cicconi, J. Curtis, J. Falvo, H. Morissette, R. Shirriffs, R. Auger, G. Dobson, N. Fredericksen, R. Dubord, W. Shaughnessy, P. Stalenhoef, G. Panas, H. Blakely et L. Matychuk

 

Intimés

                                   

 

 

 


                         JUDGMENT

 

The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal of Alberta (Edmonton), Number  0403‐0156‐AC, 2005 ABCA 368, dated October 27, 2005, is dismissed with costs.

 

 

                          JUGEMENT

 

La demande dautorisation dappel de larrêt de la Cour dappel de lAlberta (Edmonton), numéro 0403‐0156‐AC, 2005 ABCA 368, daté du 27 octobre 2005, est rejetée avec dépens.

 

 

 

 


 

 

                                                                         C.J.C.


                                                                         J.C.C.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.