Applications for Leave

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                                                                                                                           No. 31530   

 

 

 


November 9, 2006

 

Le 9 novembre 2006

 

 

 

Coram:  McLachlin C.J. and Charron and Rothstein JJ.

 

Coram : La juge en chef McLachlin et les juges Charron et Rothstein

 

 

 

 

BETWEEN:

 

Bernardus J. Speckling

 

Applicant

 

‑ and ‑

 

Local 76 of the Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada, Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada, Micheal Verdiel, Clark Banks, Al Bartley, John Belrose, Grant Campbell, John P. Campbell, Marvin Coe, Elvio Cramaro, Jerome Desilets, Al Fougere, Ron Gordey, George Orchiston, Joe Osmond, Harry Raimondo, Bill Spence, Ian Thompson, Dave Wainwright, Brad Wilson, Dave Coles, Brian Payne, Fred Pomeroy, and Others Yet Unknown

 

Respondents

 

 

 

ENTRE :

 

Bernardus J. Speckling

 

Demandeur

 

‑ et ‑

 

Local 76 of the Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada, Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada, Micheal Verdiel, Clark Banks, Al Bartley, John Belrose, Grant Campbell, John P. Campbell, Marvin Coe, Elvio Cramaro, Jerome Desilets, Al Fougere, Ron Gordey, George Orchiston, Joe Osmond, Harry Raimondo, Bill Spence, Ian Thompson, Dave Wainwright, Brad Wilson, Dave Coles, Brian Payne, Fred Pomeroy, and Others Yet Unknown

 

Intimés

                                   

 

 

 

                         JUDGMENT

 

The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Vancouver), Number CA032848, 2006 BCCA 203, dated April 27, 2006, is dismissed with costs.

 

 

                          JUGEMENT

 

La demande dautorisation dappel de larrêt de la Cour dappel de la Colombie‑Britannique (Vancouver), numéro CA032848, 2006 BCCA 203, daté du 27 avril 2006, est rejetée avec dépens.

 

 

 

 


 

 


                                                                         C.J.C.

                                                                         J.C.C.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.