Advanced Search
- All Databases (1,254)
- Decisions (530)
- Resources (724)
1,254 result(s)
-
151.
Stewart v. Canada - 2002 SCC 46 - [2002] 2 SCR 645 - 2002-05-23
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
In Allen v. The Queen, 99 D.T.C. 968 (T.C.C.), aff’d 2000 D.T.C. 6559 (F.C.A.) (sub nom. [...] As well, various cases have held that the Moldowan test is only applicable where there is some personal element to the taxpayer’s endeavour: Hickman Motors Ltd. v. Canada, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 336, at paras. 69 and 72; Allen, supra; Nichol, supra; Bélec, supra. [...] 59 The comments of Bowman J.T.C.C. in Allen, supra, at paras. 20 and 22, aptly illustrate the problems which result from intermingling the question of the existence of a source of income with the issue of the deductibility of expenses, in particular, interest expenses, and are worth repeating:
-
152.
Long v. Toronto Rway. Co. - (1914) 50 SCR 224 - 1914-06-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
If he had been he would certainly, in view of the speed at which the car was moving at the time, have got safely across, Charles Allen, who saw the accident, says:— [...] The evidence of Charles Allen, apparently an independent witness and the only person other than the motorman who seems to have seen the deceased come upon the track, is as follows:— [...] Assuming the latter to be the correct view, upon the evidence of Charles Allen it is clear that the deceased, after stepping upon the track and an instant or two
-
153.
Judgments in Appeals and Leave Applications / Jugements sur pourvois et demandes d'autorisation - 2001-09-27
News Releases28379 Joel Marchand, a minor by his litigation guardian, Richard Allen Marchand, the said Richard Allen Marchand and Barbara Marchand ‑ v. ‑ Public General Hospital of Chatham (also known as the Public General Hospital), A. Olsen, P. Colebrooke, M. Want and G. Asher (Ont.) (Civil)
-
154.
Brooks v. The King - [1927] SCR 633 - 1927-11-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Misdirection in a material matter having been shown, the onus was upon the Crown to satisfy the court that the jury, charged as it should have been, could not, as reasonable men, have done otherwise than find the appellant guilty (Gouin v. The King, [1926] S.C.R. 539, at p. 543; Allen v. The King, 44 Can. S.C.R. 331, at p. [...] Gouin v. The King[2]; Allen v. The King[3]; Makin v. Att. Gen. for New South Wales[4].
-
155.
News release of July 3, 1998 - 1998-07-03
News Releases1. David Allen Gauthier c. Corporation municipale de la ville de Lac Brôme (Qué.)(25022) [...] 25022 DAVID ALLEN GAUTHIER v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF LAC BRÔME, MARIO BEAUMONT AND ALYRE THIREAULT [...] 25022 DAVID ALLEN GAUTHIER c. CORPORATION MUNICIPALE DE VILLE DE LAC BRÔME, MARIO BEAUMONT ET ALYRE THIREAULT
-
156.
Bulletin of November 18, 1994 - 1994-11-18
BulletinsMockler, Allen & Dixon v. (24398) The Council of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of New Brunswick (N.B.) [...] Allen T. Fletcher et al. D.A. Thurmeier Beaumont, Church v. (24404) [...] Division) (Allen J.) Conviction: 1 count of incest and 2 counts of sexual interference
-
157.
Ross, Banks and Dyson v. The Queen - [1968] SCR 786 - 1968-06-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
In re Betty Loeb Allen[10], Gibson C.J. said, at p. 281: The rules of the game of bridge, which have been established on an international basis, are set forth in encyclopedias and other texts, and we are satisfied from the rules and from the many publications on the subject that the game is predominantly one of skill. [...] On the basis that there must be some chance in every game, as Mr. Murray testified, I am of the opinion that the statements made in the Woolf case, in the D’Orio case, and in the Betty Loeb Allen case support the contention that the predominance of skill in the game of bridge should indicate that it is not properly [...] Indeed in the Betty Loeb Allen case a conviction for permitting an illegal game to be played was quashed by the Supreme Court of California for that exact reason.
-
158.
Bulletin of October 16, 2015 - 2015-10-16
BulletinsShea H. Coulson, Diego A. Solimano and Sacha L. I. Roudette, for the respondents Jamie Allen Chisholm, Scott Roberts and Carol Marion Beam. [...] Shea H. Coulson, Diego A. Solimano et Sacha L. I. Roudette, pour les intimés Jamie Allen Chisholm, Scott Roberts et Carol Marion Beam. [...] Procureurs des intimés Jamie Allen Chisholm, Scott Roberts et Carol Marion Beam : Gudmundseth Mickelson, Vancouver; Carr Buchan & Company, Victoria.
-
159.
Judgments in Appeal and Leave Applications - 2019-11-14
News ReleasesThe motion for an extension of time to serve and file the response to the application for leave to appeal of the respondent, Wayne Allen Gendron, is granted. [...] La requête en prorogation du délai de signification et de dépôt de la réponse à la demande d’autorisation d’appel de l’intimé, Wayne Allen Gendron, est accueillie.
-
160.
Judgments in Leave Applications / Jugements sur demandes d'autorisation - 2002-03-14
News Releases28834 The Crown in right of Alberta, Jim Dixon, Public Service Commissioner of Alberta ‑ v. ‑ Audrey Allen, William Bentley, Faye Chorney, B.C. Desai, Po Y. Fok, Cynthia Formaniuk, Larry Fraser, Cecile Gartner, George Gordon, Joseph Huba, Allen Jones, James Kocyba, Sai‑Bon Lee, Patrick Malcolmson, Donald Maltais, Harold
-
161.
Judgments to be Rendered in Leave Applications - 2012-10-15
News Releases(Allen J.) Motion to set aside a release dismissed. April 21, 2011 [...] (Juge Allen) Motion en annulation de la quittance, rejetée. 21 avril 2011
-
162.
R. v. Brown - [1991] 2 SCR 518 - 1991-06-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Boyle, Kevin and M. J. Allen. Sentencing Law and Practice. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1985. [...] There are other authorities to the same effect: R. v. Speid (1985), 46 C.R. (3d) 22, at p. 47; Boyle and Allen, Sentencing Law and Practice (1985), at pp. 225, 227 and 229; Fox and Freiberg, Sentencing: State and Federal Law in Victoria (1985), at p. 48; Stockdale and Devlin, Stockdale and Devlin on Sentencing (1987), at p.
-
163.
International Timber Co. v. Field - [1928] SCR 564 - 1928-10-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
Rex v. Robertson & Hackett Sawmills Ltd. (38 B.C. Rep. 222) and Compton v. Allen Thrasher Lumber Co. (39 B.C. Rep. 70), so far as they are inconsistent herewith, overruled. [...] ent with this judgment it must be overruled, as must also Compton v. Allen Thrasher Lumber Co. (1).
-
164.
Sankey v. The King - [1927] SCR 436 - 1927-06-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
The Court (reversing judgment of the Court of Appeal of British Columbia [1927] 2 W.W.R. 265) quashed a conviction for murder and granted a new trial, on the ground that the unsworn testimony of a child ten years old was improperly received (Allen v. The King 44 Can. S.C.R. 331 cited), there being no material before the [...] The case falls clearly within the decision of this Court in Allen v. The King[2].
-
165.
Caldwell v. Stadacona Fire and Life Ins. Co. - (1883) 11 SCR 212 - 1883-01-12
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
[6] 3 Allen Mass. 602. [7] 3 Allen, Mass. 602. [8] 4 F. & F. 1086. [...] [19] May on Insurance, 2nd ed. sec 101; Worthington v. Bearse, 12 Allen (Mass) 382. [...] [40] 12 Allen 382.
-
166.
Bulletin of September 14, 2018 - 2018-09-14
BulletinsMichael Dwight Allen et al. v. (36552) Her Majesty the Queen (Ont.) [...] The motion to join the matters of Michael Dwight Allen, Zacky Deleon and Jaime Humberto Restrepo and to permit the filing of a single application for leave to appeal is granted. [...] La requête visant à joindre les instances de Michael Dwight Allen, de Zacky Deleon et de Jaime Humberto Restrepo et à permettre le dépôt d’une seule demande d’autorisation d’appel est accueillie.
-
167.
News release of November 28, 1997 - 1997-11-28
News Releases03/12/97 David Allen Gauthier c. Corporation Municipale de la ville de Lac Brôme (Qué.)(25022) [...] 25022 DAVID ALLEN GAUTHIER v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF LAC BRÔME, MARIO BEAUMONT AND ALYRE THIREAULT (Que.) [...] 25022 DAVID ALLEN GAUTHIER c. CORPORATION MUNICIPALE DE VILLE DE LAC BRÔME, MARIO BEAUMONT ET ALYRE THIREAULT (Qué.)
-
168.
Bickford v. Grand Junction Railway Co. - (1878) 1 SCR 696 - 1878-01-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
Taylor v. Chichester & Sandhurst Railway Co.[20]; Australian S.S. Co. v. Mounsey[21]; Gibbs & West’s Case, Re International Insurance Co.[22]; Re Patent File Co., ex parte Birmingham Banking Co.[23]; Green’s American edition of Brice, p. 127, and the American cases there cited; Allen v. Montgomery Railway Co.[24]; [...] [37] 13 Allen (Mass.), 422. [38] 4 Metcalfe (Ky.), 199. [39] Am. Ed. p. 678, s. 794. [...] [56] 10 Allen, 455. [57] 14 Allen, 386. [58] L.R. 7, H.L., 653. [59] 6 H.L. Cases, 113.
-
169.
Judgments to be Rendered in Appeals / Prochains jugements sur appels - 2009-11-02
News ReleasesRichard Allen Klassen, self‑represented Respondent Kari Klassen, self‑represented Respondent [...] Richard Allen Klassen, intimé non représenté par avocat Kari Klassen, intimée non représentée par avocat
-
170.
Agenda / Ordre du jour - 2000-03-06
News Releases24/03/2000 Harry Cobb and Allen Grossman v. The United States of America [...] 27610 / 27774 HARRY COBB, ALLEN GROSSMAN AND JAMES TSIOUBRIS v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA [...] 27610 / 27774 HARRY COBB, ALLEN GROSSMAN ET JAMES TSIOUBRIS c. LES ÉTATS‑UNIS D’AMÉRIQUE
-
171.
In re Withycombe Estate / Attorney-General of Alberta v. Royal Trust Co. - [1945] SCR 267 - 1945-02-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
It appears that by lease dated the 8th of June, 1918, the deceased granted this property to Allen Brothers for a term of thirty-five years from the 2nd day of November, 1918, the principal material terms of the lease being:— [...] The first dealing of which we are informed is a lease made by Mr. Withycombe to Allen Brothers, Theatre Proprietors, in 1918. [...] By an agreement in writing dated June 8th, 1918, the late Mr. A. G. Withycombe as owner leased this property to Allen Brothers for a period of thirty-five years from the 2nd day of November, 1918.
-
172.
Dedrick v. Ashdown - (1888) 15 SCR 227 - 1888-06-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
Porter v. Flintoff ([11]); Ruttan v. Beamish ([12]); McAulay v. Allen ([13]); Paterson v. Maughan ([14]); and the following which are especially to be considered, Bunker v. Emmany ([15]); Bingham v. Bettinson ([16]); and Whimsell v. Giffard ([17]). [...] In McAulay v. Allen ([26]); and Samuel v. Coulter ([27]), the majority of the Court of Common Pleas at Toronto held themselves to be bound by Porter v. Flintoff so deciding and by Ruttan v. Beamish ([28]), as affirming it. [...] I remain of the opinion which was expressed by me in McAulay v. Allen and Samuel v. Coulter, that the point so assumed to have been decided by Porter v. Flintoff was not at all necessary
-
173.
Commercial Bank of Windsor v. Morrison - (1902) 32 SCR 98 - 1902-02-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsFinancial institutions
Manchester Trust v. Furness[9]; London Joint Stock Bank v. Simmons[10]; Allen v. Seckham[11]; English and Scottish Mercantile Investment Co. v. Brunton[12]. [...] Kettlewell v. Watson[29], per Frye J. at p. 705; Allen v. South Boston Railroad Co.[30].
-
174.
R. v. Jones - [1986] 2 SCR 284 - 1986-10-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
It is settled law in the United States that it is perfectly constitutional for the government to require religious schools to meet a specified standard of efficient instruction: Board of Education of Central School District No. 1 v. Allen, 392 U.S. 236 (1968) at p. 245; Wolman v. Walter, 433 U.S. 229 (1977) at p. 240; [...] Legislation demanding that private schools meet certain minimum educational standards has the secular purpose and effect of ensuring a knowledgeable and competent citizenry: Board of Education of Central School District No. 1 v. Allen, supra, at pp. 245‑47. [...] For example, it has held that the state may provide bus transportation for children to religious schools (Everson v. Board of Education, supra); lend textbooks to religious schools (Board of Education of Central School District No. 1 v. Allen, supra); and reimburse religious schools for expenses incurred in administering
-
175.
Ocean Harvesters Ltd. v. Quinlan Brothers Ltd. - [1975] 1 SCR 684 - 1974-03-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
Lynes v. Snaith, [1899] 1 Q.B. 486; Errington v. Errington, [1952] 1 All E.R. 149; Cobb v. Lane, [1952] 1 All E.R. 1199; Gray v. Richford (1878), 2 S.C.R. 431; Smith v. Lloyd (1854), 9 Ex. 562, 156 E.R. 240; Allen v. England (1862), 3 F. & F. 49; Radiach v. Smith (1959), 101 C.L.R. 209; Wills v. Steer (1907), 9 Nfld. [...] The same thought had been expressed a few years earlier by Erle C.J. in Allen v. England[7], in these words: