Advanced Search

Syntax: "", OR, AND, EXACT(), /p, /s, /n
(YYYY or YYYY-MM or YYYY-MM-DD)
Sort by: Relevance Date

4,782 result(s)

  • 4,426.

    Dinner v. Humberstone - (1896) 26 SCR 252 - 1896-05-18

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Constitutional law

    William Humberstone (Plaintiff) Respondent. 1896: February 27, 28; 1896: May 18.

  • 4,427.

    Rennie v. Block - (1896) 26 SCR 356 - 1896-05-18

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Priorities and hypothecs

    Hugo Block and William Alexander (Defendants) Respondents. 1896: March 7, 9; 1896: May 18.

  • 4,428.

    Robertson v. Junkin - (1896) 26 SCR 192 - 1896-05-18

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Estates

    William J. Robertson, Executor of the Will of Samuel Junkin (Defendant) Appellant;

  • 4,429.

    The Queen v. Moss - (1896) 26 SCR 322 - 1896-05-18

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Constitutional law

    Crown is barred by the Nullum Tempus Act, 9 Greo. 3 ch. 16 (Imp.) Reg. v. McCormick[13]; Reg: v. Williams[14]; Attorney General v. The Midland Railway Co.[15].

  • 4,430.

    Charlebois v. Delap - (1896) 26 SCR 221 - 1896-03-28

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Commercial law

    This is so referred to by Vaughan Williams, J. in In re South American and Mexican Co.[26]

  • 4,431.

    The Northern Pacific Express Company v. Martin - (1896) 26 SCR 135 - 1896-03-24

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Commercial law

    William Martin and Others (Plaintiffs) Respondent. 1896: February 29; 1896: March 2; 1896: March 24.

  • 4,432.

    William Hamilton Manufacturing Co. v. Victoria Lumber & Manufacturing Co - (1896) 26 SCR 96 - 1896-03-24

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Contract

    William Hamilton Manufacturing Co. v. Victoria Lumber & Manufacturing Co, (1896) 26 SCR 96   [...]  William Hamilton Manufacturing Co. v. Victoria Lumber & Manufacturing Co, (1896) 26 S.C.R. 96   [...]  The William Hamilton Manufacturing Company (Plaintiffs) Appellants; and

  • 4,433.

    Wilson v. Land Security Co. - (1896) 26 SCR 149 - 1896-03-24

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Sale

    William D. Wilson (Defendant) Appellant; and The Land Security Company (Plaintiffs) Respondents.

  • 4,434.

    SCR | RCS (1896) vol 25 - 1896-03-04

    Canada Supreme Court Reports

    Upon the death of William Workman, A. M. deLisle and the executors of William Workman (Joel C. Baker, Robert Moat and John Moat) continued the business of the syndicate.   [...]  150 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA. [VOL: XXV. 1895 WILLIAM H. MERRITT (DEFENDANT)..   [...]  See remarks by Sir William Grant in Morice v. The Bishop of Durham (6).

  • 4,435.

    Agricultural Insurance Co. v. Sargeant - (1896) 26 SCR 29 - 1896-02-18

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Guarantee and suretyship

    The action was to recover the amount of a mortgage given by William Sargeant to secure $1,250, due by one J.H. Scriver up to 1st January, 1890, for arrears in his remittances of insurance premiums collected for the company.   [...]  One William Sargeant had been Scriver’s surety to a certain amount for the due payment by Scriver to the plaintiffs of the premiums received by him for them, and upon the 15th of the said month of October, for the purpose of securing payment of $1,250, part of the above debit, he executed the mortgage which is the subject

  • 4,436.

    Drysdale v. Dugas - (1896) 26 SCR 20 - 1896-02-18

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Property law

    WILLIAM DRYSDALE (DEFENDANT) Appellant; And C. A. DUGAS (PLAINTIFF)

  • 4,437.

    Mayhew v. Stone - (1896) 26 SCR 58 - 1896-02-18

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Estates

    Solicitor for the appellant: William S. Stewart. Solicitor for the respondent: Francis L. Haszard.

  • 4,438.

    Rooker v. Hoofstetter - (1896) 26 SCR 41 - 1896-02-18

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Priorities and hypothecs

    William H.A. Rooker (Defendant) Appellant; and Amelia Hoofstetter (Plaintiff) Respondent.   [...]  On the 30th day of December, 1886, William H. Christopher conveyed by way of mortgage the northwest ¼ of lot 16, in the 9th concession of the township of Storrington, to the respondent to secure the sum of $350 and interest.   [...]  This writing does not constitute an agreement to charge lot 19 within the statute of frauds, the party with whom it was made not being disclosed; William v. Jordan[2]; Williams v. Lake[3]; and there being no consideration; Agnew on the Statute of Frauds[4].

  • 4,439.

    St. Louis v.The Queen - (1896) 25 SCR 649 - 1896-02-18

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Evidence

    It was vigorously assailed as early as in 1806 by Sir William D. Evans, in his notes to Pothier's Obligations, vol. 2, pp. 169, 337, quoted with approbation by Mr. Best in his learned treatise on Evidence.   [...]  Williams and Coleridge JJ. concurred. The last case I have been able to collect is The Attorney General v. The Dean and Cartons of Windsor in 1858[66], the only English case quoted by the respondent.

  • 4,440.

    City of Vancouver v. Bailey - (1895) 25 SCR 62 - 1895-12-09

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Statutes

    William Bailey Respondent 1895: May 13; 1895: December 9. Present: Sir Henry Strong C.J., and Taschereau, Gwynne, Sedgewick and King JJ.

  • 4,441.

    Dominion Grange Mutual Fire Insurance Association v. Bradt - (1895) 25 SCR 154 - 1895-12-09

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Insurance

    Application of B. Barnes of the Township of West Williams to the Dominion Grange, Mutual Fire Insurance Association, for insurance against loss or damage by fire or lightning to the amount of $1,500 for four years from the 13th January, 1891, on the following property:

  • 4,442.

    Kerr v. The Atlantic & North West Railway Co. - (1895) 25 SCR 197 - 1895-12-09

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Civil procedure

    WILLIAM M. KERR AND OTHERS (PLAINTIFFS) Appellant; And THE ATLANTIC AND NORTH WEST RAILWAY COMPANY (DEFENDANTS)

  • 4,443.

    Law v. Hansen - (1895) 25 SCR 69 - 1895-12-09

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Action

    William Law and Others (Defendants) Appellant And Gustav Conrad Hansen (Plaintiff)

  • 4,444.

    Province of Ontario v. The Dominion of Canada and Province of Quebec. In re Indian Claims - (1895) 25 SCR 434 - 1895-12-09

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Constitutional law

    On the one side Her Majesty, Queen Victoria, represented by the Hon. William Robinson, Commissioner of Crown Lands, and on the other side certain tribes of Indians called in the treaty Nation Indians of Lake Huron, and Ojibeways of Lake Superior.   [...]  On the 7th September, 1850, the Hon. William B. Robinson, acting as a commissioner on behalf of the Crown, obtained from the Ojibeway Indians of the Lake Superior district a surrender in favour of the Crown of certain Indian territory, situate within the limits of the late province of Canada, as described in a treaty   [...]  The said William Benjamin Robinson on behalf of Her Majesty, who desires to deal liberally and justly with all her subjects, further promises and agrees that in case the territory hereby ceded by the parties of the second part shall at any future period produce such an amount as will enable the government of this province,

  • 4,445.

    Merritt v. Hepenstal - (1895) 25 SCR 150 - 1895-10-31

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Labour law

    William H. Merritt (Defendant) Appellant And Reginald F. D. Hepenstal (Plaintiff)

  • 4,446.

    Archbald v. Delisle / Baker v. Delisle / Mowat v. Delisle - (1895) 25 SCR 1 - 1895-06-26

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Civil procedure

    WILLIAM MOWAT et al. (INTERVENANTS) Appellants; AND M. NOLAN DELISLE et at (CONTESTANTS)   [...]  The business was managed by William Workman up to the time of his death in February, 1878.   [...]  Upon the death of William Workman, A. M. deLisle and the executors of William Workman (Joel C. Baker Robert Moat and John Moat) continued the business of the syndicate.

  • 4,447.

    Colchester South (Township) v. Valad - (1895) 24 SCR 622 - 1895-06-26

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Action

    On the merits the learned counsel referred to Corporation of Raleigh v. Williams[2]; Cowper Acton v. Essex[3]; Cripps on Compensation[4].   [...]  In the case of the latter, tested by the principle laid down by the Privy Council in Williams v. Raleigh[11] as to the distinction between compensation under the statute for lands injuriously affected and

  • 4,448.

    Donohoe v. Hull - (1895) 24 SCR 683 - 1895-06-26

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Family law

    Even supposing, said Vaughan Williams J., that the plaintiff had taken the proper steps to set aside the settlement as void, and had succeeded in doing so, even then Brown could never have been placed in the position of being obliged to pay over the money to Vyse ; the settlement would still be valid and subsisting between

  • 4,449.

    SCR | RCS (1895) vol 24 - 1895-06-26

    Canada Supreme Court Reports

    268 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA. [VOL. XXIV. 1894 WILLIAM R. WEBSTER el al.   [...]  Puekey (2) ; Williams v. Williams (3) ; Hellen v. Severs (4). The words " to hold in fee simple " cannot control the meaning of " issue " and make it a word of purchase.   [...]  The appellant William B. Shaw claims as a purchaser from the other appellants.

  • 4,450.

    Clinch v. Pernette - (1895) 24 SCR 385 - 1895-05-06

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Lease

    The appellant William B. Shaw claims as a purchaser from the other appellants.   [...]  In June, 1884, William B. Shaw, claiming as before mentioned took possession of the premises.   [...]  The defendant William B. Shaw pleaded the Nova Scotia Registry Act and also that he was a purchaser for valuable consideration without notice.