Advanced Search
- All Databases (4,782)
- Decisions (2,369)
- Resources (2,169)
4,782 result(s)
-
3,901.
SCR | RCS [2000] vol 1 - 2000-07-20
Canada Supreme Court ReportsAs stated in Williams, at p. 424: Does the fact that Williams, the victim, was an adult dis-tinguish this case? [...] Comme on le dit dans Williams, à la p. 424: [TRADUCTION] Le fait que la victime, Williams, était un adulte établit-il une distinction en l'espèce? [...] This leaves the defendant with two alternatives discussed in Williams, supra.
-
3,902.
SCR | RCS [1992] vol 1 - 1992-06-04
Canada Supreme Court ReportsBlackstone, Sir William. Commentaries on the Laws of England, vol. 4. [...] [1992] 1 R.C.S. WILLIAMS C. Glenn Williams Appellant v. a Her Majesty The Queen Respondent INDEXED AS: WILLIAMS V. CANADA File No.: 22116. b 1991: October 10; 1992: April 16. [...] CANADA 877 Glenn Williams Appelant c. Sa Majesté la Reine Intimée RÉPERTORIÉ: WILLIAMS C. CANADA No du greffe: 22116. 1991: 10 octobre; 1992: 16 avril.
-
3,903.
Bulletin of June 24, 2022 - 2022-06-24
BulletinsMcDowell, William C. Lenczner Slaght LLP v. (40154) Blackmore Management Inc., et al.
-
3,904.
Royal Bank of Canada v. Trang - 2016 SCC 50 - [2016] 2 SCR 412 - 2016-11-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsCharnetski, William, Patrick Flaherty and Jeremy Robinson. The Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act : A Comprehensive Guide.
-
3,905.
R. v. Tran - 2010 SCC 58 - [2010] 3 SCR 350 - 2010-11-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
In other words, the accused must have killed because he was provoked and not because the provocation existed (R. v. Faid, [1983] 1 S.C.R. 265, at p. 277, citing Professor G. L. Williams in his Textbook of Criminal Law (1978), at p. 480).
-
3,906.
Bulletin of July 3, 2009 - 2009-07-03
BulletinsWilliams, McEnery FILING DATE: 15.06.2009 Susan Vanderploeg Denis I. Quon
-
3,907.
Bulletin of August 18, 2006 - 2006-08-18
Bulletins31037 William Charles Rath v. United States of America, Her Majesty the Queen, Irwin Cotler, Minister of Justice (Ont.) (Criminal) (By Leave)
-
3,908.
Boucher v. Stelco Inc. - 2005 SCC 64 - [2005] 3 SCR 279 - 2005-11-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsCivil procedure
International law
Pensions
Mercer Pension Manual, vol. 1, by William M. Mercer Limited. Agincourt, Ont.: Carswell, 1988 (loose-leaf updated 2005, release 4).
-
3,909.
Bulletin of December 3, 2004 - 2004-12-03
BulletinsWilliam M. Holburn, Q.C. Alexander, Holburn, Beaudin & Lang v. (30633)
-
3,910.
Bulletin of May 17, 2002 - 2002-05-17
Bulletins26980 Robert William Latimer ‑ v. ‑ Her Majesty the Queen ‑ and ‑ Canadian AIDS Society, The Evangelical Fellowship of Canada, Christian Medical Dental Society, Physicians for life, Canadian Civil Liberties Association, Council of Canadians with disabilities, Saskatchewan voice of people with disabilities, Canadian
-
3,911.
Ward v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2002 SCC 17 - [2002] 1 SCR 569 - 2002-02-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Lederman, William R. Continuing Canadian Constitutional Dilemmas: Essays on the Constitutional History, Public Law and Federal System of Canada.
-
3,912.
Bulletin of November 15, 1996 - 1996-11-15
Bulletins(Southin, Finch, and Williams JJ.A.) Appeal allowed September 19, 1996
-
3,913.
R. v. Felawka - [1993] 4 SCR 199 - 1993-10-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
William F. Ehrcke, for the respondent. The reasons of Lamer C.J. and Sopinka J. were delivered by
-
3,914.
Royal Trust v. Potash - [1986] 2 SCR 351 - 1986-10-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
William P. Riley, Q.C., and Reuben Z. Potash, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered by
-
3,915.
Ogg-Moss v. R. - [1984] 2 SCR 173 - 1984-09-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
William Ogg-Moss (Plaintiff) Appellant; and Her Majesty The Queen (Defendant) Respondent.
-
3,916.
Paskivski v. Canadian Pacific Ltd. - [1976] 1 SCR 687 - 1975-04-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Canadian Pacific Limited (formerly known as Canadian Pacific Railway Company), Wilfred Cook, Charles Marsden, William Pederson and Nestor Stanko (Defendants) Respondents;
-
3,917.
Henwood v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America - [1967] SCR 720 - 1967-10-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
One William Clark, an agent for the respondent insurance company, had issued certain policies in connection with the appellant’s family and called at the house on frequent occasions to collect premiums.
-
3,918.
Guaranty Trust Company of Canada v. Minister of National Revenue - [1967] SCR 133 - 1966-12-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
Solicitors for the appellant: McMaster, Steele, McKinnon, MacKenzie & Collins-Williams, Toronto.
-
3,919.
Labour Relations Board v. Traders' Service Ltd. - [1958] SCR 672 - 1958-10-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
Solicitors for the appellants Attorney-General of British Columbia and the Board: Paine, Edmonds, Mercer & Williams, Vancouver.
-
3,920.
Bouck v. Minister of National Revenue - [1952] 2 SCR 17 - 1952-03-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
Here, to adapt the language of Sir William Meredith, at page 611 of 33 O.L.R., the appellant was entitled to receive the income, subject to an obligation on her part to maintain and educate the children out of it but leaving to her discretion the manner in and the extent to which provision should be made for any child, a
-
3,921.
Asconi Building Corporation and Vermette v. Vocisano - [1947] SCR 358 - 1947-03-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsStatutes
Then, in Lloyd v. Williams 11, Blackstone J. is reported to have conceived that interest may as lawfully be received before-hand for forbearing as after the term is expired for having forborne.
-
3,922.
Spun Rock Wools Ltd. v. Fiberglas Canada Ltd. - [1943] SCR 547 - 1943-10-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsIntellectual property
Solicitor for the appellant: William A. MacRae. Solicitors for the (plaintiffs) respondents: Smart & Biggar.
-
3,923.
Governor and Company of Adventurers of England Trading into Hudson's Bay v. Wyrzykowski - [1938] SCR 278 - 1938-04-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
E. K. Williams K.C. for the respondent. [Page 282] The Chief Justice.—I concur in the conclusion as well as in the reasoning of my brother Hudson as well as those of my brother Davis, but I desire to add one or two observations upon the points raised as to the admissibility of the permits and of the report of the inspector
-
3,924.
Clark v. The King - (1921) 61 SCR 608 - 1921-03-11
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
As against these observations may be put the language of Tindal C. J. in addressing the jury in McNaughton's Case[27], where he presided with Williams J. and Coleridge J. The learned Chief Justice used these words:—
-
3,925.
Toronto Suburban Rway. Co. v. Everson - (1917) 54 SCR 395 - 1917-02-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsExpropriation
The appellants’ railway is not to be constructed upon a public highway, as was the case in Grand Trunk Pacific Railway Co. v. Fort William Land Investment Co.[40], referred to by Mr. Henderson.