Advanced Search
- All Databases (4,782)
- Decisions (2,369)
- Resources (2,169)
4,782 result(s)
-
4,501.
Buck v. Knowlton - (1892) 21 SCR 371 - 1892-10-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
William G. Knowlton (Defendant) Respondent 1892: May 31; 1892: Oct. 10.
-
4,502.
Harris v. Robinson - (1892) 21 SCR 390 - 1892-10-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
title had not been registered; and secondly, that there appeared on the registry to be an annuity or rent charge which formed an incumbrance upon the lands having been granted by one Perry in favour of Sir William Campbell when Perry purchased from Campbell as part security for payment of the purchase money on that sale.
-
4,503.
Collins v. Cunningham / Cunningham v. Drysdale - (1892) 21 SCR 139 - 1892-06-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
On the 9th of August, 1888, Mr. Justice Townshend made an order that William McGribbon and David McGibbon, who were mortgage incumbrancers claiming as such under mortgages made by the heirs of Bernard O'Neil, or by some of them, should have leave to enter an appearance and becomes parties defendant in the action.
-
4,504.
Sydney and Louisburg Coal and Railway Co. v. Sword - (1892) 21 SCR 152 - 1892-06-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
The writ alleges that William Sword, the demandant's huband, was seized of these lands in his demesne as of fee during the coverture. [...] The provincial grant was void ab initio and consequently no seizin passed by it to the grantee William Sword, the demandant's husband. [...] The conveyance by William Sword to the Glasgow and Cape Breton Coal and Railway Company was what is technically termed an innocent conveyance, that is a conveyance not having any violent or tortious operation, such as a fine or feoffment formerly had; it follows that William Sword the grantor would not himself have been
-
4,505.
Williams v. Raleigh (Township) - (1892) 21 SCR 103 - 1892-06-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
Williams v. Raleigh (Township), (1892) 21 SCR 103 Supreme Court of Canada [...] Williams v. Raleigh (Township), (1892) 21 S.C.R. 103 Date: 1892-06-28 [...] Sarah Ann Williams and Charles A. Williams (Plaintiffs) Appellants; and
-
4,506.
Corporation of the Township of Sombra v. Corporation of the Township of Chatham - (1892) 21 SCR 305 - 1892-06-18
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
townships, or independently, one William Whitebread and others, inhabitants of the gore of Chatham, in or about the month of September, 1880, petitioned the council of the township of Chatham for a drain to be dug along the northerly side of the road between the gore of Chatham and the township of Sombra to extend from
-
4,507.
The Ayr American Plough Co. v. Wallace - (1892) 21 SCR 256 - 1892-05-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
William B. Wallace (Defendant) Respondent 1892: May 16. Present:—Sir W. J. Ritchie C.J. and Strong, Taschereau, Gwynne and Patterson JJ.
-
4,508.
SCR | RCS (1892) vol 20 - 1892-05-09
Canada Supreme Court ReportsThe plaintiffs are the executors of the late William Moody, of Côte St. Antoine. [...] See also Williams v. The Colonia, Bank (3). (1) L.R. 1 Q.B. 585. (4) 9 ed., s. 324. [...] May 16th—No. 106.--WILLIAM SAMPSON—Pavilion Mountain MARTLEY v. —200 inches.
-
4,509.
Duggan v. London & Canadian Loan Co. - (1892) 20 SCR 481 - 1892-05-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsSecurities
See Cole v. The North-western Bank[4]; Williams v. The Colonial Bank[5]. [...] See also Williams v. The Colonia Bank5. [Page 484] As to the intention of the parties in the transaction between Duggan and Scarth & Cochran see Bradford Banking Co. v. Briggs[10]. [...] See Williams v. The Colonial Bank[16] and City Bank v. Barrow[17]. The respondents took shares without notice and the appellant must show some equitable ground upon which they should be re-transferred.
-
4,510.
McMicken v. The Ontario Bank - (1892) 20 SCR 548 - 1892-05-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsEvidence
Margaret S. McMicken, By William B. Scarth, her Next Friend (Plaintiff) [...] Being asked who were present at the time she signed the deed, she answered—“The late William Ross, George Brown, my husband and myself, and I think my father-in-law, though I am not sure as to him.”
-
4,511.
SCR | RCS (1892) vol 19 - 1892-05-02
Canada Supreme Court Reports— v. Williams . Renaud, ex parte . Reuter-v. Electric Telegraph Co. Reward; The . [...] VOL. XIX.] SUPREME COURT OF CANADA. 159 EDWARD WILLIAMS AND ALICE 1890 S. WILLIAMS, HIS WIFE (PLAIN- APPELLANTS ; *Oct 3 1. [...] Reg. y. Williams (12) ; The Queen v. Guinness (13). (1) R.S.O. (1887) c. 193, s. 7.
-
4,512.
The Municipality of Lunenburg v. The Attorney-General of Nova Scotia - (1892) 20 SCR 596 - 1892-05-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
The Warden and Council of the Municipality of Lunenburg, William H. DeLong and others (Defendants)
-
4,513.
Utterson Lumber Co. v. Rennie - (1892) 21 SCR 218 - 1892-05-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
William A. Mitchell, John W. Lang, William W. Park, James Todhunter and Thomas H. Steele, all creditors of the insolvents, became the purchasers of the insolvents’ real estate and other property for the price of $16,050.
-
4,514.
McDonald v. McDonald - (1892) 21 SCR 201 - 1892-04-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
Then he divided the rear one hundred acres, namely, east half of 18 in the 7th between his sons William and Alexander, giving William the east half and the defendant Alexander the west half, the fifty acres in question. [...] the 300 acres to his brother William for the expressed consideration of $2,000, out of which William was to pay the mortgage to the bank which was done, but William afterwards got into difficulties and the land was again sold by the sheriff under execution against William’s lands and was bought by the plaintiff for $599. [...] Nor is it disputed that after the conveyance of the land by the plaintiff to his brother William in 1853, and
-
4,515.
Miller v. Duggan - (1892) 21 SCR 33 - 1892-04-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
William Miller and Robert Miller (Plaintiffs) Appellants And Johanna Duggan, Patrick M. Duggan, and Charles Cogswell (Defendants) [...] Goff v. Lister[25]; Bethune v. Caulcutt[26]; Graham v. Chalmers[27]; Rice v. O'Connor[28]; Farrow v. Rees[29]; and Jones v. Williams[30] are all authorities to this effect.
-
4,516.
North Perth Election Case (Campbell v. Grieve) - (1892) 20 SCR 331 - 1892-04-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsWilliam Gowing was a voter who voted in Listowel, who, at the date of the election lived in Stratford. [...] have been treated by John Duggan and William Daly, alleged agents of the respondent. [...] The voter, William Gowing, was a bricklayer living in Stratford and having a vote at Listowel.
-
4,517.
The Accident Ins. Co. of North America v. Young - (1892) 20 SCR 280 - 1892-04-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
The action was brought to recover from the defendants the sum of $5000 under and by virtue of a certain policy of insurance issued by the said defendants insuring one William Wilson, against death by accident. [...] That both before and after the said accident the said William Wilson had used all due diligence for his personal safety, protection and preservation, and had. in every way complied with the clauses and conditions of the said policy of insurance» and his said accident and subsequent death were covered by the said policy; [...] That the death of the said William Wilson occurred on the thirteenth day of April, one thousand eight hundred and eighty-six. as alleged in the plaintiff 's declaration, but the said plaintiff wholly failed and neglected to notify the said defendants as required by the said above recited condition until long after the death
-
4,518.
Welland Election Case (German v. Rothery) - (1892) 20 SCR 376 - 1892-04-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsElections
William Manly German (Respondent) Appellant And Jesse Calhoun Rothery (Petitioner)
-
4,519.
Ashdown v. The Manitoba Free Press Company - (1891) 20 SCR 43 - 1891-11-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Robinson Q.C. for the respondents cited, as to the contention that the statute should have been pleaded, Williams v. The East India Co. ([5]); Sissons v. Dixon ([6]); and as to the declaration being sufficient, Moyer v. Davidson ([7]); De Forrest v. Bunnell ([8]); Mowat v. Clement ([9]). [...] appear to me material, inasmuch as either swearing or affirming would be a compliance with the statute, though I should, if it were necessary to determine this point, certainly be prepared to hold that the contents ‘of the document which states that “ I, William F. Luxton, &c., do solemnly declare and affirm that,” [...] I, William Fisher Luxton, of the city of Winnipeg, in the county of Selkirk, journalist, do solemnly declare and affirm:
-
4,520.
Benning v. The Atlantic & N.W. Ry Co. - (1891) 20 SCR 177 - 1891-11-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsExpropriation
The "plaintiffs are the executors of the late "William Moody, of Côte St. Antoine.
-
4,521.
Lakefield Lumber and Manufacturing Co. v. Shairp - (1891) 19 SCR 657 - 1891-11-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsState
William Shairp (Plaintiff) Respondent. 1891: February 4, 5; 1891: November 17.
-
4,522.
Petry v. La Caisse d'Économie de Notre Dame de Québec - (1891) 19 SCR 713 - 1891-11-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsFinancial institutions
On the 16th March, 1886, Petry, who had then become insolvent, and was indebted to the respondents in a sum of $9,400 paid them by a cheque of the Rev. George Henry Parker, curator to the substitution created by the will of the late William Petry, and drawn on the funds of the estate, a sum of $6000 and on the same day or [...] Nearly three years after this settlement had taken place, the Rev. George Henry Parker, in his capacity of curator to the substitution created by the last will and testament of the late William Petry Gertrude Petry, his wife, and the Rev. Henry James Petry, two of the three surviving children of the late William Petry [...] It was admitted that out of the $9,400 paid by Parker $768 were due by the estate William Petry and that it is only the difference of $8632 claimed by the action which was paid by error.
-
4,523.
Queen's County, P.E.I., Election Case (Davies v. Hennessy) & Prince County, P.E.I., Election Case (Perry v. Cameron) - (1891) 20 SCR 26 - 1891-11-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsElections
Louis H. Davies and William Welsh (Respondents) Appellants; and William Hennessy (Petitioner) Respondent; [...] Henry Davies and William Welsh at said election as members for the House of Commons for said electoral district. [...] (Signed) WILLIAM HENNESSY. To Louis Henry Davies and William Welsh.
-
4,524.
Stanstead Election Case (Rider v. Snow) - (1891) 20 SCR 12 - 1891-11-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsElections
Solicitor for respondent : William White. [1] 8 Can. S. C. R. 169.
-
4,525.
Bernardin v. The Municipality of North Dufferin - (1891) 19 SCR 581 - 1891-11-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
desirable, had not treated the rule as being finally settled by the decision of the Court of Error and Appeal they would when re-enacting the law have acted on the suggestions thrown out by Chancellor Blake in Pim’s case, and before that by Sir William Richards in Marshall v. School Trustees of Killey ([134]), and have