Advanced Search
- All Databases (4,782)
- Decisions (2,369)
- Resources (2,169)
4,782 result(s)
-
3,451.
North American Life Assurance Co. v. Elson - (1903) 33 SCR 383 - 1903-04-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
By the terms of the application the contract commenced from the delivery of the policy and the policy was sent by the appellant's letter dated 27th September, 1894, to William McBride at Winnipeg, agent of the appellant, for delivery to Elson in British Columbia.
-
3,452.
Kent v. Ellis - (1900) 31 SCR 110 - 1900-12-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsCivil procedure
This court will not interfere with a decision such as is now appealed from as it is upon a mere question of procedure; Dawson v. Union Bank[13]; Gladwin v. Cummings[14]; Ferrier v. Trépannier[15]; Scammell v. James[16]; Williams v. Leonard & Sons[17].
-
3,453.
Grand Trunk Railway Co. of Canada v. Anderson - (1898) 28 SCR 541 - 1898-06-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
On the 8th of February, 1895, one William McKenzie purchased from the railway company a return-ticket from the Village of Ailsa Craig, a station on the main line of the Grand Trunk Railway, to the City of London.
-
3,454.
Powell v. Watters - (1897) 28 SCR 133 - 1897-12-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
WILLIAM F. POWELL (DEFENDANT) Appellant; And THOMAS J WATTERS (PLAINTIFF)
-
3,455.
Niagara District Fruit Growers Stock Co. v. Walker - (1896) 26 SCR 629 - 1896-12-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsGuarantee and suretyship
But I do think that the contract of suretyship is, as expressed by Lord Westbury in Williams v. Bayley12, one which “should be based upon the free and voluntary agency of the individual who enters into it.”
-
3,456.
The Queen v. Moss - (1896) 26 SCR 322 - 1896-05-18
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Crown is barred by the Nullum Tempus Act, 9 Greo. 3 ch. 16 (Imp.) Reg. v. McCormick[13]; Reg: v. Williams[14]; Attorney General v. The Midland Railway Co.[15].
-
3,457.
Trent Valley Woollen Manufacturing Co. v. Oelrichs & Co. - (1894) 23 SCR 682 - 1894-10-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
Solicitors for the appellants: Clute & William. Solicitors for the respondents: McCarthy, Osler, Hoskin & Creelman.
-
3,458.
Scott v. The Bank of New Brunswick - (1893) 23 SCR 277 - 1893-02-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsAgency
McLeod Q.C. and Palmer Q.C. for the appellant, referred to Williams v. The Colonial Bank[3]; Barton v. London and North-western Railway Co.[4]; Jones v. Broad hurst[5].
-
3,459.
The Great Eastern Railway v. Lambe - (1892) 21 SCR 431 - 1892-11-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsCivil procedure
WILLIAM B. LAMBE, èsqual. (PLAINTIFF) Respondent. 1892: Oct 10; 1892 Nov 2
-
3,460.
Collins v. Cunningham / Cunningham v. Drysdale - (1892) 21 SCR 139 - 1892-06-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
On the 9th of August, 1888, Mr. Justice Townshend made an order that William McGribbon and David McGibbon, who were mortgage incumbrancers claiming as such under mortgages made by the heirs of Bernard O'Neil, or by some of them, should have leave to enter an appearance and becomes parties defendant in the action.
-
3,461.
Stanstead Election Case (Rider v. Snow) - (1891) 20 SCR 12 - 1891-11-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsElections
Solicitor for respondent : William White. [1] 8 Can. S. C. R. 169.
-
3,462.
Wheeler v. Black - (1887) 14 SCR 242 - 1887-03-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
WILLIAM W.WHEELER, et al Appellant And JOHN BLACK et al., Respondent.
-
3,463.
Long v. Hancock - (1885) 12 SCR 532 - 1885-11-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
William D. Long and George H. Bisby (Plaintiffs) Appellants; and Edward H. Hancock, J.B. Fairgrieve and John Hallam (Defendants) Respondents.
-
3,464.
Mackenzie v. Champion - (1885) 12 SCR 649 - 1885-06-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsAgency
William L Mackenzie and Arthur B. Lee (Plaintiffs) Appellants And
-
3,465.
Sovereign Fire Ins. Co. v. Peters - (1886) 12 SCR 33 - 1885-03-08
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
That the said plaintiff and the said John Peters and Thomas F. Sutherland, or William Peters, junior, at the time of making said chattel mortgage or said trust deed, had not, nor had any of them, read over the conditions of said policy, and none of said parties intended to commit a breach of any of the conditions of said
-
3,466.
Jonas v. Gilbert - (1881) 5 SCR 356 - 1881-02-11
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
William Sandall, as Chamberlain of the City of Saint John, New Brunswick, made a complaint to Humphrey T. Gilbert, the Police Magistrate of the City of Saint John, that Henri Jonas, who was not a free citizen of the said City or a registered freeman, or paying rates or taxes in the said City, did, at the City of Saint John,
-
3,467.
SCR | RCS (1902) vol 31 - 1902-01-01
Canada Supreme Court Reports• Foley v. East Flamborough Folkard v. Metropolitan Railway Co. Ford v. Lacy v. Williams . [...] Ker v. Williams . Kerby v. Ross. • Kerr v. Davis . Kidney v. Coussmaker . . [...] Ker v. Williams (1) ; United Telephone Co. v. Tasker (2) ; Lancaster v. Moss (3).
-
3,468.
SCR | RCS [1955] - 1955-11-15
Canada Supreme Court ReportsC. L. Dubin, Q.C. and William Schreiber, Q.C. for the appellants. G. N. Shaver, Q.C. for the respondent. [...] In the course of his judgment at p. 473, Vaughan Williams L.J., said: ... [...] A. R. Williams Machinery Co. Ltd. v. Moore (2). (1) (1920) 61 Can. S.C.R. 143.
-
3,469.
SCR | RCS [1998] vol 3 - 1998-12-17
Canada Supreme Court ReportsShakespeare, William. Julius Ccesar. The Arden Edition of the Works of William Shakespeare. [...] Shakespeare, William. Jules César. Œuvres de William Shakespeare. Traduit par F.-V. Hugo. [...] Œuvres de William Shakespeare. Traduit de Cluny, 1938 Shakespeare, William.
-
3,470.
SCR | RCS [1994] vol 2 - 1994-09-15
Canada Supreme Court ReportsBy William James Byrne and Andrew Dewar Gibb. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1928. [...] In these circumstances, [1994] 2 S.C.R. Daniel Boersma et Ronae William. [...] London: Stevens & Sons Ltd., 1961 Williams, Glanville. "Intents in the Alternative" (1991), 50 Williams, Glanville.
-
3,471.
SCR | RCS (1922) vol 63 - 1922-05-31
Canada Supreme Court ReportsGrand Trunk Pacific Ry. Co. v. Fort} William Land Investment Co....... [...] VOL. LXIII. SUPREME COURT OF CANADA. 201 Williams, Executors, p. 213; and such acts will stand iV good though the executor die without proving the JAMIESON V. will. [...] During the proceedings, and before the filing of a plea, the company was placed in liquidation and William J. Henderson was appointed its liquidator.
-
3,472.
Bulletin of May 12, 2023 - 2023-05-12
BulletinsRodney Byron Williams Antila, Crystal Smith Corona Van Dongen & Cook [...] The Crown’s case was circumstantial and in part relied on evidence of Mr. Williams, an unsavoury witness whose testimony required a vetrovec warning. [...] Le dossier de la Couronne reposait sur des preuves circonstancielles, et en partie sur le témoignage de M. Williams, un témoin dont l’honnêteté était douteuse et dont le témoignage nécessitait une mise en garde de type Vetrovec.
-
3,473.
R. v. Friesen - 2020 SCC 9 - [2020] 1 SCR 424 - 2020-04-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
2009 ONCA 133, 95 O.R. (3d) 173; R. v. Sanatkar (1981), 64 C.C.C. (2d) 325; R. v. Bergeron, 2013 QCCA 7; R. v. Proulx, 2000 SCC 5, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 61; R. v. Gardiner, [1982] 2 S.C.R. 368; R. v. Régnier, 2018 QCCA 306; R. v. Vautour, 2016 BCCA 497; R. v. Williams, 2019 BCCA 295; R. v. Vokey, 2000 NFCA 14, 186 Nfld. [...] For instance, the British Columbia Court of Appeal has set a range for sexual interference of one to three years and has suggested that only in “rare circumstances” would a sentence above three years be justified (R. v. Williams, 2019 BCCA 295, at para. 71 (CanLII)). [...] The British Columbia Court of Appeal appears to have done this by setting a range of two to six years for “sexual assault involving intercourse” in cases involving child victims while setting a range of one to three years for sexual interference (see Scofield, at para. 59; Williams, at para. 71).
-
3,474.
Bulletin of June 29, 2001 - 2001-06-29
BulletinsWilliam F. Ehrcke, Q.C. A.G. of British Columbia FILING DATE 18.6.2001 [...] William F. Ehrcke, Q.C., and Mary Ainslie, for the intervener the Attorney General of British Columbia. [...] William F. Ehrcke, c.r. et Mary Ainslie, pour l’intervenant le procureur général de la Colombie‑Britannique.
-
3,475.
Bulletin of September 25, 1998 - 1998-09-25
Bulletins26480 WILLIAM O’MALLEY - v. - HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN (Crim.)(B.C.) CORAM: The Chief Justice and McLachlin and Iacobucci JJ. [...] William F. Ehrcke, Q.C., for the appellant. Douglas J. Stewart and Todd A. McKendrick, for the respondent. [...] William F. Ehrcke, c.r., pour l’appelante. Douglas J. Stewart et Todd A. McKendrick, pour l’intimé.