Advanced Search
- All Databases (2,511)
- Decisions (1,094)
- Resources (1,417)
2,511 result(s)
-
2,301.
SCR | RCS (1910) vol 42 - 1910-03-04
Canada Supreme Court ReportsThis was a general fund that the Province of Can-ada took over from the Imperial Government and that fund at Confederation, as you will see by the evidence of Mr. Scott, went to the Dominion and was not confined, as I submit, to the establishment of schools for Indians in any particular province. [...] W. L. Scott supported the motion. Trueman contra. *PRESENT: Sir Charles Fitzpatrick C.J. and Girouard, Davies, Idington, Duff and Anglin JJ. (1) 18 Man. R. 493. [...] APPEAL from the judgment of the Supreme Court of Alberta (1), affirming the judgment of Scott J., at the trial (2) , which dismissed the plaintiff's action with costs.
-
2,302.
Cunard v. The King - (1910) 43 SCR 88 - 1910-02-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsExpropriation
[9] 4 M. & Gr. 995; 5 Scott N.R. 689. [10] 7 Moo. P.C. 77. [11] 9 Can. S.C.R. 239.
-
2,303.
Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. City of Toronto - (1910) 42 SCR 613 - 1910-02-15
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
and that from the point of junction of the Canadian Pacific Railway Company and the Grand Trunk elevated tracks at or near Berkeley Street to Scott Street, the centre line of the viaduct shall be located on the southerly boundary of the Esplanade, except at the curve in the tracks in the vicinity of West Market Street.
-
2,304.
Svensson v. Bateman - (1909) 42 SCR 146 - 1909-05-11
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
W. L. Scott supported the motion. Trueman contra. [Page 147] The Chief Justice.—This appeal is quashed with costs fixed at $50. [...] Taylor's Case[10], per Lord Eldon; Re Courtney[11]; Dougall v. Yager[12]; Hobbs v. Scott[13], per Draper C.J.; Lemon v. Lemon[14], per Strong V.C.; Graham v. Delvin[15], per Boyd C; Ross v. Van Etten[16], at page 600, per Taylor C.J. The rule 755 is thus but the necessary complement of rule 748; and a proceeding under it is
-
2,305.
SCR | RCS (1909) vol 41 - 1909-05-07
Canada Supreme Court Reports[1906] A.C. 110 588 Scott & Horton v. Godfrey [1901] 2 K.B. 726 626 Seeley, In re 13 Can. Cr. Cas. 259 6 Shallow v. Gazette Printing Co... [...] Ewart K.C. for the Grand Trunk Railway Co. W. L. Scott for the Canadian Pacific Railway Co. The CHIEF JUSTICE and DTJFF and ANGLIN JJ. Concurred in the judgment of Mr. Justice Davies. [...] Anderson & Co. v. Beard (8); Levitt v. Hamblet (9) ; Ponsolle v. Webber (10) ; Scott & Horton (1) 10 A. & E. 27, at p. 30.
-
2,306.
Butler v. Murphy & Co. - (1909) 41 SCR 618 - 1909-05-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsAgency
Anderson & Co. v. Beard[34]; Levitt v. Hamblet[35]; Ponsolle v. Webber[36]; Scott & Norton [...] W. Scott, Pro manager. The appellant denies that he ever received slip referred to, and it is not proven that any such slip was ever put in the letter.
-
2,307.
County of Carleton v. City Ottawa - (1909) 41 SCR 552 - 1909-04-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
W. L. Scott for the Canadian Pacific Railway Co. The Chief Justice and Duff and Anglin JJ. concurred in the judgment of Mr. Justice Davies.
-
2,308.
Peters v. Perras - (1909) 42 SCR 244 - 1909-04-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsAction
APPEAL from the judgment of the Supreme Court of Alberta[1], affirming the judgment of Scott J., at the trial[2], which dismissed the plaintiff's action with costs. [...] At the trial Scott J. dismissed the action, holding that the makers were not liable, that the note, on its face, shewed that interest thereon was overdue at the time of the transfer, and, consequently, that the transferee was put upon inquiry before purchasing it, and that, this circumstance, coupled with other suspicious
-
2,309.
Province of Ontario v. Dominion of Canada - (1909) 42 SCR 1 - 1909-02-12
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
This was a general fund that the Province of Canada took over from the Imperial Government and that fund at Confederation, as you will see by the evidence of Mr. Scott, went to the Dominion and was not confined, as I submit, to the establishment of schools for Indians in any particular province.
-
2,310.
Lamothe v. Daveluy - (1908) 41 SCR 80 - 1908-12-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
The Bank of Toronto v. Le Curé et les Marguilliers de L'Œuvre et Fabrique de la Paroisse de la Nativité de la Sainte Vierge[10]; Toussignant v. County of Nicolet[11]; Leroux v. Parish of Ste. Justine[12]; Noel v. Chevrefils[13]; Waters v. Manigault[14]; Cully v. Ferdais[15]; City of Hull v. Scott & Walters[16]; Jermyn
-
2,311.
SCR | RCS (1908) vol 40 - 1908-10-06
Canada Supreme Court ReportsSee also Attorney-General of Quebec v. Scott (2). Admittedly the river is not navigable. [...] De la jonction Scott jusqu'à la chûte, suite de rapides. Dans l'été, a eau basse, il n'y a de navigable ou de flottable que la partie de St. François a la jonction Scott. [...] The plaintiff's property is between "la jonction Scott" and "la chi te."
-
2,312.
Great Northern Ry. Co. of Canada v. Furness, Withy & Co. - (1908) 40 SCR 455 - 1908-06-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
The Attorney General of Quebec v. Scott (34 Can. S.C.R. 282) and The Halifax Election Cases (37 Can. S.C.R. 601) referred to. [...] The Attorney General of Quebec v. Scott[2], and The Halifax Election Cases.[3] are in point.
-
2,313.
Fraser v. Douglas - (1908) 40 SCR 384 - 1908-06-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsFamily law
Two cases, In re Wildash and Hutchison; Ex parte Miskin[4] in 1877, and Grimish v. Scott[5], indicate conclusions different from what I here reach and are worth noticing by the curious student, but the Australian Act of that time and the Manitoba Act, in the nineties, are in many respects widely different, and not least in
-
2,314.
Ville de St. Jean v. Molleur - (1908) 40 SCR 139 - 1908-03-23
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
It has been held (Attorney-General of Quebec v. Scott[20]) that the appellant cannot be prejudiced by the delay of the court in dealing with an application to allow the security."
-
2,315.
SCR | RCS (1908) vol 39 - 1908-02-18
Canada Supreme Court ReportsMarney v. Scott Marshall n. Crutwell Martin v. Temperley Masterton & Smith n. Mayor of 1 Brooklyn.... ) [...] FENDANT MCGILLIVRAY, (PLAIN- TIFFS) AND M. McGILLIVRAY AND J. W. } DEFENDANTS. SCOTT & SON AND J.T. SCOTT . [...] (6) 3 Scott 265. (3) 4 Price 282. (7) 2 Bing. N.C. 713. (4) 1 M. & G, 279.
-
2,316.
Tanguay v. Canadian Electric Light Co. - (1908) 40 SCR 1 - 1908-02-18
Supreme Court JudgmentsMaritime law
(Beaudry-Lacantinerie, Des Biens, no. 174; Attorney-General of Quebec v. Scott[6]. [...] De la jonction Scott jusqu'à la chûte, suite de rapides. Dans l'été, à eau basse, il n'y a de navigable ou de flottable que la partie de St. François à la jonction Scott. [...] The plaintiff's property is between "la jonction Scott" and "la chûte."
-
2,317.
Union Investment Co. v. Wells - (1908) 39 SCR 625 - 1908-02-18
Supreme Court JudgmentsBills of exchange
No case in England and only the cases of Moore v. Scott[56], and Jennings v. Napanee Brush. [...] It is that in the case of First National Bank of St Paul v. County Commissioners of Scott County[65] it appears the courts of the state where the note, in question here, was transferred, have treated overdue interest as if principal. [...] [45] 3 Scott 265. [46] 2 Bing. N.C. 713. [47] 8 Scott N.R. 147.
-
2,318.
Grand Trunk Ry. Co. v. Robertson - (1907) 39 SCR 506 - 1907-12-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
This view appears to be supported by the decisions in Scott v. Great Western Railway Co.[2]; Allan v. Great Western Railway Co.[3]; Re St. Catharines and Niagara Central Railway Co. v. Barbeau[4]; Toronto Belt Line Railway Co. v. Lauder[5]; and by the language of Burton J., in Bowen v. Canada Southern Railway Co.[6].
-
2,319.
Robinson, Little & Co. v. Scott & Son - (1907) 39 SCR 281 - 1907-06-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsBankruptcy and insolvency
Robinson, Little & Co. v. Scott & Son, (1907) 39 SCR 281 Supreme Court of Canada [...] Robinson, Little & Co. v. Scott & Son, (1907) 39 S.C.R. 281 Date: 1907-06-24 [...] M. McGillivray and J.W. Scott & Son Defendants; and J.W. Scott & Son, (Defendants) (Respondents).
-
2,320.
Scott v. Swanson - (1907) 39 SCR 229 - 1907-06-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
Scott v. Swanson, (1907) 39 SCR 229 Supreme Court of Canada Scott v. Swanson, (1907) 39 S.C.R. 229 [...] Charles Sumner Scott (Defendant) Appellant; and William James Swanson (Defendant) Respondent.
-
2,321.
Valiquette v. Fraser - (1907) 39 SCR 1 - 1907-05-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
That duty, as defined in Indermaur v. Dames6; Francis v. Cockrell[10]; Tarry v. Ashton[11] Marney v. Scott[12], and other cases, seems to be that he is bound towards those whom he invites into or upon the building or structure to use reasonable care and skill in providing that the property and appliances upon it, which it [...] As Sir Frederick Pollock puts it in the 5th edition of his work on Torts, at page 477, adopted by Bigham J. in his judgment in Marney v. Scott[14];
-
2,322.
Andrews v. Calori - (1907) 38 SCR 588 - 1907-05-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
Upon the questions of law involved the following cases are cited ; Newell v. Radford[62]; Hood v. Lord Barrington[63] ; Sale v. Lambert[64] ; Commins v. Scott[65] ; Catling v. King[66] ; Sarl v. Bourdillon[67]; Barkworth v. Young[68] ; Parton v. Crofts[69].
-
2,323.
Baldocchi v. Spada - (1907) 38 SCR 577 - 1907-05-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsBankruptcy and insolvency
Sir William Scott said over a hundred years ago, in the case of The “Odin”[1].
-
2,324.
Conmee v. Securities Holding Co. - (1907) 38 SCR 601 - 1907-05-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsSecurities
Scott & Horton v. Godfrey[15]. THE CHIEF JUSTICE.—As more fully explained by my brother Davies, the plaintiffs (A.E. Ames & Co.), now respondents, allege that on the 28th April, 1902, as stock brokers doing business in Toronto, they were instructed by the defendant, now appellant, to purchase for him in a way [...] Mollett v. Robinson[16] at p. 94; Scott & Horton v. Godfrey[17] at p. 736; Bentinck v. London Joint Stock Bank[18] pp. 120-140-141; Chase v. City of Boston[19]. [...] The case of Scott & Horton v. Godfrey[25], relied on by the learned chancellor at the trial, is quite different from the present.
-
2,325.
SCR | RCS (1907) vol 38 - 1907-05-07
Canada Supreme Court ReportsSee also Taylor & Scott v. Annand(2), per CHATTE&8ON Co. Romer L.J. at p. 136. [...] Sir William Scott said over a hundred years ago, in the case of The "Odin" (1) . [...] ROBINSON, LITTLE & CO, V. SCOTT & dissent in the court appealed from, but SON 490