Applications for Leave

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                                                                                                                           No. 33483   

 

 

 


April 1, 2010

 

 

Le 1er avril 2010

 

 

 

Coram:  Binnie, Fish and Charron JJ.

 

 

Coram : Les juges Binnie, Fish et Charron

 

 

 

BETWEEN:

 

 

Golden Flight Travel Ltd. operating as Hurontario Centre

 

 

Applicant

 

 

‑ and ‑

 

 

Ministry of Consumer and Commercial Relations, as represented by the Ministry of Attorney General and James Girling

 

 

Respondents

 

 

ENTRE :

 

 

Golden Flight Travel Ltd. operating as Hurontario Centre

 

 

Demanderesse

 

 

‑ et ‑

 

 

Ministry of Consumer and Commercial Relations, as represented by the Ministry of Attorney General et James Girling

 

 

Intimés

                                   

 

 

 


 

                         JUDGMENT

 

The motions for an extension of time to serve and file the application for leave to appeal, for permission to allow Michael King to represent the corporate applicant and for an extension of time to serve and file a supplementary reply are granted.  The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Number C47805, 2009 ONCA 652, dated September 10, 2009, is dismissed with costs.

 

 

 

                          JUGEMENT

 

Les requêtes de la personne morale demanderesse en prorogation du délai de signification et de dépôt de la demande dautorisation dappel, pour être représentée par Michael King et en prorogation du délai de signification et de dépôt de la réplique supplémentaire sont accordées.  La demande dautorisation dappel de larrêt de la Cour dappel de lOntario, numéro C47805, 2009 ONCA 652,  daté du 10 septembre 2009, est rejetée avec dépens.

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

                                                                        J.S.C.C.

                                                                        J.C.S.C.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.