Bulletins

OF CANADA                                                        DU CANADA   

              BULLETIN  OF                                          BULLETIN DES

            PROCEEDINGS                                         PROCÉDURES

November 24, 1995                                    1840 - 1888 (INDEX)                                  le 24 novembre 1995

CONTENTS                                                                                       TABLE DES MATIÈRES

Applications for leave to appeal                              1840                      Demandes d'autorisation d'appel

filed                                                                                                  déposées

Applications for leave submitted                          1841 - 1845               Demandes soumises à la Cour depuis la

to Court since last issue                                                                     dernière parution

Oral hearing ordered                                                 -                         Audience ordonnée

Oral hearing on applications for                                 -                         Audience sur les demandes d'autorisation

leave                                                                                                

Judgments on applications for                                1846                      Jugements rendus sur les demandes

leave                                                                                                 d'autorisation

Motions                                                             1847 - 1849               Requêtes

Notices of appeal filed since last                            1850                      Avis d'appel déposés depuis la dernière

issue                                                                                                parution

Notices of intervention filed since                               -                         Avis d'intervention déposés depuis la

last issue                                                                                          dernière parution

Notices of discontinuance filed since                         -                         Avis de désistement déposés depuis la

last issue                                                                                          dernière parution

Appeals heard since last issue and                           -                         Appels entendus depuis la dernière

disposition                                                                                         parution et résultat

Pronouncements of appeals reserved                         -                         Jugements rendus sur les appels en

délibéré

Headnotes of recent judgments                                 -                         Sommaires des arrêts récents

Weekly agenda                                                     1851                      Ordre du jour de la semaine

Summaries of the cases                                     1852 - 1861               Résumés des affaires

Cumulative Index ‑ Leave                                    1862 - 1881               Index cumulatif ‑ Autorisations

Cumulative Index ‑ Appeals                                 1882 - 1885               Index cumulatif ‑ Appels

Appeals inscribed ‑ Session                                      -                         Appels inscrits ‑ Session

beginning                                                                                          commençant le

Notices to the Profession and                                   -                         Avis aux avocats et communiqué

Press Release                                                                                   de presse

Deadlines: Motions before the Court                       1886                      Délais: Requêtes devant la Cour

Deadlines: Appeals                                               1887                      Délais: Appels

Judgments reported in S.C.R.                                1888                      Jugements publiés au R.C.S.

Gurdial Singh Fiji

Gurdial Singh Fiji

v. (24923)

The Law Society of Upper Canada et al. (Ont.)

Julia E.A. West

FILING DATE  14.11.1995

G & W Electric Ltd.

André Simard

Guy & Gilbert

c. (24996)

Commission Hydro-Électrique du Québec (Hydro-Québec) (Qué.)

Richard Paquette

Marchand, Lemieux

DATE DE PRODUCTION  16.11.1995

United States of America et al.

Michael R. Dambrot, Q.C.

Dept. A.G. of Canada

v. (24997)

Arye Dynar (Ont.)

Frank Addario

Ruby & Edwardh

FILING DATE  7.11.1995

General Accident Assurance Co. of Canada

Barry R. Morrison, Q.C.

Clark, Drummie & Co.

v. (24998)

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. (N.B.)

Richard B. Costello, Q.C.

Barry & O'Neil

FILING DATE  17.11.1995

Paul Leeann Lewis et al.

John N. Laxton, Q.C.

Laxton & Co.

v. (24999)

Her Majesty The Queen in right of the province of British Columbia (B.C.)

William A. Pearce, Q.C.

Min. of the A.G.

FILING DATE  17.11.1995

Sunday Odutola Oduneye

R.S. Prithipaul

Gunn & Prithipaul

v. (25000)

Her Majesty The Queen (Alta.)

B. Rosborough

A.G. of Canada

FILING DATE  17.11.1995

Francis Eric Boyd Giles

Francis Eric Boyd Giles

v. (25002)

Marion Beatrice Giles (Alta.)

Robert V.T. Boyden

Soby Boyden Lenz

FILING DATE  17.11.1995

Blaiklock Inc.

Pierre Bourque, c.r.

Desjardins Ducharme Stein Monast

v. (25003)

Banque canadienne impériale de Commerce et al. (Qué.)

Mortimer Freiheit

Stikeman Elliott

DATE DE PRODUCTION  7.11.1995

                                                                                                                                               NOVEMBER 22, 1995 / LE 22 NOVEMBRE 1995

CORAM:  CHIEF JUSTICE LAMER AND GONTHIER AND IACOBUCCI JJ. /

LE JUGE EN CHEF LAMER ET LES JUGES GONTHIER ET IACOBUCCI

                                                           Rodney Tyler Fieldhouse

                                                                        v. (24785)

                                                        Her Majesty the Queen (Ont.)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Criminal law - Evidence - Trial - Cross-Examination - Whether Court of Appeal erred in allowing cross-examination on Applicant's diary during defence case rather than during Crown case - Whether Court of Appeal erred in allowing cross-examination on letters without first proving the truth of their contents.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

CORAM:  LA FOREST, CORY AND MAJOR JJ. /

LES JUGES LA FOREST, CORY ET MAJOR

                                                             Beloit Canada Ltée/Ltd.

                                                             and Beloit Corporation

                                                                        v. (24887)

                                                            Valmet Oy (F.C.A.)(Qué.)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Property law - Patents - Commercial law - Accounting - Infringement - Accounting of profits - Apportionment of profits - Whether an infringer must account for the profits from the sale of an entire machine or simply the profits relating to the sale of an integral, infringing part of the machine - Whether an infringer must account for the profits from the sale of spare parts and auxiliary equipment relating to the infringing parts of a machine - Whether potential use of hypothetical, non-infringing alternatives should be considered - Unjust enrichment.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Southam Inc., Lower Mainland Publishing Ltd., RIM Publishing Inc., Yellow Cedar Properties Ltd., North Shore Free Press Ltd., Specialty Publishers Inc.,

and Elty Publications Ltd.

                                                                        v. (24915)

                                   The Director of Investigation and Research (F.C.A.)(Ont.)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Administrative law - Competition law - Tribunals - Remedies - Mergers - Mergers by acquisition - Relevant product market - Curial deference - Competition Tribunal considering the proposed mergers of several newspapers - Divestiture of Southam's community newspapers and real estate publication sought by Respondent, on the ground that the joint control of these publications and the two daily newspapers reduces competition in newspaper retail advertising services and real estate advertising in various markets in the Vancouver area - Finding of substantial lessening of competition only in print real estate advertising market - Whether the question of market definition, a pivotal consideration in the merger review process of the Competition Act , R.S.C. 1985, c. C-34 , is a matter falling within the Tribunal's specialized expertise, such that appellate courts should treat the Tribunal's market definition decisions with deference - The proper approach for the Competition Tribunal to adopt with respect to the exercise of its remedial powers under section 92  of the Competition Act  given Parliament's shift of merger review from a criminal to a civil regime.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

CORAM:  L'HEUREUX-DUBÉ, SOPINKA AND McLACHLIN JJ. /

LES JUGES L'HEUREUX-DUBÉ, SOPINKA ET McLACHLIN

                                                                Sa Majesté la Reine

                                                                        c. (24867)

                                                         Pierre Patoine (Crim.)(Qué.)

NATURE DE LA CAUSE

Droit criminel - Procédure - Preuve - Nouvelle preuve - Diligence raisonnable - Témoignage d'un expert en projection de gouttes de sang - Application des al. 683(1) a) et b) du Code Criminel  - Application des arrêts Palmer c. La Reine, [1980] 1 R.C.S. 759, R. c. Stolar, [1988] 1 R.C.S. 480, et R. c. Price, [1993] 3 R.C.S. 633 - La nouvelle preuve satisfait-elle aux conditions fixées par la Cour suprême du Canada quant au critère de la diligence, quant au caractère décisif ou potentiellement décisif de la preuve et quant à son influence sur le résultat du procès?

HISTORIQUE PROCÉDURAL

                                           Ascenza Scamolla, Administratix of the Estate

                                         of Vincenzo Scamolla, deceased, Lou Scamolla,

                                       Antonetta Scamolla and Victoria Ashley Scamolla,

                                               by her litigation guardian, Lou Scamolla

                                                                        v. (24828)

                                             Tenax Limited, Alex Deliulis, Unicrane Inc.,

                                              Battista Damatto, Burrell Engineering Ltd.,

                                         Michael Burrell, Kroll Cranes A/S, ASX 9472 A/S,

                                           Kroll Giant Cranes A/S, Thomas Schmidt A/S,

                                            Bagsvaerd and Aktieselskabet Voelund (Ont.)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Torts - Negligence - Damages - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in reducing the amounts of non-pecuniary general damages awarded by the jury following the trial of an action for wrongful death - Whether there should be a cap on non-pecuniary damage awards made to claimants under wrongful death legislation?

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

CORAM:  CHIEF JUSTICE LAMER AND L'HEUREUX-DUBÉ AND GONTHIER JJ. /

LE JUGE EN CHEF LAMER ET LES JUGES L'HEUREUX-DUBÉ ET GONTHIER

                                                                       André Roy

                                                                        c. (24878)

                                                     Le Procureur général du Québec,

                                    La direction de la protection, ministère de l'agriculture,

                                          des pêcheries et de l'alimentation du Québec et

                          Le ministère du loisir, de la chasse et de la pêche du Québec (Qué.)

NATURE DE LA CAUSE

Responsabilité civile - Dommages-intérêts - Couronne - Pêches - Interdiction provisoire de la pêche commerciale au saumon - L'action en dommages-intérêts intentée par le demandeur contre les intimés a-t-elle un fondement juridique? - La Cour supérieure et la Cour d'appel ont-elles erré en concluant que le demandeur n'avait pas de droits acquis à l'exercice de la pêche commerciale, qu'il ne s'agissait pas ici d'un cas d'expropriation déguisée et qu'il n'avait pas été victime de discrimination? - Le Règlement de pêche du Québec, C.R.C. 1978, ch. 852, peut-il être appliqué de façon à anéantir le droit de pêche du demandeur?

HISTORIQUE PROCÉDURAL

NOVEMBER 23, 1995 / LE 23 NOVEMBRE 1995

24719               WESTCOAST ENERGY INC. v. HUSKY OIL OPERATIONS LTD., ET AL (Alta.)

CORAM:           L'Heureux-Dubé, Sopinka and McLachlin JJ.

The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.

La demande d'autorisation d'appel est rejetée avec dépens.

NATURE OF THE CASE

Administrative law - Procedural law - Appeal - Courts - Interest - Claim for interest - Whether or to what extent the doctrine of res judicata applies to decisions of administrative tribunals - Whether or to what extent courts can interfere with findings of fact or policy decisions by administrative tribunals on matters within their jurisdiction -  Whether the Court of Appeal failed to apply applicable standard of review - Natural Gas Pricing Agreement Act, R.S.A. 1980, c. N-4, Natural Gas Price Administration Act, R.S.A. 1980, c. N-3, Public Utilities Board Act, R.S.A. 1980, c. P-37.

16.11.1995

Before / Devant:  L'HEUREUX-DUBÉ J.

GRANTED / ACCORDÉE   Time extended to November 15, 1995.

16.11.1995

Before / Devant:  THE REGISTRAR

GRANTED / ACCORDÉE  Time extended to November 2, 1995.

16.11.1995

Before / Devant:  LA FOREST J.

IT IS ORDERED THAT THE STAY AND THE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL BE REFERRED TO A PANEL ON AN EXPEDITED BASIS / IL EST ORDONNÉ QUE LE SURSIS D'EXÉCUTION ET LA DEMANDE D'AUTORISATION DE POURVOI SOIENT SOUMIS PROMPTEMENT À UNE FORMATION DE JUGES

17.11.1995

Before / Devant:  L'HEUREUX-DUBÉ J.

GRANTED / ACCORDÉE 

20.11.1995

Before / Devant:  THE REGISTRAR

GRANTED / ACCORDÉE  Time extended to November 24, 1995.

20.11.1995

Before / Devant:  L'HEUREUX-DUBÉ

DISMISSED / REJETÉE 

21.11.1995

Before / Devant:  L'HEUREUX-DUBÉ J.

GRANTED / ACCORDÉE  Time extended to November 17, 1995.

AGENDA for the week beginning November 27, 1995.

ORDRE DU JOUR pour la semaine commençant le 27 novembre 1995.

Date of Hearing/                           Case Number and Name/    

Date d'audition                             Numéro et nom de la cause

27/11/95 TO/AU                           NTC Smokehouse Ltd. v. Her Majesty The Queen (B.C.) - AND BETWEEN

01/12/95                                      - Donald Gladstone et al. v. Her Majesty The Queen (B.C.) - AND BETWEEN - Allan Jacob Lewis v. Her Majesty The Queen and between Allan Frances Lewis v. Her Majesty The Queen and between Jacob Kenneth Lewis v. Her Majesty The Queen (B.C.) - AND BETWEEN - Dorothy Marie Van Der Peet v. Her Majesty The Queen (B.C.) - AND BETWEEN - Jerry Benjamin Nikal v. Her Majesty The Queen in right of Canada (B.C.)(23800, 23801, 23802, 23803, 23804)

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              NOTE: 

This agenda is subject to change.  Hearing dates should be confirmed with Process Registry staff at (613) 996-8666.

Cet ordre du jour est sujet à modification.  Les dates d'audience devraient être confirmées auprès du personnel du greffe au (613) 996-8666.

                                                                                                                                               23800                NTC SMOKEHOUSE LTD. V. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Indians - Constitutional - Fisheries - Whether native Indians have a right to sell fish which were legally caught under licence from their traditional, customary fishery - Whether sections 4(5) and 27(5) of the British Columbia Fishery (General) Regulations, SOR/84-248, as they read in September of 1986, of no force and effect with respect to the Appellant in the circumstances of these proceedings, in virtue of section 52  of the Constitution Act, 1982 , by reason of the aboriginal rights within the meaning of section 35  of the Constitution Act, 1982  invoked by the Appellant?

The Appellant, owner and operator of a food processing plant near Port Alberni, purchased approximately 119,435 pounds of Chinook salmon between September 7 and 23, 1986.  The fish were caught under the authority of Indian Food Fishing licences from the Somass River at the "Paper Mill Dam" site by 80 native Indians, 65 members of the Sheshaht Band and 15 members of the Opetchesaht Band.  The Indians, who have reserve lands adjacent to the Somass River which runs into Port Alberni Inlet, traditionally fished for salmon in the river, the taking of salmon being integral to the cultural and traditional way of life.  The Indians were issued Indian Food Fish licences, pursuant to regulations under the Fisheries Act, which permitted fishing during certain specified days and hours.

At trial the Respondent claimed that, although the fish were lawfully caught under the authority of an Indian Food Fish licence, the purchase and sale by the Appellant contravened ss. 4(5) and 27(5) of the B.C. Fishery (General) Regulations.  The Appellant claimed that the Paper Mill Dam site where the salmon were caught is part of the Reserve and the Sheshaht Band By-Law of March 9, 1982, SOR-82-471, authorizing the sale of fish, was applicable.  The Appellant also claimed that the sale of Indian Food fishery was an exercise of an aboriginal right.  The Appellant then claimed that the Regulations prohibiting the sale were ultra vires.

On August 19, 1988, the Appellant was convicted of one count of unlawfully buying fish, approximately 119,000 pounds of chinook salmon, that were not lawfully caught under the authority of a commercial fishing licence, and one count of selling fish, approximately 105,000 pounds of chinook salmon, between September 8 and October 24, 1986, caught under the authority of an Indian Food Fish Licence. 

The Appellant's summary conviction appeal was dismissed, and an appeal was taken to the British Columbia Court of Appeal.  The appeal was dismissed.

Origin of the case:                                                                                                            British Columbia

File No.:                                                                                                                                         23800

Judgment of the Court of Appeal:                                                                                           June 25, 1993

Counsel:                                                                                            David M. Rosenberg for the Appellant

                                                                   S. David Frankel, Q.C. and Cheryl J. Tobias for the Respondent

23800   NTC SMOKEHOUSE LTD. c. SA MAJESTÉ LA REINE

Indiens - Constitutionnel - Pêcheries - Les autochtones ont‑ils le droit de vendre du poisson qu'ils ont pris légalement aux termes d'un permis dans leur lieu de pêche coutumier et traditionnel? - Les paragraphes 4(5) et 27(5) du Règlement de pêche général de la Colombie‑Britannique, DORS/84‑248, tels qu'ils étaient libellés en septembre 1986, sont‑ils inopérants à l'égard de l'appelante dans les circonstances de l'espèce aux termes de l'art.   52  de la Loi constitutionnelle de 1982 , en raison des droits ancestraux invoqués par l'appelante, au sens où l'entend l'art.   35  de la Loi constitutionnelle de 1982 ?

L'appelante, propriétaire et exploitante d'une entreprise de transformation des aliments près de Port Alberni, a acheté approximativement 119 435 livres de saumon quinnat entre le 7 et le 23 septembre 1986.  Le poisson avait été pris aux termes d'un permis de pêche de subsistance des Indiens dans la rivière Somass au site du barrage de la papeterie par 80 autochtones, 65 membres de la bande Sheshaht et 15 membres de la bande Opetchesaht.  Les Indiens, qui ont des terres de réserve adjacentes à la rivière Somass qui se déverse dans l'anse de Port Alberni, ont traditionnellement pêché le saumon dans la rivière, la pêche au saumon faisant partie intégrante de leur mode de vie culturel et traditionnel.  Les permis de pêche de subsistance des Indiens délivrés aux Indiens conformément au règlement pris en vertu de la Loi sur les pêcheries autorisaient la pêche à des heures et à des jours déterminés.

Au procès, l'intimée a fait valoir que, bien que le poisson ait été pris légalement aux termes d'un permis de pêche de subsistance des Indiens, l'achat et la vente par l'appelante contrevenaient aux par. 4(5) et 27(5) du Règlement de pêche général de la Colombie‑Britannique.  L'appelante a soutenu que le site du barrage de la papeterie où le saumon a été pris fait partie de la réserve et que le règlement administratif pris par la bande Sheshaht le 9 mars 1982, DORS/82‑471, et autorisant la vente de poisson, s'applique.  L'appelante a également soutenu que la vente des fruits de la pêche de subsistance des Indiens était l'exercice d'un droit ancestral.  Elle a ensuite prétendu que le Règlement interdisant la vente était inconstitutionnel.

Le 19 août 1988, l'appelante a été déclarée coupable relativement à un chef d'accusation d'achat illégal de poisson, environ 119 000 livres de saumon quinnat, qui n'a pas été pris légalement aux termes d'un permis de pêche commerciale, et à un chef d'accusation de vente de poisson, approximativement 105 000 livres de saumon quinnat, entre le 8 et le 24 octobre 1986, pris aux termes d'un permis de pêche de subsistance des Indiens.

L'appel de l'appelante contre sa déclaration sommaire de culpabilité a été rejeté, et l'appel interjeté à la Cour d'appel de la Colombie‑Britannique a également été rejeté.

Origine :                                                            Colombie‑Britannique

N^o du greffe :                                                      23800

Arrêt de la Cour d'appel:                                      Le 25 juin 1993

Avocats :                                                           David M. Rosenberg pour l'appelante

S. David Frankel, c.r., et Cheryl J. Tobias pour l'intimée

23801   Donald and William Gladstone v. Her Majesty the Queen

Indians - Constitutional - Fisheries - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding that the Appellants do not have an aboriginal right to trade and sell herring spawn on kelp - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding that if there was a prima facie infringement of an aboriginal right to trade and sell herring spawn on kelp, the infringement was justified - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in supporting the conclusion of the trial judge that the Respondent proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the Appellants unlawfully attempted to sell a shipment of herring spawn on kelp.

The Appellants are members of the Heiltsuk Indian Band of Bella Coola which lives on the reserve at Waglisha on the east coast of Campbell Island, near Bella Bella.  The Appellants arranged to ship from Bella Bella to Vancouver approximately 4,200 pounds of herring spawn on kelp.  The herring spawn was in white plastic containers held in five crates which were said by the Appellants to contain personal belongings.  The fisheries officers, alerted by an informant, kept under surveillance the transportation of the crates from the freight carrier in Vancouver to a warehouse in Richmond where they determined that the crates contained herring spawn on kelp.  The Appellant William Gladstone picked up the crates and drove to a parking lot in Vancouver.  The Appellants then went to a retail fish store with one white container of herring spawn.  The Appellant William Gladstone asked the owner if he was "interested in herring on kelp" to which the owner replied he "never touched herring on kelp from native Indians".  The Appellants left and returned to the parking lot where they were arrested.  The Appellants had an Indian Food Fish Licence for 1988, which authorized the harvesting of not more than 500 pounds of herring spawn on kelp for food purposes.

The Appellants were charged with one count of unlawfully offering to sell herring spawn on kelp, caught under the authority of an Indian Food Fish Licence, contrary to s. 27(5) of the British Columbia Fishery (General) Regulations, and one count of unlawfully attempting to sell herring spawn on kelp other than herring spawn on kelp taken or collected under the authority of a Category J. Licence, contrary to s. 20(3) of the Pacific Herring Fishery Regulation.  The Appellants were convicted on both counts in the Provincial Court of British Columbia.  The Appellants' summary conviction appeal was allowed in part by the Supreme Court of British Columbia which allowed the appeal on the first count.  The Court of Appeal for British Columbia dismissed the Appellants' appeal, Lambert J.A. dissenting.

Origin of the case:                                                                                                            British Columbia

File No.:                                                                                                                                         23801

Judgment of the Court of Appeal:                                                                                           June 25, 1993

Counsel:                                                                               Marvin R.V. Storrow, Q.C., Naria A. Morellato,

                                                                                                            Joanne R. Lysyk, for the Appellant

                                                                                                S. David Frankel, Q.C., for the Respondent

23801   Donald et William Gladstone c. Sa Majesté la Reine

Indiens - Constitutionnel - Pêcheries - La Cour d'appel a‑t‑elle commis une erreur en concluant que les appelants n'avaient aucun droit ancestral de vendre des oeufs de hareng sur varech? - La Cour d'appel a‑t‑elle commis une erreur en concluant que, s'il y a eu violation à première vue d'un droit ancestral de vendre des oeufs de hareng sur varech, la violation était justifiée? - La Cour d'appel a‑t‑elle commis une erreur en se ralliant à la conclusion du juge du procès selon laquelle l'intimée a prouvé hors de tout doute raisonnable que les appelants ont tenté illégalement de vendre un chargement d'oeufs de hareng sur varech?

Les appelants font partie de la bande indienne des Heiltsuk de Bella Coola qui vit sur la réserve située à Waglisha sur la côte est de l'île Campbell, près de Bella Bella.  Les appelants ont pris des mesures pour expédier de Bella Bella à Vancouver environ 4 200 livres d'oeufs de hareng sur varech.  Les oeufs de hareng se trouvaient dans des contenants de plastique blanc placés dans cinq caisses qui, selon les appelants, étaient censées contenir des effets personnels.  Les agents des pêches, alertés par un informateur, ont surveillé le transport des caisses à partir de l'expéditeur de Vancouver jusqu'à un entrepôt de Richmond où ils établirent que les caisses contenaient des oeufs de hareng sur varech.  L'appelant William Gladstone est allé prendre les caisses et s'est dirigé vers un terrain de stationnement de Vancouver.  Les appelants se sont ensuite rendus chez un détaillant de poissons avec un contenant blanc d'oeufs de hareng sur varech.  L'appelant William Gladstone a demandé au propriétaire s'il était «intéressé à acheter du hareng sur varech», ce à quoi le propriétaire a répondu qu'il «ne touchait jamais au hareng sur varech qui venait des autochtones».  Les appelants sont partis et sont retournés au terrain de stationnement, où ils ont été arrêtés.  L'appelant avait un permis de pêche de subsistance des Indiens pour l'année 1988, qui autorisait le ramassage d'au plus 500 livres d'oeufs de hareng sur varech à des fins alimentaires.

Les appelants ont été accusés d'avoir offert illégalement de vendre des oeufs de hareng sur varech, ramassés en vertu d'un permis de pêche de subsistance des Indiens, en violation du par. 27(5) du Règlement général de pêche de la Colombie-Britannique et d'avoir tenté illégalement de vendre des oeufs de hareng sur varech autres que des oeufs de hareng sur varech pris ou ramassés en vertu du permis de catégorie J, en violation du par. 20(3) du Règlement de pêche du hareng du Pacifique.  Les appelants ont été reconnus coupables sous les deux chefs d'accusation devant la Cour provinciale de la Colombie-Britannique.  L'appel interjeté par les appelants contre leurs déclarations de culpabilité par procédure sommaire a été accueilli en partie par la Cour suprême de la Colombie-Britannique, qui a accueilli l'appel relativement au premier chef d'accusation.  La Cour d'appel de la Colombie-Britannique a rejeté l'appel des appelants, mais le juge Lambert était dissident.

Origine:                                                                                                                    Colombie-Britannique

N^o du greffe:                                                                                                                                    23801

Arrêt de la Cour d'appel:                                                                                                       le 25 juin 1993

Avocats:                                                                                 Marvin R.V. Storrow, c.r., Naria A. Morellato,

                                                                                                         Joanne R. Lysyk, pour les appelants

                                                                                                           S. David Frankel, c.r., pour l'intimée

23802   Lewis et al. v. Her Majesty the Queen

Indians - Constitutional - Fisheries - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding that the presumption ad medium filum aquae does not apply to the Squamish River where it runs adjacent to the boundaries of Cheakamus Indian Reserve No. 11 - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding that a fishery in the Squamish River adjacent to Cheakamus I.R. No. 11 was not reserved to the Squamish Indians and transferred to the federal Crown as part of Cheakamus I.R. No. 11 -Whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding that the Squamish Indian Band By-law No. 10 has no effect with respect to the regulation of fishing on the Squamish River adjacent to Cheakamus I.R. No. 11.

On October 6, 1986, the Appellants, members of the Squamish Band, engaged in net fishing on the Squamish River in an area immediately contiguous to the Cheakamus Indian Reserve No. 11.  The Appellants were charged with contravening the British Columbia Fishery (General) Regulations made pursuant to the Fisheries Act, R.S.C. 1970, c. F-14, on the ground that they were fishing at a time not authorized by an Indian Food Fish Licence and were fishing with a greater net length than that authorized by such a licence.  The Appellants claimed that they were authorized by the Squamish Indian Band By-law No. 10 to fish at the time and in the manner in question.  The Appellants were convicted on all counts in the Provincial Court of British Columbia.  The Appellants appealed their convictions to the County Court of British Columbia.  The County Court judge applied the presumption ad medium filum aquae, found that the boundary of the Cheakamus Indian Reserve extended to the mid-line of the Squamish River and concluded that the Squamish Indian Band By-law No. 10 constituted a complete defence where the fishing took place on the east, or reserve side, of the centre line of the Squamish River.  The appeals of the Appellants A.F. Lewis and A.J. Lewis were allowed since they had been fishing on the east, or reserve side, of the centre line of the river where their conduct was authorized by the Band By-law.  The appeal of the Appellant J.K. Lewis was dismissed because he had been fishing on the westerly side of the centre of the river.  The Court of Appeal for British Columbia allowed the Respondent's appeals against the acquittals of the Appellants A.F. Lewis and A.J. Lewis and dismissed the Appellant J.K. Lewis' appeal.

Origin of the case:                                                                                                            British Columbia

File No.:                                                                                                                                         23802

Judgment of the Court of Appeal:                                                                                           June 25, 1993

Counsel:                                                                       Harry A. Slade and John R. Rich, for the Appellants

                                                                                                S. David Frankel, Q.C., for the Respondent

23802   Lewis et autres c. Sa Majesté la Reine

Indiens - Constitutionnel - Pêcheries - La Cour d'appel a‑t‑elle commis une erreur en concluant que la présomption ad medium filum aquae ne s'applique pas à la rivière Squamish où elle jouxte les limites de la réserve indienne Cheakamus n^o 11? - La Cour d'appel a‑t‑elle commis une erreur en concluant qu'aucun droit de pêche dans la rivière Squamish où elle jouxte les limites de la réserve indienne Cheakamus n^o 11 n'était réservé aux Indiens squamish ni transféré à la Couronne fédérale comme partie intégrante de la réserve indienne Cheakamus n^o 11? - La Cour d'appel a‑t‑elle commis une erreur en concluant que le règlement n^o 10 de la bande indienne des Squamish est inopérant en ce qui concerne la réglementation de la pêche sur la rivière Squamish où elle jouxte les limites de la réserve indienne Cheakamus n^o 11?

Le 6 octobre 1986, les appelants, qui font partie de la bande des Squamish, ont entrepris de pêcher au filet sur la rivière Squamish dans une région immédiatement contiguë à la réserve indienne Cheakamus n^o 11.  Les appelants ont été accusés d'avoir contrevenu au Règlement général de pêche de la Colombie-Britannique pris conformément à la Loi sur les pêches, S.R.C. 1970, ch. F‑14, pour le motif qu'ils pêchaient à une époque de l'année qui n'était pas autorisée par un permis de pêche de subsistance des Indiens et qu'ils utilisaient un filet plus long que ne l'autorisait un tel permis.  Les appelants ont prétendu que le règlement n^o 10 de la bande indienne des Squamish les autorisait à pêcher à cette époque de l'année et de la manière en question.  Les appelants ont été reconnus coupables sous tous les chefs d'accusation en Cour provinciale de la Colombie-Britannique.  Ils ont interjeté appel de leurs déclarations de culpabilité devant la Cour de comté de la Colombie-Britannique.  Le juge de cette cour a appliqué la présomption ad medium filum aquae, estimé que les limites de la réserve indienne Cheakamus s'étendaient jusqu'à la ligne médiane de la rivière Squamish et conclu que le règlement n^o 10 de la bande indienne des Squamish constituait une défense pleine et entière si la pêche avait lieu du côté est, ou du côté de la réserve, de la ligne médiane de la rivière Squamish.  Les appels interjetés par les appelants A.F. Lewis et A.J. Lewis ont été accueillis parce qu'ils pêchaient du côté est, ou du côté de la réserve, de la ligne médiane de la rivière, où leur activité était autorisée par le règlement de la bande indienne.  L'appel de l'appelant J.K. Lewis a été rejeté parce qu'il pêchait du côté ouest du milieu de la rivière.  La Cour d'appel de la Colombie-Britannique a accueilli les appels interjetés par l'intimée contre l'acquittement des appelants A.F. Lewis et A.J. Lewis et a rejeté l'appel interjeté par l'appelant J.K. Lewis.

Origine:                                                                                                                    Colombie-Britannique

N^o du greffe:                                                                                                                                    23802

Arrêt de la Cour d'appel:                                                                                                       le 25 juin 1993

Avocats:                                                                         Harry A. Slade et John R. Rich, pour les appelants

                                                                                                           S. David Frankel, c.r., pour l'intimée

23803               DOROTHY MARIE VAN DER PEET v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Indians - Constitutional - Fisheries - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in determining that the present day aboriginal right to sell fish is dependent upon proof of an aboriginal practice of fishing for a commercial market prior to contact with Europeans - Whether section 27(5) of the British Columbia Fishery (General) Regulations, SOR/84-248, as it read on September 11, 1987, is of no force and effect with respect to the Appellant in the circumstances of these proceedings, in virtue of section 52  of the Constitution Act, 1982 , by reasons of the aboriginal rights within the meaning of section 35  of the Constitution Act, 1982 , invoked by the Appellant? 

Scarlett P.C.J. of the Provincial Court of British Columbia convicted the Appellant, a member of the Sto:lo Indian Band, of unlawfully selling fish, 10 salmon, caught under an Indian Food Fish Licence in contravention of s. 27(5) of the British Columbia Fishery (General) Regulations.  The fish were lawfully caught by members of the Appellant's Band and delivered to the Appellant who sold some of them to a third party.  The Appellant claimed that her aboriginal right included the right to sell the fish, that this right had not been extinguished, and that legislation infringing the right was invalid.  The Appellant's summary conviction appeal was allowed by Selbie J. of the Supreme Court of British Columbia who concluded that the aboriginal right to fish included the right to barter or sell.  The Court of Appeal for British Columbia allowed the Respondent's appeal, Lambert and Hutcheon JJ.A. dissenting.

Origin of the case:                                                                                                            British Columbia

File No.:                                                                                                                                         23803

Judgment of the Court of Appeal:                                                                                           June 25, 1993

Counsel:                                                                      Louise Mandell and Leslie J. Pinder for the Appellant

                                                                   S. David Frankel, Q.C. and Cheryl J. Tobias for the Respondent

23803   DOROTHY MARIE VAN DER PEET c. SA MAJESTÉ LA REINE

Indiens - Constitutionnel - Pêcheries - La Cour d'appel a‑t‑elle commis une erreur en concluant que le droit ancestral de vendre du poisson aujourd'hui repose sur la preuve d'une pratique ancestrale de pêcher pour un marché commercial antérieure au contact avec les Européens? - Le paragraphe 27(5) du Règlement de pêche général de la Colombie-Britannique, DORS/84‑248, tel qu'il était libellé le 11 septembre 1987, est‑il inopérant à l'égard de l'appelante dans les circonstances de l'espèce aux termes de l'art.   52  de la Loi constitutionnelle de 1982 , en raison des droits ancestraux, invoqués par l'appelante, au sens où l'entend l'art.   35  de la Loi constitutionnelle de 1982 ?

Le juge Scarlett de la Cour provinciale de la Colombie‑Britannique a déclaré l'appelante, un membre de la bande indienne Sto:lo, coupable d'avoir vendu illégalement du poisson, 10 saumons pris en vertu d'un permis de pêche de subsistance des Indiens, en contravention du par. 27(5) du Règlement de pêche général de la Colombie‑Britannique.  Les poissons ont été pris légalement par les membres de la bande de l'appelante et livrés à cette dernière qui en a vendu une partie à un tiers.  L'appelante a fait valoir que son droit ancestral incluait celui de vendre le poisson, que ce droit n'avait pas été éteint, et que la législation portant atteinte au droit était invalide.  L'appel de l'appelante contre sa déclaration sommaire de culpabilité a été accueilli par le juge Selbie de la Cour suprême de la Colombie‑Britannique, qui a conclu que le droit ancestral de pêcher incluait celui d'échanger ou de vendre.  La Cour d'appel de la Colombie‑Britannique a accueilli l'appel de l'intimée, les juges Lambert et Hutcheon étant dissidents.

Origine :                                                            Colombie‑Britannique

N^o du greffe :                                                      23803

Arrêt de la Cour d'appel :                         Le 25 juin 1993

Avocats :                                                           Louise Mandell et Leslie J. Pinder pour l'appelante

S. David Frankel, c.r., et Cheryl J. Tobias pour l'intimée

23804   JERRY BENJAMIN NIKAL V. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA

Indians - Constitutional - Fisheries - Whether section 4(1) of the B.C. Fishery (General) Regulations, SOR/84-248, as it read in July of 1986, and licences issued thereunder, of no force and effect with respect to the Appellant in the circumstances of these proceedings, by virtue of section 52  of the Constitution Act, 1982 , by reasons of the aboriginal rights within the meaning of section 35  of the Constitution Act, 1982 , invoked by the Appellant?

On July 20 and 23, 1986, officers of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans watched the Appellant, a member of the Gitksan-Wet'suwet'en people, gaff salmon in the waters of the Bulkley River at Moricetown, the village of Moricetown being adjacent to the Bulkley River and included within the boundaries of Moricetown Reserve No. 1.  The Appellant was charged with fishing without a licence contrary to s. 4(1) of the British Columbia Fishery (General) Regulations.  The Appellant claimed that he was governed by the Gitksan-Wet'suwet'en Indian Fishing By-law made pursuant to s. 81(1)(o) of the Indian Act, R.S.C. 1970, c. I-6.  Smyth P.C.J. of the Provincial Court of British Columbia acquitted the Appellant.  Millward J. of the Supreme Court of British Columbia dismissed the Respondent's appeal.  The Court of Appeal for British Columbia allowed the Respondent's appeal, Lambert and Hutcheon JJ.A. dissenting.

Origin of the case:                                                                                                            British Columbia

File No.:                                                                                                                                         23804

Judgment of the Court of Appeal:                                                                                           June 25, 1993

Counsel:                                                                       Peter R. Grant and David Paterson for the Appellant

                                                                                                 S. David Frankel, Q.C. for the Respondent

23804   JERRY BENJAMIN NIKAL c. SA MAJESTÉ LA REINE DU CHEF DU CANADA

Indiens - Constitutionnel - Pêcheries - Le paragraphe 4(1) du Règlement de pêche général de la Colombie-Britannique, DORS/84‑248, tel qu'il était libellé en juillet 1986, et les permis délivrés conformément à ce règlement, sont‑ils inopérants à l'égard de l'appelant dans les circonstances de l'espèce aux termes de l'art.   52  de la Loi constitutionnelle de 1982 , en raison des droits ancestraux, invoqués par l'appelant, au sens où l'entend l'art.   35  de la Loi constitutionnelle de 1982 ?

Les 20 et 23 juillet 1986, des représentants du ministère des Pêches et des Océans ont vu l'appelant, un membre du peuple des Gitksan‑Wet'suwet'en, gaffer le saumon dans les eaux de la rivière Bulkley à Moricetown, le village de Moricetown étant adjacent à la rivière Bulkley et se trouvant dans les limites de la réserve n^o 1 de Moricetown.  L'appelant a été accusé d'avoir pêché sans permis, contrairement au par. 4(1) du Règlement de pêche général de la Colombie‑Britannique.  Il a fait valoir qu'il était régi par le règlement de pêche des Indiens pris par les Gitksan‑Wet'suwet'en en vertu de l'al. 81(1)o) de la Loi sur les Indiens S.R.C 1970, ch. I‑6.  Le juge Smyth de la Cour provinciale de la Colombie‑Britannique a acquitté l'appelant.  Le juge Millward de la Cour suprême de la Colombie‑Britannique a rejeté l'appel de l'intimée, dont l'appel a été accueilli par la Cour d'appel de la Colombie‑Britannique, les juges Lambert et Hutcheon étant dissidents.

Origine :                                                            Colombie‑Britannique

N^o du greffe :                                                      23804

Arrêt de la Cour d'appel :                         Le 25 juin 1993

Avocats :                                                           Peter R. Grant et David Paterson pour l'appelant

S. David Frankel, c.r., pour l'intimée

This index includes applications for leave to appeal standing for judgment at the beginning of 1995 and all the applications for leave to appeal filed or heard in 1995 up to now.

Cet index comprend les requêtes en autorisation de pourvoi en délibéré au début de 1995 et toutes celles produites ou entendues en 1995 jusqu'à maintenant.

*01   Refused/Refusée

*02   Refused with costs/Refusée avec dépens

*03   Granted/Accordée

*04   Granted with costs/Accordée avec dépens

*05   Discontinuance filed/Désistement produit

*A     Applications for leave to appeal filed/Requêtes en autorisation de pourvoi produites

*B     Submitted to the Court/Soumises à la Cour

*C     Oral Hearing/Audience

*D     Reserved/En délibéré

                                                                                                 Status/                                 Disposition/

 CASE/AFFAIRE                                                                         Statut                   Résultat

                                                                                                                Page

69971 Manitoba Ltd. v. National Bank of Canada (Man.), 24744, *02

   28.9.95                                                                                                    1215(95)                   1398(95)

771225 Ontario Inc. v. Bramco Holdings Co. (Ont.), 24649, *02

   2.11.95                                                                                                    1104(95)                   1721(95)

A.M. v. Ryan (B.C.), 24612, *03 19.10.95                                                       824(95)                    1588(95)

Accurpress Manufacturing Ltd. v. Stoddard (B.C.), 23882, *A                          2282(93)

Adler (Ralph) v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 24341, *01 26.1.95                         1770(94)                   133(95)

Adler (Susie) v. The Queen (Ont.), 24347, *03 2.2.95                                      1844(94)                   248(95)

Affeldt v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24429, *01 2.3.95                                     122(95)                    466(95)

Air Canada v. Liquor Control Board of Ontario (Ont.),

   24851, *A                                                                                                 1336(95)

Alberta Union of Provincial Employees v. The Queen in right

   of Alberta (Alta.), 24794, *B                                                                       1560(95)

Alcorn v. Solomon (Ont.), 24920, *A                                                              1582(95)

Alepin c. Alepin (Qué.), 24795, *01 21.9.95                                                    1306(95)                   1389(95)

Allam c. Nessia Investments Ltd. (Qué.), 23168, *A                                        2048(92)

Allard c. Commission des valeurs mobilières du Québec (Qué.), 24483, *02

   16.3.95                                                                                                    455(95)                    551(95)

Allen v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24595, *01 1.6.95                                        661(95)                    1000(95)

Alta Surety Co. v. Arnoldin Construction and Forms Ltd. (N.S.),

   24644, *02 14.9.95                                                                                    995(95)                    1358(95)

Ambrose v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24530, *01 4.5.95                                  450(95)                    774(95)

American Home Assurance Co. v. Brkich & Brkich Enterprises Ltd.

   (B.C.), 24959, *A                                                                                      1714(95)

Antoniuk v. Western Heritable Investment Co. of Canada Ltd.

   (Alta.), 24687, *02 17.8.95                                                                         1190(95)                   1314(95)

Apotex Inc. v. Merck & Co. Inc. (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 24562, *05 27.2.95                  328(95)                    475(95)

Apotex Inc. v. Merck & Co. Inc. (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 24751, *B                               1341(95)

Apotex Inc. v. Wellcome Foundation Ltd. (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 24646, *02

   28.9.95                                                                                                    997(95)                    1403(95)

Arica v. Minister of Employment and Immigration (F.C.A.)(Ont.),

   24852, *02 16.11.95                                                                                  1716(95)                   1793(95)

Armada Lines Ltd. v. Chaleur Fertilizers Ltd. (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 24351, *03

   29.6.95                                                                                                    29(95)                      1225(95)

Ash v. Ash (B.C.), 24516, *02 9.11.95                                                           1524(95)                   1766(95)

Associated Respiratory Services Inc. v. Purchasing Commission (B.C.),

   24366, *02 22.6.95                                                                                    25(95)                      1114(95)

Association des policiers provinciaux du Québec c. Sûreté du Québec

   (Qué.), 24627 *02 6.7.95                                                                            843(95)                    1230(95)

Athey v. Leonati (B.C.), 24725, *03 9.11.95                                                    1216(95)                   1768(95)

Atlantic Communication and Technical Workers' Union v. Maritime

   Telegraph and Telephone Co. (N.S.), 24506, *02 22.6.95                              534(95)                    1115(95)

Atlific (Nfld.) Ltd. v. Hotel Buildings Ltd. (Nfld.), 24313, *02

   26.1.95                                                                                                    1682(94)                   132(95)

Attorney General for New Brunswick v. Morgentaler (N.B.), 24623, *02

   17.8.95                                                                                                    843(95)                    1311(95)

Attorney General of British Columbia v. Zutter (B.C.), 24742, *A                      1188(95)

Attorney General of Canada v. Jenkins (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 24797, *02

   9.11.95                                                                                                    1381(95)                   1763(95)

Attorney Genaeral of Canada v. Royal Canadian Mounted Police

   Public Complaints Commission (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 24319, *02 2.2.95                 1844(94)                   247(95)

Audet c. La Reine (Crim.)(N.B.), 24653, *B                                                    1558(95)

Audet c. La Reine (Crim.)(N.B.), 24653, the application for leave to cross-

   appeal is dismissed 26.10.95                                                                     1558(95)                   1659(95)

Augustus c. Montreal Urban Community (Qué.), 24607, *03 29.6.95                 825(95)                    1223(95)

Austin v. The Queen (Alta.), 24832, *B                                                          1523(95)

Azzolini v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 24718, *01 21.9.95                                 1199(95)                   1392(95)

B.C. Bancorp (formerly Bank of British Columbia) v. Hockin (B.C.),

   24754, *02 28.9.95                                                                                    1305(95)                   1399(95)

B.K. v. The Queen (Crim.)(Sask.), 24357, *03 2.2.95                                      1959(94)                   256(95)

Bachman v. Garden (Sask.), 24544, *02 30.3.95                                            542(95)                    611(95)

Baker Energy Resources Corporation v. Reading & Bates

   Construction Co. (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 24458, *02 1.6.95                                      333(95)                    1003(95)

Bank of Montreal c. The Queen (Crim.)(F.C.A.)(Qué.),

   24956, *A                                                                                                 1713(95)

Baroni v. The Queen (N.S.), 23439, *A                                                          478(93)

Baroud v. Minister of Citizenship and Immigration (Ont.), 24610, *01

   15.6.95                                                                                                    823(95)                    1087(95)

Barrons v. Hyundai Auto Canada Inc. (Ont.), 24833, *B                                   1788(95)

Barrons v. The Queen in right of Canada (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 24717, *01

   7.9.95  1198(95)                                                                                       1349(95)

Barry v. Bezanson (N.S.), 24940, *A                                                              1712(95)

Barrys Ltd. v. Fishermen, Food and Allied Workers' Uniion (Nfld.),

   24897, *A                                                                                                 1522(95)

Barrys Ltd. v. Fishermen, Food and Allied Workers' Uniion (Nfld.),

   24972, *A                                                                                                 1754(95)

Barsalou v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 24498, *01 27.4.95                                371(95)                    743(95)

Barzelex Inc. c. Banque de Nouvelle-Écosse (Qué.), 24577, *02 1.6.95            674(95)                    1001(95)

Barzelex Inc. c. Geestemünder Bank AG (Qué.), 24576, *02 1.6.95                 673(95)                    1001(95)

Basra v. Gill (B.C.), 24450, *02 27.4.95                                                         293(95)                    743(95)

Bate Equipment Ltd. v. Ellis-Don Ltd. (Alta.), 24396, *02 18.5.95                     31(95)                      850(95)

Battlefords and District Co-operative Ltd. v. Gibbs

   (Sask.), 24342, *03 2.2.95                                                                         1775(94)                   247(95)

Beals v. The Queen (Crim.)(N.S.), 24519, *01 27.4.95                                     577(95)                    742(95)

Beaupré c. La Reine (Crim.)(Qué.), 24829, *01 19.10.95                                  1523(95)                   1587(95)

Beckei v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 24657, *01 14.9.95                                  996(95)                    1360(95)

Beloit Canada Ltée/Ltd. c. Oy (C.A.F.)(Qué.), 24887, *B                                  1841(95)

Bennett v. Kynock (N.S.), 24299, *01 2.2.95                                                  1627(94)                   245(95)

Bernier c. La Reine (Qué.), 24912, *A                                                            1581(95)

Bérubé c. Procureur général du Québec (Qué.), 24603, *02 15.6.95                  770(95)                    1085(95)

Bilinski c. Léon (Qué.), 24696, *02 21.9.95                                                     1211(95)                   1387(95)

Biscette v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 24787, *B                                              1560(95)

Bissonnette c. La Reine (Crim.)(Qué.), 24720, *01 17.8.95                              1102(95)                   1313(95)

Bjorge v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 24976, *A                                                1754(95)

Black v. Ernst & Young Inc. (N.S.), 24792, *A                                               1188(95)

Blaiklock Inc. c. Banque canadienne impériale de Commerce

   (Qué.), 25003, *A                                                                                      1840(95)

Blanchard v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(Alta.), 24942, *A                                         1712(95)

Blenkin v. Regina District Health Board (Sask.), 24599, *02

   28.9.95                                                                                                    672(95)                    1402(95)

Blue v. Ontario Hydro (Ont.), 24393, *02 17.8.95                                             299(95)                    1311(95)

Bluebird Footwear Inc. c. General Motors Acceptance Corporation

   of Canada (Qué.), 24386, *A                                                                      1764(94)

Board of Education for the City of Toronto v. Ontario Secondary

   School Teachers' Federation, District 15 (Toronto) (Ont.),

   24724, *03 11.10.95                                                                                  1214(95)                   1566(95)

Bober v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24455, *01 18.5.95                                    118(95)                    847(95)

Boma Manufacturing Ltd. v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce

   (B.C.), 24520, *03 1.6.95                                                                           546(95)                    1007(95)

Bossé v. Mastercraft Group Inc. (Ont.), 24702, *02 21.9.95                             1081(95)                   1393(95)

Bouchard c. La Reine (Crim.)(Qué.), 24512, *01 6.4.95                                    449(95)                    676(95)

Bourbonnière c. Bureau d'expertise des assureurs Ltée

   (Qué.), 24452, *02 2.3.95                                                                           241(95)                    461(95)

Bouvillons Canada Ltée c. Labbé (Qué.), 24550, *02 6.4.95                             547(95)                    677(95)

Brant County Board of Education v. Eaton (Ont.), 24668, *03

   26.10.95                                                                                                  910(95)                    1663(95)

Brault c. Fontaine (Qué.), 23953, *A                                                              196(94)

British Columbia Rugby Union v. Hamstra (B.C.), 24743, *A                            988(95)

Broderick v. The Queen (P.E.I.), 24733, *05 5.7.95                                         1243(95)                   1243(95)

Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers c. Picher (Qué.), 24541, *02

   11.5.95                                                                                                    577(95)                    829(95)

Brousseau c. Stewart-Wolf (Qué.), 24407, *02 26.1.95                                    19(95)                      129(95)

Brown (Edmond) v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24892, *A                                  1521(95)

Brown (Elvin Kyle) v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24594, *01 1.6.95                     656(95)                    999(95)

Burden v. Scurry-Rainbow Oil Ltd. (Alta.), 24405, *02 30.3.95                          18(95)                      615(95)

C.A.D. Ringrose Therapy Institute Ltd. v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(Alta.),

   24673, *02 21.9.95                                                                                    1079(95)                   1392(95)

C.N. Weber Ltd. v. Dooley (Ont.), 24693, *01 19.10.95                                    1210(95)                   1589(95)

Callahan v. Courtnage (Ont.), 24916, *A                                                         1581(95)

Camani v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24369, *01 16.2.95                                  9(95)                        339(95)

Canadian Association of Fire Bomber Pilots v. Government of

   Saskatchewan (Sask.), 24214, *02 2.2.95                                                   1313(94)                   254(95)

Canadian Broadcasting Corporation v. Attorney General for New

   Brunswick (Crim.)(N.B.), 24305, *03 30.3.95                                               1847(94)                   613(95)

Canadian Broadcasting Corporation v. Attorney General of the

   province of Saskatchewan (Sask.), 23738, *02 12.1.95                                1797(93)                   34(95)

Canadian Broadcasting Corporation v. Bank of British Columbia

   (B.C.), 24934, *A                                                                                      1653(95)

Canadian Broadcasting Corporation v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24579,

   *01 4.5.95                                                                                                576(95)                    773(95)

Canadian Lawyers Insurance Association v. The Queen in right of

   Alberta (Alta.), 24925, *A                                                                          1652(95)

Canadian National Railway Co. v. Burlington Northern Railroad Co.

  (B.C.), 24857, *A                                                                                       1337(95)

Canadian National Railway Co. v. National Transportation Agency

   (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 24919, *A                                                                           1712(95)

Canadian National Railway Co. v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 24340, *02

   26.1.95                                                                                                    1771(94)                   133(95)

Canadian Pacific Ltd. v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees

   Canadian Pacific System Federation (B.C.), 24317, *03 20.7.95                   1683(94)                   1231(95)

Canadian Pacific Ltd. v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(B.C.), 24315, *02 26.1.95            1771(94)                   133(95)

Canderel Ltd. v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 24663, *02 17.8.95                        1077(95)                   1313(95)

Candy v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 24902, *A                                                 1557(95)

Canson Enterprises Ltd. v. Boughton & Co. (B.C.), 24991, *A                          1784(95)

Casselman v. Serban (B.C.), 24613, *02 26.10.95                                          825(95)                    1662(95)

Castor Holdings Ltd. c. Elliott (Qué.), 24910, *A                                             1580(95)

Catholic Children's Aid society of Metropolitan Toronto v. Volker (Ont.),

   24961, *A                                                                                                 1714(95)

Centre communautaire juridique de l'Estrie c. Ville de

   Sherbrooke (Qué.), 24425, *03 2.3.95                                                         243(95)                    460(95)

Chaba v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 24380, *01 19.1.95                                   1849(94)                   42(95)

Chabotar c. La Reine (Crim.)(Qué.), 24563, *01 18.5.95                                  581(95)                    855(95)

Chalkley v. Chalkley (Man.), 24515, *01 L'Heureux-Dubé J. dissenting

   30.3.95                                                                                                    501(95)                    618(95)

Chan v. Cheung (Alta.), 24527, *02 28.9.95                                                    533(95)                    1396(95)

Charlebois (Gilles) v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 279 (F.C.A.)(Ont.),

   24219, *02 12.1.95                                                                                    1323(94)                   37(95)

Charlebois (Sylvain) c. Collège militaire royal de Saint-Jean (Qué.),

   24656, *02 31.08.95                                                                                  1194(95)                   1347(95)

Chavali v. Ng (Ont.), 24461, *02 16.3.95                                                        294(95)                    552(95)

Cheticamp Fish Co-Operative Ltd. v. The Queen in right of Canada

   (N.S.), 24700, *02 11.10.95                                                                       1199(95)                   1569(95)

Chetty v. Burlingham Associates Inc. (Sask.), 24590, *02 14.9.95                   666(95)                    1354(95)

Choudhury c. Bernier (Qué.), 24747, *02 21.9.95                                             1298(95)                   1387(95)

Chouinard c. Procureur général du Canada (Qué.), 24664, *02 29.6.95              1108(95)                   1221(95)

City of Dartmouth v. Pay Equity Commissiion (N.S.), 24447, *02

   30.3.95                                                                                                    234(95)                    612(95)

City of Prince George v. A.L. Sims & Sons Ltd. (B.C.),

   24966, *A                                                                                                 1754(95)

Clair v. The Queen (N.S.), 24951, *A                                                             1713(95)

Clark v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24635, *02 6.7.95                                       989(95)                    1227(95)

Clark v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 24676, *02 6.7.95                                     993(95)                    1227(95)

Clarke v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24583, *01 28.9.95                                    581(95)                    1400(95)

Cloutier c. Ferland (Qué.), 24349, *02 26.1.95                                                1846(94)                   131(95)

Club juridique c. Dufour (Qué.), 24937, *A                                                      1653(95)

Codina v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24597, *01 28.9.95                                   672(95)                    1401(95)

College of Physicians and Surgeons of New Brunswick v. Kenney

   (N.B.), 24488, *02 18.5.95                                                                         297(95)                    850(95)

Collier v. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia (B.C.), 24560,

   *01 26.10.95                                                                                             659(95)                    1661(95)

Comeau's Sea Foods Ltd. v. The Queen in right of Canada

   (F.C.A.)(Crim.)(Ont.), 24682, *03 9.11.95                                                    1105(95)                   1764(95)

Commission des droits de la personne du Québec c. Commission

   scolaire régionale Chauveau (Qué.), 24291, *02 2.2.95                                 1561(94)                   254(95)

Commission scolaire de la Jonquière c. Syndicat du personnel

   de soutien de Jonquière (Qué.), 24338, *02 26.1.95                                      1767(94)                   128(95)

Commission scolaire Les Écores c. Syndicat de l'enseignement de

   la région des Mille-Îles (Qué.), 24456, *02 9.3.95                                          336(95)                    502(95)

Commission scolaire Jérôme Le Royer c. Syndicat des enseignantes

   et des enseignants de Le Royer (Qué.), 24620, *03 20.7.95                          769(95)                    1232(95)

Commonwealth Investors Syndicate Ltd. v. Laxton (B.C.),

   24353, *02 30.3.95                                                                                    124(95)                    616(95)

Compagnie de la Baie d'Hudson c. Désjardins-Ferland (Qué.), 24482, *02

   9.3.95  377(95)                                                                                         504(95)

Compagnie Montréal Trust c. Gestion d'investissements Jadeau Inc. (Qué.),

   24843, *02 2.11.95                                                                                    1562(95)                   1721(95)

Construction Acibec (1980) Ltée c. Résidence Marro Inc. (Qué.),

   24575, *02 27.4.95                                                                                    584(95)                    742(95)

Construction Amtron Inc. c. Corbeil (Qué.), 22562, *A                                     1783(91)

Coopers & Lybrand Ltd. v. Bruncor Leasing Inc. (N.S.),

   24279, *02 19.1.95                                                                                    1511(94)                   40(95)

Coopers & Lybrand Ltd. v. The Queen in right of Canada (F.C.A.)(N.S.),

   24329, *02 26.1.95                                                                                    1955(94)                   130(95)

Corporation d'assurance de personne La Laurentienne c. Ville de Québec

   (Qué.), 24703, *02 7.9.95                                                                           1204(95)                   1350(95)

Corporation municipale de la ville de Bécancour c. Enfoui-Bec Inc.

   (Qué.), 24422, *02 16.3.95                                                                         127(95)                    550(95)

Corporation of the City of Mississauga v. The Queen in right of

   Ontario (Ont.), 24774, *B                                                                           1719(95)

Corporation of the City of York v. Superior Propane Inc. (Ont.),

   24793, *B                                                                                                 1757(95)

Country Music Television Inc. v. Canadian Radio-Television and

   Telecommunications Commission (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 24477, leave to

   appeal dismissed with costs to the respondent MH Radio/Rawlco

   Partnership 26.1.95                                                                                   32(95)                      130(95)

County of Strathcona No. 20 v. Alberta Assessment Appeal Board (Alta.),

   24780, *05 7.9.95                                                                                     1101(95)                   1373(95)

Courtcliffe Parks Ltd. v. Hamilton Wentworth Credit Union (Ont.),

   24106, *02 2.2.95                                                                                     1857(94)                   251(95)

Couture (Jacynthe) c. Gagnon (Qué.), 24491, *02 16.3.95                                456(95)                    551(95)

Couture (Richard) c. La Reine (Crim.)(Qué.), 24392, *01 26.1.95                      1960(94)                   135(95)

Couture (Richard) c. La Reine (Crim.)(Qué.), 24505, *05 11.5.95                      832(95)                    832(95)

Crews v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 24521, *01 18.5.95                                    453(95)                    852(95)

Cross v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24371, *01 9.3.95                                      11(95)                      504(95)

Crossley v. The Queen (Crim.)(N.S.), 24726, *01 28.9.95                                1206(95)                   1394(95)

Crown Parking Co. v. City of Calgary (Alta.), 24377, *02 2.3.95                        1850(94)                   464(95)

Cuenca c. Procureur général du Canada (Qué.), 24909, *A                               1580(95)

D & B Companies of Canada Ltd. v. Director of Investigation

   and Research (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 24423, *02 23.2.95                                         1957(94)                   385(95)

D.G.R. v. K.L.V. (B.C.), 24365, *05 26.5.95                                                   1859(94)                   1013(95)

D.M. v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24462, *01 23.3.95                                      115(95)                    587(95)

Dagg v. Minister of Finance (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 24786, *B                                     1308(95)

D'Amato v. Badger (B.C.), 24364, *03 2.3.95                                                  14(95)                      463(95)

D'Amore Construction (Windsor) Ltd. v. The Queen (Ont.),

   24372, *02 23.2.95                                                                                    13(95)                      386(95)

David Hunt Farms Ltd. v. Minister of Agriculture (F.C.A.)(Ont.),

   24281, *02 2.2.95                                                                                     1511(94)                   249(95)

Davidovits v. Bank of Credit and Commerce Canada (Ont.),

   24957, *A                                                                                                 1753(95)

Debra P. v. The Queen (Ont.), 24823, *A                                                       1753(95)

DeCoste v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24306, *01 2.3.95                                  8(95)                        459(95)

De Francesca v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24767, *B                                      1759(95)

Dell Holdings Ltd. v. Toronto Area Transit Operating Authority

   (Ont.), 24695, *03 9.11.95                                                                         1208(95)                   1765(95)

Dempsey v. The Queen (Crim.)(N.S.), 24888, *A                                            1521(95)

Derksen Brothers Holdings Ltd. v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce

   (Man.), 24765, *B                                                                                     1583(95)

Désaulniers c. La Reine (Crim.)(Qué.), 24356, *01 19.1.95                               1772(94)                   40(95)

Devereaux v. Morrow (Ont.), 23798, *A                                                           2068(93)

Dewald v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24363, *03 2.2.95                                     1774(94)                   247(95)

Dick v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 24059, *01 2.2.95                                        730(94)                    245(95)

Didone c. Didone-Gagnon (Qué.), 24440, *02 23.2.95                                      240(95)                    380(95)

Directeur de la protection de la jeunesse c. Dubois (Qué.),

   24953, *A                                                                                                 1714(95)

Disco Gas & Oil Ltd. v. Petro-Canada Inc. (B.C.), 24379, *02

   2.2.95  56(94)                                                                                           251(95)

D'Onofrio v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24277, *01 2.2.95                                  1510(94)                   253(95)

Dorscheid v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 24420, *01 16.2.95                              21(95)                      339(95)

Dubasz v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 24874, *B                                              1788(95)

Dubé c. Bélec (Qué.), 24759, *02 28.9.95                                                       1218(95)                   1394(95)

Dubé c. Ville de Hull (Qué.), 24760, *02 28.9.95                                             1218(95)                   1394(95)

Dubeau c. Gestion Jean-Paul Rickner Ltée (Qué.), 24701, *02

   7.9.95  1204(95)                                                                                       1350(95)

Dubuc v. Workers Compensation Board of Manitoba (Man.),

   24569, *02 14.9.95                                                                                    841(95)                    1356(95)

Dumesnil c. Dionne (Crim.)(Qué.), 24618, *02 8.6.95                                       736(95)                    1048(95)

Dundas v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(Alta.), 24591, *02 14.9.95                                670(95)                    1354(95)

Dupont Canada Inc. v. AlliedSignal Inc. (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 24781, *B                    1755(95)

Dussiaume v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24777, *B                                          1383(95)

E. A. Manning Ltd. v. Ontario Securities Commission (Ont.),

   24773, *02 17.8.95                                                                                    1304(95)                   1316(95)

Eakin v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24451, *01 23.3.95                                     116(95)                    587(95)

Eldridge v. Attorney General of British Columbia (B.C.),

   24896, *A                                                                                                 1522(95)

Elgersma (Leo) v. Attorney General for Ontario (Ont.), 24347, *03

   2.2.95                                                                                                      1844(94)                   248(95)

Elgersma (Melvin) v. Minister of Agriculture for Canada (F.C.A.)(Ont.),

   24658, *01 14.9.95                                                                                    1043(95)                   1358(95)

Elguindy v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24736, *A                                              1338(95)

Eljer Manufacturing Canada Inc. c. Syndicat national des

   salariés des outils Simonds (C.S.N.) (Qué.), 24683, *02 Lamer C.J.

   dissenting 29.6.95                                                                                    1046(95)                   1225(95)

Elliott v. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (Ont.), 24895, *A                         1521(95)

Ellis-Don Ltd. v. Ontario Labour Relations Board (Ont.),

   24243, *02 12.1.95                                                                                    1324(94)                   37(95)

Eltassi v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 24679, *01 28.9.95                                   1078(95)                   1397(95)

Eneas v. The Queen (Crim.)(B.C.), 24086, *B                                                 732(94)

Entreprise Maridey Inc. c. Procureur général du Québec

   (Qué.), 24536, *A                                                                                      1337(95)

Erdman v. Chaput (Ont.), 24686, *02 16.11.95                                                1191(95)                   1793(95)

Ernst & Young Inc. v. B.J. Robertson & Associates Ltd. (Alta.),

   24545, *02 9.11.95                                                                                    545(95)                    1767(95)

Ernst & Young Inc. v. Dylex Ltd. (Ont.), 24557, *02 22.6.95                             665(95)                    1117(95)

Ernst & Young Inc. v. Price Waterhouse Ltd. (Ont.), 24259, *03 2.2.95            1329(94)                   255(95)

Escobar-Molina v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24473, *05 11.5.95                       865(95)                    865(95)

Exarhos c. Bank of Nova Scotia (Qué.), 24608, *02 15.6.95                            826(95)                    1085(95)

Fabrikant c. Adolph (Qué.), 24655, *02 19.10.95                                            1525(95)                   1588(95)

Fabrikant c. The Queen (Crim.)(Qué.), 24677, *01 17.8.95                              1190(95)                   1314(95)

Falkenberg v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 24493, *01 22.6.95                            656(95)                    1116(95)

Farber c. Royal Trust Co. (Qué.), 24885, *A                                                   1521(95)

Farshid-Ghazi v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24561, *01 28.9.95                         582(95)                    1400(95)

Fazl v. Minister of Citizenship and Immigration (F.C.A.)(Crim.)(Ont.),

   24973, *A                                                                                                 1754(95)

Fecteau c. Hôpital St. François d'Assise (Qué.), 24518, *02 27.4.95                 660(95)                    742(95)

Fenney v. The Queen (Crim.)(B.C.), 24752, *03 9.11.95                                  1209(95)                   1768(95)

Fieldhouse v. The Queen (Ont.), 24785, *B                                                    1841(95)

Fiji v. Law Society of Upper Canada (Ont.), 24923, *A                                     1840(95)

Fletcher v. Scurry-Rainbow Oil Ltd. (Alta.), 24404, *02 30.3.95                         17(95)                      615(95)

Fong v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 24448, *01 23.2.95                                     116(95)                    381(95)

Fontaine c. La Reine (Qué.), 24734, *01 7.9.95                                               1197(95)                   1349(95)

Forseth v. Attorney General for British Columbia (B.C.),

   24927, *A                                                                                                 1652(95)

Foshay v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24274, *01 27.4.95                                   530(95)                    740(95)

Foster c. Procureur général de la province de Québec (Qué.),

   24858, *A                                                                                                 1338(95)

Fou du Roi Inc. c. Morin (Qué.), 24463, *02 9.3.95                                          337(95)                    503(95)

Foulston v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 24529, *01 18.5.95                                454(95)                    852(95)

Fountain v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24716, *B                                              1107(95)

Fraternité des policiers de la communauté urbaine de Montréal c.

   Communauté urbaine de Montréal (Qué.), 24445, *02 2.3.95                         300(95)                    462(95)

Fraternité des préposés à l'entretien des voies c. Compagnie

   des chemins de fer nationaux du Canada (C.A.F.)(Qué.),

   24868, *A                                                                                                 1378(95)

French v. Bernardo (Crim.)(Ont.), 24748, *01 15.6.95                                      1083(95)                   1088(95)

Friday v. Attorney General for Ontario (Ont.), 24639, *02 6.7.95                       992(95)                    1229(95)

Funk (Harold Chalmers) v. Royal Bank of Canada (Ont.), 24443, *02

   30.3.95                                                                                                    292(95)                    608(95)

Funk (Steven Christopher) v. Labus Investments Ltd. (B.C.), 24416, *01

   1.6.95  125(95)                                                                                         1005(95)

G & W Electric Ltd. c. Commission Hydro-Électrique du Québec

   (Hydro-Québec), (Qué.), 24996, *A                                                             1840(95)

G.W.M. v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24394, *01 16.3.95                                  232(95)                    550(95)

Gadoury c. Fortin (Qué.), 24738, *02 21.9.95                                                  1299(95)                   1387(95)

Galuego (Leonardo) v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 24580, *01 28.9.95               668(95)                    1400(95)

Galuego (Rosario) v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 24581, *01 28.9.95                 669(95)                    1401(95)

Gardner (Arnold) v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24596, *03 1.6.95                       655(95)                    999(95)

Gardner (Steven Joseph) v. The Queen (Crim.)(B.C.), 24678, *01

   7.9.95  1196(95)                                                                                       1348(95)

Garnett v. Attorney General of New Brunswick (N.B.), 24507, *05

   3.3.95  511(95)                                                                                         511(95)

Garrett v. Clayton (B.C.), 24685, *02 2.11.95                                                  1106(95)                   1722(95)

Gaucher c. J. M. Asbestos Inc. (Qué.), 24441, *02 2.3.95                               302(95)                    462(95)

Gendron c. 2968-1467 Québec Inc. (Qué.), 24555, *02 27.4.95                        585(95)                    741(95)

General Accident Assurance Co. of Canada v. State Farm Mutual

   Automobile Insurance Co. (N.B.), 24998, *A                                               1840(95)

George v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 24722, *02 6.7.95                                   994(95)                    1228(95)

Gerber Scientific Instrument Co. v. Bell-Northern Research Ltd. (Ont.),

   24449, *02 18.5.95                                                                                    296(95)                    849(95)

Germain c. Procureur général du Québec (Qué.), 24964, *A                             1714(95)

Gestion Gilles Ménard Inc. c. Filion (Qué.), 24375, *02 9.11.95                        1858(94)                   1767(95)

Gharavy c. Institut Philippe Pinel (Qué.), 24460, *01 17.2.95                            301(95)                    378(95)

Giles v. Giles (Alta.), 25002, *A                                                                    1840(95)

Gillen v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24801, *01 19.10.95                                   1382(95)                   1587(95)

Gillis v. The Queen (Crim.)(N.S.), 24453, *01 30.3.95                                      233(95                     612(95)

Girard c. Moisan (Qué.), 24704, *02 29.6.95                                                   1110(95)                   1223(95)

Glengarry Memorial Hospital v. Pay Equity Hearings Tribunal (Ont.),

   24757, *02 28.9.95                                                                                    1307(95)                   1395(95)

Goodswimmer v. Attorney General of Canada (F.C.A.)(Alta.), 24737, *03

   19.10.95                                                                                                  1301(95)                   1590(95)

Goodswimmer v. Attorney General of Canada (F.C.A.)(Alta.), 24745, *03

   19.10.95                                                                                                  1301(95)                   1590(95)

Gorman c. Azrieli (Qué.), 24926, *05 10.11.95                                                1652(95)                   1802(95)

Governing Council of the Universsity of Toronto v. Budget Rent A Car

   of Edmonton Ltd. (Alta. ), 24647, *02 11.10.95                                            995(95)                    1568(95)

Government of Saskatchewan v. Pasiechnyk (Sask.), 24913, *A                     1581(95)

Government of the Yukon v. Taga Ku Development Corporation (Yuk.),

   24938, *A                                                                                                 1653(95)

Goyette c. Laporte (Qué.), 24659, *02 15.6.95                                                827(95)                    1086(95)

Graham Construction and Engineering (1985) Ltd. v. Thunderbrick Ltd.

   (Sask.), 24762, *02 16.11.95                                                                     1340(95)                   1794(95)

Gramaglia v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 24707, *01 28.9.95                              1080(95)                   1403(95)

Grant v. Attorney General of Canada (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 24890, *A                        1522(95)

Gray v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24532, *01 6.7.95                                        839(95)                    1230(95)

Greenbaum c. Public Curator of Quebec (Qué.), 24434, *02 2.3.95                  126(95)                    460(95)

Greenpeace Canada v. MacMillan Bloedel Ltd. (B.C.), 24437, *03

   1.6.95  238(95)                                                                                         1006(95)

Grenkow v. The Queen (Crim.)(N.S.), 24616, *01 15.6.95                                764(95)                    1085(95)

Gresham v. Ernst & Young Inc. (Sask.), 22888, *A                                         716(92)

Guns N'Roses Missouri Storm Inc. c. Productions Musicales

   Donald K. Donald Inc. (Qué.), 24286, *02 2.2.95                                          1562(94)                   255(95)

Guzyk v. Hare (B.C.), 24373, *02 2.3.95                                                        1851(94)                   464(95)

Gymnase Longueuil Inc. c. Construction Dupal Inc. (Qué.), 24348, *01

   26.1.95                                                                                                    1960(94)                   128(95)

H.A. c. M.T. (Qué.), 24534, *02 29.6.95                                                         827(95)                    1225(95)

Haberman v. Peixeiro (Ont.), 24981, *A                                                         1783(95)

Haisman v. Haisman (Alta.), 24589, *01 14.9.95                                             737(95)                    1355(95)

Hammami v. College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia

   (B.C.), 24708, *02 28.9.95                                                                         1201(95)                   1404(95)

Hasan v. Council of the College of Physicians and Surgeons

   of New Brunswick (N.B.), 24398, *02 18.5.95                                              29(95)                      846(95)

Hatton v. Dagneault (B.C.), 24799, *B                                                            1760(95)

Haughton v. Parker (Ont.), 24710, *02 2.11.95                                               1203(95)                   1724(95)

Hawrish v. Saskatchewan Trust Co. (Sask.), 24884, *A                                   1379(95)

Hay v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24480, *01 1.6.95                                         535(95)                    1006(95)

Hayes v. Hayes (N.B.), 24876, *A                                                                  1379(95)

Hayoun c. Compagnie T. Eaton Ltée (Qué.), 24501, *02 16.3.95                       457(95)                    552(95)

D.H. c. S.B. (Qué.), 24526, *02 6.4.95                                                           548(95)                    677(95)

D.H. c. S.B. (Qué.), 24559, *02 6.4.95                                                           549(95)                    678(95)

Hennick v. Attorney General of Canada (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 24699, *01

   26.10.95                                                                                                  1209(95)                   1660(95)

Henry v. The Queen (Crim.)(B.C.), 24384, *01 30.3.95                                     1958(94)                   614(95)

Hercules Managements Ltd. v. Ernst & Young (Man.), 24882, *A                     1379(95)

Hershkovitz c. La Reine (Crim.)(Qué.), 24417, *01 2.3.95                                123(95)                    467(95)

Hill v. Attorney General of Nova Scotia (N.S.), 24782, *B                                 1757(95)

Hinchey v. The Queen (Crim.)(Nfld.), 24430, *03 30.3.95                                 298(95)                    618(95)

Hinse c. La Reine (Crim.)(Qué.), 24320, *01 26.1.95                                       1679(94)                   129(95)

Holland v. United States of America (Crim.)(Ont.), 24503, *01

   8.6.95  658(95)                                                                                         1049(95)

Holmes v. McGrath (N.W.T.), 24730, *02 28.9.95                                            1217(95)                   1405(95)

Holt v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 24362, *01 12.1.95                                       1769(94)                   33(95)

Howe v. Professional Conduct Committee (Ont.), 24275, *02 2.2.95                 1333(94)                   252(95)

Hunter v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24552, *01 14.9.95                                    578(95)                    1353(95)

Husky Oil Operations Ltd. v. Saint John Shipbuilding Ltd. (Nfld.),

   24855, *A                                                                                                 1783(95)

Imperial Oil Ltd. v. Superintendent of Pensions for the province

   of N.S. (N.S.), 24859, *A                                                                           1338(95)

Insurance Corporation of British Columbia v. Manitoba Public

   Insurance Coropration (B.C.), 24935, *A                                                     1653(95)

J.F. c. M.G. (Qué.), 24796, *02 19.10.95                                                        1525(95)                   1588(95)

J.F.S. c. E.V. (Qué.), 24817, *02 9.11.95                                                       1345(95)                   1766(95)

JMSC Holdings Inc. v. Oshawa Group Ltd. (N.S.), 24617, *02

   26.10.95                                                                                                  1208(95)                   1660(95)

Jackson v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 24241, *01 2.2.95                                  1247(94)                   252(95)

Jacquard v. The Queen (Crim.)(N.S.), 24660, *03 11.10.95                              1077(95)                   1568(95)

Jacques c. La Reine (Crim.)(Qué.), 24012, *05 17.2.95                                   395(95)                    395(95)

Jaffe v. Miller (Ont.), 24971, *A                                                                     1754(95)

Jansen v. Kroeker (B.C.), 24763, *02 2.11.95                                                 1344(95)                   1722(95)

Jaslowski v. The Queen in right of the province of Manitoba

   (Man.), 24968, *A                                                                                     1753(95)

Johnson (Clayton Norman) v. The Queen (Crim.)(N.S.), 24133, *01 2.2.95        1319(94)                   249(95)

Johnson (Stanley Gordon) v. The Queen (N.S.), 24862, *A                              1338(95)

Jones v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 23667, *03 22.12.94                                  1467(93)                   33(95)

Judges of the Provincial Court of Manitoba as represented by

   the Manitoba Provincial Judges Association v. The Queen

   in right of the province of Manitoba (Man.), 24846, *B                                  1786(95)

K.L. v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24651, *01 6.7.95                                         907(95)                    1231(95)

Kaban v. Sett (Man.), 24444, *02 30.3.95                                                      236(95)                    613(95)

Kalin v. City of Calgary (Alta.), 24418, *A                                                       1799(94)

Kalmacoff v. Richardson Greenshields of Canada Ltd. (Ont.), 24758, *02

   28.9.95                                                                                                    1139(95)                   1395(95)

Kansa General Insurance Co. v. Simcoe & Erie General

   Insurance Co. (B.C.), 24368, *02 2.3.95                                                      30(95)                      466(95)

Karpiel v. Pelican (Ont.), 24490, *02 25.5.95                                                  295(95)                    913(95)

Kartsonas v. Grey (B.C.), 24825, *B                                                              1718(95)

Kathleen H. v. Ross (Ont.), 24823, *A                                                           1337(95)

Kawula v. Metropolitan Trust Co. of Canada (Sask.), 24988, *A                        1784(95)

Kerrar c. Souyad (Qué.), 24470, *02 23.2.95                                                   242(95)                    382(95)

Kerrar c. Souyad (Qué.), 24479, *02 23.2.95                                                   241(95)                    382(95)

Kieling v. Saskatchewan Wheat Pool (Sask.), 24285, *02 12.1.95                    1556(94)                   38(95)

Kindret v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(Crim.)(Man.), 24215, *01 12.1.95                      1331(94)                   37(95)

Klevering v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24619, *01 28.9.95                                766(95)                    1397(95)

Kopyto v. Law Society of Upper Canada (Ont.), 24723, *02 28.9.95                  1214(95)                   1398(95)

Korkontzilas v. Soulos (Ont.), 24949, *A                                                        1784(95)

Kosanovich v. Byers Transport Ltd. (F.C.A.)(Alta.), 24944, *A                          1712(95)

Krusel v. Firth (B.C.), 24764, *02 2.11.95                                                       1380(95)                   1723(95)

Kubel v. Kubel (Alta.), 24806, *05 27.10.95                                                    1729(95)                   1729(95)

Kujawa v. Milgaard (Sask.), 24382, *02 2.2.95                                                1855(94)                   250(95)

L.L.A. v. A.B. (Crim.)(Ont.), 24568, *03 17.3.95                                              541(95)                    554(95)

Lacey v. United States of America (Crim.)(Ont.), 24800, *B                             1309(95)

Laidlaw Carriers Inc. v. Ford (Ont.), 24539, *02 22.6.95                                   657(95)                    1116(95)

Landry c. La Reine (C.A.F.)(Qué.), 24370, *01 26.1.95                                    1854(94)                   130(95)

Langer v. MacMillan Bloedel (B.C.), 24437, *B                                                238(95)

Langner v. Minister of Employment and Immigration (F.C.A.)(Ont.),

   24740, *02 17.8.95                                                                                    1103(95)                   1313(95)

Lareau c. Productions mise en scène Ltée (Qué.), 24841, *A                           1713(95)

Lasecki v. The Queen (Alta.), 24983, *A                                                        1783(95)

Latimer v. The Queen (Crim.)(Sask.), 24818, *A                                             1713(95)

Lavoie c. Procureur général du Québec (Qué.), 24674, *02 7.9.95                     911(95)                    1348(95)

Lawrence v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 24524, *01 22.6.95                               663(95)                    1117(95)

Laws v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24504, *01 30.3.95                                      371(95)                    609(95)

Lawson v. The Queen (Crim.)(B.C.), 24331, *01 19.1.95                                  1850(94)                   42(95)

Lehndorff United Properties (Canada) Ltd. v. City of Edmonton

   (Alta.), 24412, *02 18.5.95                                                                         120(95)                    848(95)

Leiriao c. Ville de Val-Bélair (Qué.), 24967, *A                                                1714(95)

Lemky v. The Queen (Crim.)(B.C.), 24454, *03 2.3.95                                     10(95)                      458(95)

Leon v. United States of America (Crim.)(Ont.), 24522, *03

   26.10.95                                                                                                  666(95)                    1661(95)

Letourneau v. The Queen (Crim.)(B.C.), 24645, *01 2.11.95                             1192(95)                   1723(95)

Levert v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24411, *01 27.4.95                                    372(95)                    743(95)

Lewis (Irene Marie) v. Minister of Education for British

   Columbia (B.C.), 24514, *02 21.9.95                                                          822(95)                    1390(95)

Lewis (Paul Leeann) v. The Queen in right of the province

   of British Columbia (B.C.), 24999, *A                                                         1840(95)

Libman c. Attorney General of Quebec (Qué.), 24960, *A                                1753(95)

Liotta v. Emery (Ont.), 24697, *02 28.9.95                                                      1211(95)                   1404(95)

Liquor Depot at Callingwook Ltd. v. City of Edmonton (Alta.),

   24914, *A                                                                                                 1581(95)

Litchfield v. Vanderkerkhove (B.C.), 24630, *02 28.9.95                                  911(95)                    1402(95)

Lo v. The Queen (B.C.), 24928, *A                                                                1652(95)

Logozar v. Golder (Alta.), 24406, *02 18.5.95                                                 125(95)                    851(95)

Loken v. Attorney General of Canada (F.C.A.)(B.C.), 24853, *A                       1337(95)

Lowther v. The Queen (P.E.I.), 24735, *B                                                       1206(95)

Loya v. Cooper (Ont.), 24574, *02 22.6.95                                                      767(95)                    1118(95)

Lozinski v. Agricultural Credit Corporation of Saskatchewan

   (Sask.), 24326, *02 26.1.95                                                                       1681(94)                   132(95)

Ludmer v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 24573, *01 26.10.95                               659(95)                    1661(95)

Ludwig v. Crick (B.C.), 24327, *02 2.3.95                                                       1773(94)                   464(95)

Luscar Ltd. v. Pembina Resources Ltd. (Alta.), 24496, *02

   17.8.95                                                                                                    455(95)                    1311(95)

M.D.C. v. The Queen (Crim.)(B.C.), 24811, *01 14.9.95                                   1304(95)                   1352(95)

M.S. v. The Queen (Crim.)(B.C.), 24431, *02 23.2.95                                      23(95)                      383(95)

MacIsaac v. MacNeil (N.S.), 24180, *01 23.2.95                                             1957(94)                   385(95)

Mackie v. Milgaard (Sask.), 24382, *02 2.2.95                                                1855(94)                   250(95)

Mackinnon v. Attorney General of Canada (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 24624, *02

   7.9.95  840(95)                                                                                         1347(95)

MacNeil v. The Queen (Crim.)(N.S.), 24665, *01 14.9.95                                 908(95)                    1356(95)

MacNeill v. Attorney General of Canada (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 24231,

   *02 12.1.95                                                                                              1322(94)                   36(95)

Malhotra (Charles C. M.) v. Ontario Human Rights Commission

   (Ont.), 24969, *A                                                                                      1753(95)

Malhotra (Prem) v. Minister of Transport (F.CA.)(Ont.), 24975, *A                     1754(95)

Manj v. The Queen (Crim.)(B.C.), 24870, *B                                                   1785(95)

Manley v. Clarfield (Ont.), 24476, *01 30.3.95                                                 330(95)                    609(95)

Manning v. Corporation of Delta (B.C.), 24789, *A                                           1186(95)

Manulife Bank of Canada v. Conlin (Ont.), 24499, *03 4.5.95                           453(95)                    775(95)

Mara Properties Ltd. v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(B.C.), 24684, *03

   11.10.95                                                                                                  1102(95)                   1568(95)

Marchés Bonanza (Lachine) Inc. c. Procureur général du Québec

   (Qué.), 24547, *02 18.5.95                                                                         536(95)                    854(95)

Marchés Bonanza (Lachine) Inc. c. Procureur général du Québec

   (Qué.), 24548, *02 18.5.95                                                                         537(95)                    854(95)

Marinaro v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24322, *01 27.4.95                                 531(95)                    740(95)

Mattice v. The Queen (Crim.)(B.C.), 24808, *01 26.10.95                                 1558(95)                   1659(95)

McCabe v. The Queen (Crim.)(B.C.), 24602, *01 28.9.95                                 739(95)                    1402(95)

McDonnell v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 24814, *B                                           1755(95)

McDowall v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24390, *01 30.3.95                                299(95)                    616(95)

McGillivary v. Province of New Brunswick (N.B.), 24336, *02

   23.3.95                                                                                                    1848(94)                   588(95)

McLeod v. Law Society of Saskatchewan (Sask.), 24459, *02 15.6.95              122(95)                    1087(95)

McMaster v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 24395, *03 2.3.95                                449(95)                    459(95)

McMaster v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 24569, *A                                            328(95)

McMillan v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24570, *01 1.6.95                                  543(95)                    1004(95)

McMillan Bloedel Ltd. v. Galiano Island Trust Committee

   (B.C.), 24941, *A                                                                                      1712(95)

McMillan Bloedel Ltd. v. The Queen in right of the province

   of British Columbia (B.C.), 24987, *A                                                         1783(95)

McPhillips v. British Columbia Ferry Corporation (B.C.),

   24246, *02 26.1.95                                                                                    1329(94)                   134(95)

Meditrust Pharmacy Services Inc. c. Ordre des Pharmaciens

   du Québec (Qué.), 24487, *02 30.3.95                                                        376(95)                    611(95)

Merck & Co. v. Apotex Inc. (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 24751, *B                                      1341(95)

Merck Frosst Canada Inc. v. Minister of National Health and

   Welfare (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 24260, *02 2.2.95                                                   1318(94)                   257(95)

Meubles du Québec Inspiration XIX^e Ltée c. Ville de

   Chicoutimi (Qué.), 24355, *02 26.1.95                                                         1858(94)                   134(95)

Michaud v. Bank of Montreal (N.B.), 24497, *02 25.5.95                                  332(95)                    913(95)

Minister of Justice of Canada c. Jamieson (Crim.)(Qué.), 24253, *03

   2.2.95  77(94)                                                                                           256(95)

Ministry of Labour for the Province of Ontario, Employment Standards

   Branch v. Zittrer, Siblin & Associates Inc. (Ont.), 24711, *05

   30.8.95                                                                                                    1193(95)                   1373(95)

Moghbel c. The Queen (C.A.F.)(Qué.), 24307, *02 26.10.95                             842(95)                    1662(95)

Mohan v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 24523, *01 18.5.95                                   536(95)                    853(95)

Moldowan v. Saskatchewan Government Employees Union (Sask.),

   24954, *A                                                                                                 1753(95)

Momeni v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24900, *A                                               1557(95)

Morin (Ivan Joseph) v. The Queen (Sask.), 24894, *A                                     1521(95)

Morin (Richard W. O.) v. Board of School Trustees of Regional

   Administration Unit No. 3 (P.E.I.), 24614, *02 14.9.95                                  909(95)                    1357(95)

Morrissey v. Morrissey (P.E.I.), 24202, *02 12.1.95                                         1322(94)                   36(95)

Multitech Warehouse (Manitoba) Direct Inc. v. The Queen (Crim.)(Man.),

   24950, *A                                                                                                 1713(95)

Municipalité de la paroisse de Ste-Rose-du-Nord c. Procureur

   général du Québec (Qué.), 24354, *02 16.2.95                                             1854(94)                   339(95)

NB Power Corporation v. Sivret (N.B.), 24538, *02 22.6.95                               580(95)                    1116(95)

Nagel v. Hunter (Alta.), 24609, *02 8.6.95                                                      822(95)                    1048(95)

Nand v. Edmonton Public School District # 7 (Alta.), 24500, *02 27.4.95          373(95)                    744(95)

Naredo v. Minister of Employment and Immigration (F.C.A.)(Ont.),

   24820, *B                                                                                                 1561(95)

Nasssar v. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Manitoba (Man.),

   24893, *A                                                                                                 1521(95)

National Parole Board v. Mooring (Crim.)(B.C.), 24436, *03

   15.12.94                                                                                                  1953(94)                   52(95)

Neuberger v. Connors (Ont.), 24346, *02 2.3.95                                              22(95)                      465(95)

Newfoundland Association of Public Employees v. The Queen in

   right of Newfoundland (Nfld.), 24525, *03 4.5.95                                           543(95)                    773(95)

Newfoundland Telephone Co. v. Canadian Radio-Television and

   Telecommunications Commission (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 24705, *02 21.9.95            1200(95)                   1392(95)

Noble v. First City Trust Co. (Alta.), 24403, *02 30.3.95                                  16(95)                      615(95)

Noftall v. The Queen (Crim.)(Nfld.), 24426, *01 18.5.95                                    118(95)                    846(95)

Northeast Marine Services Ltd. v. Atlantic Pilotage Authority

   (F.C.A.)(N.S.), 24629, *03 6.11.95                                                              1563(95)                   1762(95)

Nuosci v. Royal Canadian Mounted Police (F.C.A.)(Crim.)(Ont.),

   24689, *02 17.8.95                                                                                    1076(95)                   1312(95)

O.E.X. Electromagnetic Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand (B.C.), 24886,

   *A        1521(95)

Ochapowace First Nation v. V. A.  (Sask.), 24571, *02 8.6.95                          667(95)                    1049(95)

O'Connor v. The Queen (Ont.), 24952, *A                                                       1753(95)

Oduneye v. The Queen (Alta.), 25000, *A                                                       1840(95)

Olson v. Law Society of Manitoba (Man.), 24803, *B                                       1559(95)

Omar C. v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24283, *05 (as of right) 27.2.95                475(95)                    475(95)

Omar C. v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24283, *01 2.10.95                                 1220(95)                   1527(95)

Oniel v. Marks (Ont.), 24977, *A                                                                   1754(95)

Osbourne v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24595, *01 1.6.95                                 661(95)                    1000(95)

P.L. v. Director of Child Welfare (Nfld.), 23886, *01

   2.2.95  93(93)                                                                                           252(95)

P. (S.) c. R. (M.) (Qué.), 24251, *03 2.2.95                                                     1239(4)                    255(95)

Pacific Fishermen's Alliance v. The Queen (B.C.), 24750, *B                           1384(95)

Painchaud v. Yorkton Securities Inc. (Alta.), 24749, *02 14.9.95                      1301(95)                   1360(95)

Paintings, Drawings and Photographic Slides of Paintings v.

   The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24791, the application for leave to

   appeal and the application for leave to cross-appeal

   are dismissed 11.10.95                                                                             1294(95)                   1566(95)

Pamajewon v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24596, *03 1.6.95                              655(95)                    999(95)

Paramadevan v. Semelhago (Ont.), 24325, *03 2.2.95                                     1682(94)                   253(95)

Pascal v. The Queen (B.C.), 24638, *02 6.7.95                                              990(95)                    1228(95)

Patenaude c. Procureur général du Québec (Qué.), 24415, *02

   23.2.95                                                                                                    302(95)                    380(95)

Pathak v. Canadian Human Rights Council (F.C.A.)(B.C.), 24809, *B               1385(95)

Patrick Press Ltd. v. Pierre (B.C.), 23837, *A                                                 2069(93)

Patterson v. Chrastina (Ont.), 24864, *A                                                        1378(95)

Pearson c. Procureur général du Canada (Qué.), 24929/30/31, *A                     1712(95)

Peat Marwick Thorne Inc. v. Atherley (Ont.), 24681, *02 22.6.95                      907(95)                    1113(95)

Peckham v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24401, *01 23.2.95                               1955(94)                   383(95)

Pennie v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24432, *01 18.5.95                                   237(95)                    851(95)

Peroux c. Cité de la Santé de Laval (Qué.), 24464, *02 9.3.95                          335(95)                    502(95)

Peters v. The Queen (Crim.)(Sask.), 24391, *01 23.2.95                                 7(95)                        378(95)

Petrini v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(Crim.)(Ont.), 24433, *02 23.2.95                        28(95)                      379(95)

Philippe c. Université de Montréal (Qué.), 24807, *02 21.9.95                           1303(95)                   1388(95)

Pilote c. Corporation de l'hôpital Bellechasse de Montréal

   (Qué.), 24419, *02 2.3.95                                                                           25(95)                      466(95)

Pocklington v. Gainers Inc. (Alta.), 24856, *A                                                1337(95)

Poirier c. Ville de Lachine (Qué.), 24836, *02 9.11.95                                      1293(95)                   1763(95)

Portree v. Woodsmill Homes Ltd. (Man.), 24289, *02 12.1.95                          1557(94)                   39(95)

Poznekoff v. Elasoff (B.C.), 24572, *01 1.6.95                                               663(95)                    1000(95)

Prince Rupert Grain Ltd. v. International Longshoremen's and

   Warehousemen's Union, Ship and Dock Foremen, Local

   514 (F.C.A)(B.C.), 24428, *03 30.3.95                                                        117(95)                    610(95)

Prince Rupert Hotel (1957) Ltd. v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(B.C.),

   24755, *02 21.9.95                                                                                    1300(95)                   1390(95)

Procureur général du Canada c. Hydro-Québec (Qué.), 24652, *03

   11.10.95                                                                                                  1043(95)                   1564(95)

Procureur général du Québec c. 2747-3174 Québec Inc. (Qué.),

   24309, *03 2.3.95                                                                                     239(95)                    461(95)

Procureur général du Québec c. Guimond (Qué.), 24625, *03 1.6.95                 771(95)                    1002(95)

Purolator Courier Ltd. v. Meditek Laboratory Services Ltd. (Man.),

   24903, *A                                                                                                 1580(95)

R. v. Adams (Crim.)(Alta.), 24252, *03 6.2.95                                                 1896(94)                   306(95)

R. c. Aubin (Crim.)(Qué.), 24350, *01 19.1.95                                                 1777(94)                   41(95)

R. v. Austin (Crim.)(B.C.), 24486, *03 30.3.95                                                231(95)                    610(95)

R. v. Calder Crim.)((Ont.), 24323, *01 23.2.95                                                 7(95)                        381(95)

R. v. Campbell (Crim.)(Alta.), 24831, *B                                                         1785(95)

R. v. Carlile (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 24955, *A                                                            1713(95)

R. c. Chevrier (Qué.), 23126, *A                                                                    2510(92)

R. v. D.E.F. (Crim.)(Alta.), 24587, *01 1.6.95                                                  670(95)                    1000(95)

R. v. Fibreco Pulp Inc. (F.C.A.), 24918, *A                                                    1581(95)

R. v. Fisher (Crim.)(Ont.), 24102, *01 2.2.95                                                   875(94)                    245(95)

R. v. Follett (Crim.)(Nfld.), 24775, *01 16.11.95                                               1715(95)                   1792(95)

R. c. Gauthier (Crim.)(Qué.), 24234, *01 2.3.95                                               15(95)                      467(95)

R. v. Gillis (Crim.)(N.B.), 24621, *01 14.9.95                                                  994(95)                    1357(95)

R. v. Green (Crim.)(Nfld.), 24753, *01 26.10.95                                               1207(95)                   1659(95)

R. v. Halliday (Ont.), 24907, *A                                                                     1580(95)

R. v. Keegstra (Alta.), 24296, application for leave to

   appeal, reduced to a single constitutional ground, is dismissed

   la demande d'autorisation de pourvoi, réduite à un seul

   moyen constitutionnel, est rejetée 18.5.95                                                  1674(94)                   845(95)

R. v. L.T.C. (Crim.)(Nfld.), 24502, *01 29.6.95                                                 533(95)                    1226(95)

R. v. Lambert (Crim.)(Nfld.), 24378, *01 23.2.95                                              12(95)                      385(95)

R. v. Lima-Fernandez (Crim.)(Ont.), 24466, *05 16.3.95                                   559(95)                    559(95)

R. c. Laporte (Crim.)(Qué.), 24551, *03 1.6.95                                                531(95)                    998(95)

R. v. MacLeod (Crim.)(N.B.), 24397, *01 9.3.95                                              12(95)                      505(95)

R. v. Marrie (Crim.)(Nfld.), 24471, *01 18.5.95                                                 119(95)                    847(95)

R. v. Marwin G. (Crim.)(Ont.), 24484, *01 23.3.95                                            292(95)                    587(95)

R. v. Marwin G. (Crim.)(Ont.), 24484, *05 5.5.95                                             832(95)                    832(95)

R. v. McCormack (Crim.)(Ont.), 24873, *A                                                     1378(95)

R. v. Michaud (Crim.)(N.B.), 24798, *03 11.10.95                                            1307(95)                   1566(95)

R. v. Nikolovski (Crim.)(Ont.), 24360, *03 1.6.95                                            544(95)                    1004(95)

R. c. Patoine (Crim.)(Qué.), 24867, *B                                                           1843(95)

R. v. Peterson (Crim.)(B.C.), 24421, *01 23.2.95                                             20(95)                      379(95)

R. v. R.A.M. (Crim.)(Man.), 24475, *01 18.5.95                                               535(95)                    853(95)

R. v. Rarru (Crim.)(B.C.), 24816, *B                                                               1585(95)

R. c. Richard (Crim.)(N.-B.), 24582, *03 1.6.95                                               654(95)                    998(95)

R. v. Robinson (Crim.)(B.C.), 24302, *03 2.3.95                                              1953(94)                   458(95)

R. v. Royal Bank of Canada (Alta.), 24713, *03 11.10.95                                 1197(95)                   1565(95)

R. c. Sadek (Qué.), 24979, *A                                                                      1783(95)

R. c. Simard (Crim.)(Qué.), 24408, *01 2.3.95                                                 15(95)                      465(95)

R. v. Spellacy (Nfld.), 24837, *A                                                                    1293(95)

R. v. Sylliboy (Crim.)(N.S.), 21929, *A                                                           1015(90)

R. v. Sylvester (B.C.), 24891, *A                                                                   1522(95)

R. v. Tarnovsky (Crim.)(Ont.), 24772, *01 11.10.95                                         1343(95)                   1567(95)

R. v. Tricker (Crim.)(Ont.), 24592, *B                                                             661(95)

R. v. Wolfe (Sask.), 24993, *A                                                                      1784(95)

R. in right of the province of British Columbia v. National

   Bank of Canada (B.C.), 24509, *02 28.9.95                                                 373(95)                    1399(95)

R.J.G. v. J.R.G. (Sask.), 24622, *03 1.6.95                                                   769(95)                    1007(95)

R.J.S. v. The Queen (Crim.)(N.S.), 24866, *01 2.11.95                                    1378(95)                   1721(95)

R.L. c. J.M. (Qué.), 24537, *02 9.3.95                                                            338(95)                    503(95)

R.M.G. v. The Queen (Crim.)(B.C.), 24709, *03 11.10.95                                 1075(95)                   1565(95)

Radassao v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 24615, *01 22.6.95                               736(95)                    1113(95)

Raîche c. Giard (Qué.), 24467, *02 9.3.95                                                      337(95)                    502(95)

Rarru v. The Queen (Crim.)(B.C.), 24881, *B                                                  1790(95)

Rarru v. The Queen (Crim.)(B.C.), 24865, *B                                                  1789(95)