Applications for Leave

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                                                                                                                           No. 33439   

 

 

 


December 22, 2009

 

Le 22 décembre 2009

 

 

 

Coram:  LeBel, Deschamps and Cromwell JJ.

 

Coram : Les juges LeBel, Deschamps et Cromwell

 

 

 

 

BETWEEN:

 

Anette Sagen, Jenna Mohr, Lindsey Van, Jessica Jerome, Ulrike Grassler, Monika Planinc, Karla Keck, Nathalie De Leeuw, Katherine Willis by her Litigation Guardian Jan Willis, Jade Edwards, Zoya Lynch by her Litigation Guardian Sarah Lynch,, Charlotte Mitchell by her Litigation Guardian Miriam Mitchell and Meaghan Reid by her Litigation Guardian Nina Hooper‑Reid

 

Applicants

 

‑ and ‑

 

Vancouver Organizing Committee for the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games

 

Respondent

 

 

 

ENTRE :

 

Anette Sagen, Jenna Mohr, Lindsey Van, Jessica Jerome, Ulrike Grassler, Monika Planinc, Karla Keck, Nathalie De Leeuw, Katherine Willis by her Litigation Guardian Jan Willis, Jade Edwards, Zoya Lynch by her Litigation Guardian Sarah Lynch,, Charlotte Mitchell by her Litigation Guardian Miriam Mitchell et Meaghan Reid by her Litigation Guardian Nina Hooper‑Reid

 

Demanderesses

 

‑ et ‑

 

Vancouver Organizing Committee for the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games

 

Intimé

                                   

 

 

 

                         JUDGMENT

 

The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Vancouver), Number CA037306, 2009 BCCA 522, dated November 13, 2009, is dismissed with costs.

 

                          JUGEMENT

 

La demande dautorisation dappel de larrêt de la Cour dappel de la Colombie‑Britannique (Vancouver), numéro CA037306, 2009 BCCA 522, daté du 13 novembre 2009, est rejetée avec dépens.

 

 

 


 

 

                                                                             


                                                                        J.S.C.C.

                                                                        J.C.S.C.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.