Applications for Leave

Decision Information

Decision Content

33520                                                                                                                                 No. 33520   

 


April 22, 2010

 

Le 22 avril 2010

 

 

 

Coram:  Binnie, Fish and Charron JJ.

 

Coram : Les juges Binnie, Fish et Charron

 

 

 


BETWEEN:

 

Attorney General of Canada

 

Applicant

 

‑ and ‑

 

Pritpal Singh Mavi, Maria Cristina Jatuff De Altamirano, Nedzad Dzihic, Rania El Murr, Oleg Grankin, Raymond Hince, Homa Vossoughi and Hamid Zebaradami

 

Respondents

 

AND BETWEEN:

 

Attorney General of Ontario

 

Applicant

 

‑ and ‑

 

Pritpal Singh Mavi, Maria Cristina Jatuff De Altamirano, Nedzad Dzihic, Rania El Murr, Oleg Grankin, Raymond Hince, Homa Vossoughi, Hamid Zebaradami and Attorney General of Canada

 

Respondents

 

 

ENTRE :

 

Procureur général du Canada

 

Demandeur

 

‑ et ‑

 

Pritpal Singh Mavi, Maria Cristina Jatuff De Altamirano, Nedzad Dzihic, Rania El Murr, Oleg Grankin, Raymond Hince, Homa Vossoughi et Hamid Zebaradami

 

Intimés

 

ET ENTRE :

 

Procureur général de lOntario

 

Demandeur

 

‑ et ‑

 

Pritpal Singh Mavi, Maria Cristina Jatuff De Altamirano, Nedzad Dzihic, Rania El Murr, Oleg Grankin, Raymond Hince, Homa Vossoughi, Hamid Zebaradami et Procureur général du Canada

 

Intimés

 

 

 

                                                JUDGMENT

 

The applications for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Number C49530, 2009 ONCA 794, dated November 12, 2009, are granted with costs in the cause.

 

 

                          JUGEMENT

 

Les demandes dautorisation dappel de larrêt de la Cour dappel de lOntario, numéro C49530, 2009 ONCA 794, daté du 12 novembre 2009, sont accordées avec dépens suivant lissue de la cause.

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

                                                                             

                                                                        J.S.C.C.

                                                                        J.C.S.C.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.