Demandes d'autorisation

Informations sur la décision

Contenu de la décision

32580                                                                                                                                 No. 32580   

 

 


August 14, 2008

 

Le 14 août 2008

 

 

 

Coram:  Binnie, Abella and Rothstein JJ.

 

Coram : Les juges Binnie, Abella et Rothstein

 

 

 

 

BETWEEN:

 

Sentinel Hill No. 29 Limited Partnership, Sentinel Hill No. 30 Limited Partnership, Sentinel Hill No. 31 Limited Partnership, Sentinel Hill No. 116 Limited Partnership, Sentinel Hill No. 155 Limited Partnership, Sentinel Hill No. 178 Limited Partnership, Sentinel Hill No. 73 Limited Partnership, Sentinel Hill No. 77 Limited Partnership et al.

 

Applicants

 

‑ and ‑

 

Attorney General of Canada

 

Respondent

 

 

 

ENTRE :

 

Sentinel Hill No. 29 Limited Partnership, Sentinel Hill No. 30 Limited Partnership, Sentinel Hill No. 31 Limited Partnership, Sentinel Hill No. 116 Limited Partnership, Sentinel Hill No. 155 Limited Partnership, Sentinel Hill No. 178 Limited Partnership, Sentinel Hill No. 73 Limited Partnership, Sentinel Hill No. 77 Limited Partnership et al.

 

Demandeurs

 

‑ et ‑

 

Procureur général du Canada

 

Intimé

                                   

 

 

 

                         JUDGMENT

 

The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Number C47102, 2008 ONCA 132, dated February 22, 2008, is dismissed with costs.

 

 

                          JUGEMENT

 

La demande dautorisation dappel de larrêt de la Cour dappel de lOntario, numéro C47102, 2008 ONCA 132, daté du 22 février 2008, est rejetée avec dépens.

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

                                                                             

                                                                        J.S.C.C.

                                                                        J.C.S.C.

 Vous allez être redirigé vers la version la plus récente de la loi, qui peut ne pas être la version considérée au moment où le jugement a été rendu.