Advanced Search
- All Databases (4,782)
- Decisions (2,369)
- Resources (2,169)
4,782 result(s)
-
3,251.
SCR | RCS [1976] vol 1 - 1976-01-01
Canada Supreme Court Reports[ 1976] 1 R.C.S. HATCHWELL C. LA REINE 39 Robert William Hatchwell Appellant; Robert William Hatchwell Appelant; and et Her Majesty The Queen Respondent. [...] Le mémoire du 12 novembre a naturelle-William Hawrelak signed that report. [...] [ 1976] 1 R.C.S. MORGENTAL.ER C. LA REINE Le Juge en Chef 647 Glanville Williams, op. cit., at p. 178 and in R. v. honnête (Voir le passage dans Glanville Williams, Newton and Stungo").
-
3,252.
SCR | RCS [1975] vol 2 - 1975-12-31
Canada Supreme Court ReportsSolicitor for the respondent: William B. Procureur de l'intimée: William B. Purdy, Purdy, Saskatoon. [...] [R. v. Wilkins, [1964] 2 O.R. 365 distinguished; v. Williams, [1953] 1 Q.B. 660, referred to.] [...] William Maurice Thompson Intimé. 1974: June 12; 1974:June 28. 1974: le 12 juin; 1974: le 28 juin.
-
3,253.
Tomko v. Labour Relations Board (N.S.) et al. - [1977] 1 SCR 112 - 1975-12-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsAdministrative law
Constitutional law
William Henkel, Q.C., for the Attorney General of Alberta. The judgment of Laskin C.J. and Martland, Judson, Ritchie, Spence, Pigeon, Dickson and Beetz JJ. was delivered by
-
3,254.
Pajelle Investments Ltd. v. Herbold - [1976] 2 SCR 520 - 1975-11-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsLease
A Mr. William A. Mett from the department of Buildings, City of Toronto was called by the tenant to give evi-
-
3,255.
Fox et al. v. Royal Bank of Canada et al. - [1976] 2 SCR 2 - 1975-10-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsGuarantee and suretyship
Frank B. Fox, Eastern Shore Construction Limited, a body corporate, William H. Jack and Frank B. Fox carrying on business under the firm name and style of Bent Brook Farms, Ford H. Webber, Harpell H. Power and D.D. Lynds Appellants; [...] The essentials of the matter are that one William H. Jack, who had been an employee of Moirs Limited, had become involved in a number of ventures the most prominent of which were Eastern Shore Construction Limited and Dolphin Industries Limited, all of which dealt with the Royal Bank of Canada through Jack. [...] to the aforesaid judgments, such appellant would be entitled to an order for contribution as against the third parties Dolphin Industries Limited and Bentley and Archibald Limited and as against the other appellants, and to an order for indemnity as against the third parties Dolphin Holdings Limited and William H. Jack.
-
3,256.
Hodgins v. Hydro-Electric Commission of Nepean - [1976] 2 SCR 501 - 1975-10-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
This finding is based upon the evidence given at trial by Mr. Runions and also by Mr. William L. Scott, a professional engineer and the manager of the Ontario Electrical League.
-
3,257.
Hudson v. Benallack - [1976] 2 SCR 168 - 1975-10-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsBankruptcy and insolvency
The year after the decision in In re Webb Sir William Mulock C.J. Ex., in Burns v. Royal Bank of Canada[13], reached the opposite conclusion, holding that to constitute a fraudulent preference there must be present two circumstances: a preference in fact and an intention on the part of the debtor to prefer. [...] But a proviso in these words was not carried forward into the later English Bankruptcy Act of 1883 and such a proviso has never formed part of the Canadian Bankruptcy Act. According to Williams on Bankruptcy, 18th ed., p. 382: “...the introduction of the concluding words in the 1883 Act restored the common law rule, with [...] And though there may not have been any express decision on the point upon this legislation in this Court the late Chief Justice, Sir William Ritchie, in Gibbons v. McDonald, at page 589 indicates that in his view there must be
-
3,258.
McMillan v. Pawluk et al. - [1976] 2 SCR 789 - 1975-10-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsMotor vehicles
William Pawluk Respondent; and John Meier and Jim’s Express & Transfer Ltd. and Other Related Actions Respondents. [...] Patrick Shewchuk, for the appellant, William Pawluk. John A, Hustwick, for the appellants, Anker Liboriussen and Antonius Schilder. [...] Solicitors for the appellant, William Pawluk: Bassie, Shewchuk & Co., Edmonton.
-
3,259.
Stein et al. v. ‘Kathy K’ et al. (The Ship) - [1976] 2 SCR 802 - 1975-10-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Transportation
Marjorie Hexter Stein (now known as Marjorie Hexter Cowley) for herself and as the Widow of Charles Simmon Stein, Deceased, and as a co-executrix of the Estate of the said Deceased, and Maurice Schwarz and William I. Stein, co-executors of the said Estate (Plaintiffs) Appellants;
-
3,260.
Morgan et al. v. A.G. (P.E.I.) et al. - [1976] 2 SCR 349 - 1975-06-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
William Henkel, Q.C., for the intervenant, the Attorney General of Alberta.
-
3,261.
R. v. Kundeus - [1976] 2 SCR 272 - 1975-06-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Williams, Criminal Law, 2nd ed. (1961), p. 129, makes the point when dealing with the question of “transferred malice” as follows: [...] A number of authors who have examined this problem in depth and, particularly in relation to the “lesser crime” doctrine, have come to this very conclusion: see Williams, op. cit., at pp. 185 ff., Howard, Australian Criminal Law, 2nd ed.
-
3,262.
Rilling v. The Queen - [1976] 2 SCR 183 - 1975-06-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
3. Evidence for the Crown was given by the arresting officer, Constable William Hargarten of the Edmonton City Police, who stated inter alia that the accused blew into the breathalyzer machine and that he did not recall who was the operator of the machine. [...] Joseph William McHarg, (unreported, a copy of [Page 186] which is attached) I allowed the said Certificate to be admitted as evidence.
-
3,263.
Nova Scotia Board of Censors v. McNeil - [1976] 2 SCR 265 - 1975-05-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsAction
Bruce J. Preeper, and William M. Wilson, for the appellants. Robert Murrant, and Dereck M. Jones, for the respondent.
-
3,264.
Red Deer College v. Michaels - [1976] 2 SCR 324 - 1975-05-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsEducation law
Labour law
Marion Rose Michaels and William Francis Finn (Plaintiffs) Respondents.
-
3,265.
Paskivski v. Canadian Pacific Ltd. - [1976] 1 SCR 687 - 1975-04-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Canadian Pacific Limited (formerly known as Canadian Pacific Railway Company), Wilfred Cook, Charles Marsden, William Pederson and Nestor Stanko (Defendants) Respondents;
-
3,266.
McGavin Toastmaster Ltd. v. Ainscough - [1976] 1 SCR 718 - 1975-04-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
The plaintiff William H. Lilly, a jobber, and the plaintiffs Sara Bourne, Arlene Comber, Betty Klassen and Worthy Margaret Nicol, regular part-time employees, are not entitled to benefits under the clauses of the collective agreement invoked.
-
3,267.
Morgentaler v. The Queen - [1976] 1 SCR 616 - 1975-03-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Glanville Williams, op. cit., at p. 178 and in R. v. Newton and Stungo[11]). [...] Williams, Criminal Law, (2nd ed. 1961) takes a more liberal view saying (at p. 724) that notwithstanding the doubts expressed by others, "it will be here submitted somewhat confidently that the defence is recognized in English law". [...] In his review of the authorities, Williams asserts that in most of them that have recognized the defence the act was done to preserve life.
-
3,268.
Montana et al. v. Les développements du Saguenay Ltée et al. - [1977] 1 SCR 32 - 1975-03-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsInternational law
Lister v. McAnulty, [1944] S.C.R. 317; Martin v. William Casey & Sons, Inc. (1958), 170 N.Y.S. 2d 228; Rolland v. La Caisse d’Économie N.-D. de Québec (1895), 24 S.C.R. 405; Breckenridge Speedway v. The Queen, [1970] S.C.R. 175, 9 D.L.R. (3d) 142, referred to. [...] This difficulty does not arise with respect to the case cited by Mr. Sutro: Martin v. William Casey & Sons, Inc.[3], the complete text of which is available.
-
3,269.
Marcoulx And Solomon v. The Queen - [1976] 1 SCR 763 - 1975-03-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Additionally, as Professor Glanville Williams has observed in 1963 Criminal Law Review, pp. 479, 480: [...] As Professor Williams notes in the article to which I have referred, p. 481:
-
3,270.
Hawrelak v. City of Edmonton - [1976] 1 SCR 387 - 1975-03-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
William Hawrelak (Defendant) Appellant; and The City of Edmonton (Plaintiff) Respondent. [...] The respondent, the City of Edmonton, had sued the appellant, William Hawrelak, for profits which he had obtained upon the sale of certain shares in the Sun-Alta Builders Limited and for damages. [...] The appellant then left the city and during his absence, and without any instructions from him, so the appellant testified, the document was executed on behalf of the city by William Mitchell, the acting mayor.
-
3,271.
Attorney General of Canada et al. v. Canard - [1976] 1 SCR 170 - 1975-01-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Courts
The Attorney General of Canada and William Barber Rees (Defendants) Appellants; [...] (a) A Declaratory Judgment declaring the Defendant, William Barber Rees, to be the lawful Administrator of the estate of Alexander Canard, deceased; [...] Solicitor for the plaintiff, respondent: William Rachman, Winnipeg. [1] [1972] 5 W.W.R. 678, 30 D.L.R. (3d) 9.
-
3,272.
Jackson v. Millar - [1976] 1 SCR 225 - 1975-01-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsMotor vehicles
William Millar, an Infant Under the Age of Twenty-one Years, by His Guardian ad litem, Murray Millar, and the Said Murray Millar (Defendants) Respondents. [...] Mr. Justice Osler had found that the negligence of the defendant William Millar was gross negligence and that the infant plaintiff, Bradley Charles Jackson, had, by his negligence to the extent of ten per cent contributed to his injuries, and he therefore gave judgment for the infant plaintiff for $223,785.07 and for the [...] Three youths, the infant plaintiff Bradley Charles Jackson, the infant defendant William Millar, and a third, Ross T. Sanders, were, at the time of the accident, riding in an automobile owned by the adult defendant, Murray Millar, and driven by the infant defendant, William Millar.
-
3,273.
O’Neill et al. v. O’Neill et al. - [1976] 1 SCR 588 - 1975-01-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
(2) William Patrick O’Neill was also the father of Thomas John O’Neill, who was the father of defendant-respondents; [...] From this appellants conclude that this difference between the texts represents a difference of intent, and that the right Thomas O’Neill conferred on his legatee William Patrick, to choose between his children, was not conferred on the said William Patrick by Bridget Martin O’Neill. [...] If so, her trust was justified in the case of her son William Patrick, who left the property to one of his sons.
-
3,274.
Penvidic v. International Nickel - [1976] 1 SCR 267 - 1975-01-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
Torts
‘If in the contract one finds the time limited within which the builder is to do the work, that means, not only that he is to do it within that time, but it means also that he is to have that time within which to do it.’ (Per Vaughan Williams L.J. in Wells v. Army & Navy Co‑operative Society (1902) 86 L.T. 764; Hudson’s
-
3,275.
SCR | RCS [1975] vol 1 - 1975-01-01
Canada Supreme Court ReportsWilliam Henkel, Q.C., for the intervenant, the Attorney General for Alberta. [...] William Henkel, c.r., pour l'intervenant, le Procureur général de l'Alberta. [...] William Henkel, Q.C., for the intervenant, the William Henkel, c.r., pour l'intervenant, le Attorney General for Alberta.