Advanced Search
- All Databases (4,782)
- Decisions (2,369)
- Resources (2,169)
4,782 result(s)
-
3,076.
Major v. Canadian Pacific Railway - (1922) 64 SCR 367 - 1922-06-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
William J. Major (Plaintiff) Appellant; and The Canadian Pacific Railway Company (Defendant) Respondent.
-
3,077.
Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Mitten - (1919) 59 SCR 118 - 1919-10-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
William J. Mitten. The learned trial judge, who decided in favour of the respondents, and whose judgment was affirmed by
-
3,078.
Olmstead v. The King - (1916) 53 SCR 450 - 1916-06-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsPublic utilities
Howard Herbert Victor Olmstead and William Atchison Olmstead (Suppliants) Appellants;
-
3,079.
McNeil v. Fultz - (1906) 38 SCR 198 - 1906-12-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
William S. Fultz and Patrick E. Corbett (Plaintiffs) Respondents. 1906: December 14 & 26.
-
3,080.
Langley v. Kahnert - (1905) 36 SCR 397 - 1905-06-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
The learned trial judge, Sir William Meredith, stated in his judgment the facts upon which the questions raised here are to be disposed of:
-
3,081.
Ross v. The King - (1902) 32 SCR 532 - 1902-10-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsCustoms and excise
James Ross and William Mackenzie(Suppliants) Appellants And His Majesty The King (Respondent)
-
3,082.
Hawley v. Wright - (1902) 32 SCR 40 - 1902-02-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
William H. Hawley, Administrator of the Estate of Murdoch L. Hawley, Deceased (Plaintiff)
-
3,083.
Price v. LeBlond - (1900) 30 SCR 539 - 1900-10-08
Supreme Court JudgmentsLease
WILLIAM PRICE AND AMOS COLSTON, EXECUTORS OF THE LATE EVAN JOHN PRICE (PLAINTIFFS)
-
3,084.
Michaels v. Michaels - (1900) 30 SCR 547 - 1900-10-08
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
See Williams on Executors (9 ed.) pp. 739 and 798; also [Page 458] Fleet v. Perrins[1], per Blackburn J. at p. 541-2,(1868), decided before the earliest Married Woman's Property Act; Datton y. Midland Counties Railway Co.[2]; Gates v. Madeley[3], per Parke B. at page 427; Richards v. Richards[4]; Sherrington v. Yates[5];
-
3,085.
Parsons et al. v. Hart - (1900) 30 SCR 473 - 1900-06-12
Supreme Court JudgmentsCivil law
WILLIAM A. PICK, Master. The declaration of the respondent contained the following statements :
-
3,086.
Black et al. v. The Queen - (1899) 29 SCR 693 - 1899-10-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsGuarantee and suretyship
The form of this bond is not known to Quebec law, but it is sufficient under the statutes and it was by these statutes that the parties intended themselves to be bound; see Lafleur on Conflict of Laws, p. 149; Hamlyn v. Talisker Distillery[19]; and Colonial Bank V. Cady & Williams[20].
-
3,087.
Norwich Union Fire Ins. Co. v. LeBell - (1899) 29 SCR 470 - 1899-05-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
Williams Personal Property (10 ed.) pp. 8 and 37. Lingley v. Queen Ins. Co.[19].
-
3,088.
Drysdale v. Dugas - (1896) 26 SCR 20 - 1896-02-18
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
WILLIAM DRYSDALE (DEFENDANT) Appellant; And C. A. DUGAS (PLAINTIFF)
-
3,089.
Webster v. Foley - (1892) 21 SCR 580 - 1892-12-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
Solicitor for respondents : Adolphus Williams. [1] 2 B.C. Rep. 137.
-
3,090.
Buck v. Knowlton - (1892) 21 SCR 371 - 1892-10-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
William G. Knowlton (Defendant) Respondent 1892: May 31; 1892: Oct. 10.
-
3,091.
The Municipality of Lunenburg v. The Attorney-General of Nova Scotia - (1892) 20 SCR 596 - 1892-05-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
The Warden and Council of the Municipality of Lunenburg, William H. DeLong and others (Defendants)
-
3,092.
Merchants' Despatch Transportation Co. v. Hately - (1887) 14 SCR 572 - 1887-03-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
The bills of lading were signed by “William Brown, agent severally but not jointly,” and endorsed by Hately and the consignees.
-
3,093.
Logan v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. - (1886) 13 SCR 270 - 1886-05-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
William Logan (Plaintiff) Appellant And This Commercial Union Insurance Company (Defendants)
-
3,094.
Oakes v. The City of Halifax - (1879) 4 SCR 640 - 1879-10-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsCivil procedure
Solicitor for respondents: William Sutherland.
-
3,095.
Part 1, 2020 Vol. 2 ([2020] 2 SCR 3-281) - 2020-06-26
Canada Supreme Court ReportsHorton, William G. “A Brief History of Arbitration” (2017), 47 Adv. Q. 12. [...] Horton, William G. « A Brief History of Arbitration » (2017), 47 Adv. Q. 12. [...] Williams c. Walker-T homas Furniture Company, 350 F.2d 445 (1965), p. 449-450).
-
3,096.
Bulletin of October 26, 2018 - 2018-10-26
BulletinsWilliams Litigation Laywers FILING DATE: 07.09.2018 Nicola Piazza [...] Landon Williams Owen Goddard Goddard Nasseri LLP v. (38304) Her Majesty the Queen (Ont.) [...] Ivan William Mervin Henry c. Sa Majesté la Reine du chef de la Colombie-Britannique, représentée par le procureur général de la Colombie-Britannique
-
3,097.
Bulletin of June 15, 2018 - 2018-06-15
BulletinsWilliam J. Sammon and Amanda M. Estabrooks, for the intervener the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops. [...] William J. Sammon et Amanda M. Estabrooks, pour l’intervenante la Conférence des évêques catholiques du Canada. [...] William J. Sammon and Amanda M. Estabrooks, for the intervener the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops.
-
3,098.
Bulletin of March 8, 2013 - 2013-03-08
Bulletins2. Mimi Williams v. Telecommunications Workers Union et al. (Alta.) [...] Leonard F. Marsello, Malliha Wilson, Shona L. Compton and William R. MacLarkey, for the respondent. [...] Leonard F. Marsello, Malliha Wilson, Shona L. Compton et William R. MacLarkey, pour l’intimée.
-
3,099.
Bulletin of October 26, 2012 - 2012-10-26
BulletinsWilliam W. Shores, c.r., et Fiona Vance, pour l’intervenant O. Brian Fjeldheim (Chief Electoral Officer of Alberta). [...] Malliha Wilson, Leonard F. Marsello, William R. MacLarkey and Shona L. Compton for the respondent [...] Malliha Wilson, Leonard F. Marsello, William R. MacLarkey et Shona L. Compton pour l’intimée
-
3,100.
Bulletin of December 24, 2010 - 2010-12-24
BulletinsWilliam Russell Stephens William Russell Stephens v. (33964) Her Majesty the Queen (Ont.) [...] Matthew G. Williams, for the appellant. Christopher M. Rupar, Alain Préfontaine and Bernard Letarte, for the respondents. [...] Matthew G. Williams, pour l’appelante. Christopher M. Rupar, Alain Préfontaine et Bernard Letarte, pour les intimés.