Advanced Search
- All Databases (2,511)
- Decisions (1,094)
- Resources (1,417)
2,511 result(s)
-
1,826.
Rothman v. The Queen - [1981] 1 SCR 640 - 1981-03-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Scott T. Milloy, for the appellant. E.G. Ewaschuk, Q.C., and J.A. Pethes, for the respondent. [...] The fact that Constable Munn said to Sergeant Scott in the presence of the appellant that the old man has regained consciousness and will be able to identify his assailants,—although untrue, and might induce a sense of fear in the appellant, would not render the statement inadmissible. [...] Solicitor for the appellant: Scott T. Milloy, Ottawa. Solicitor for the respondent: R. Tassé, Ottawa.
-
1,827.
Pettkus v. Becker - [1980] 2 SCR 834 - 1980-12-18
Supreme Court JudgmentsTrust
(See A.W. Scott, “Constructive Trusts”, (1955), 71 L.Q.R. 39; Leonard Pollock, “Matrimonial Property and Trusts: The Situation from Murdoch to Rathwell”, (1978), 16 Alberta Law Review 357). [...] This applies especially to the notion that resulting and constructive trusts run together and the amalgam is an equitable remedy: see e.g. A.W. Scott (1955) 71 L.Q.R. 39.
-
1,828.
SCR | RCS [1980] vol 2 - 1980-12-18
Canada Supreme Court ReportsProfessor Frank Scott noted in (1934), 12 et c'est le critère de John Stuart Mill. [...] (See A.W. Scott, "Constructive Trusts", (1955), 71 L.Q.R. 39; Leonard Pollock, "Matrimonial Property and Trusts: The Situation from Murdoch to Rathwell", (1978), 16 Alberta Law Review 357). [...] This applies especially to the notion that resulting and constructive trusts run together and the amalgam is an equitable remedy: see e.g. A.W. Scott (1955) 71 L.Q.R. 39.
-
1,829.
Attorney General of British Columbia v. Canada Trust Co. et al. - [1980] 2 SCR 466 - 1980-06-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Professor Frank Scott noted in (1934), 12 Can. Bar. Rev. 303, at p. 305, that this restating of the ratio decidendi in the Fairbanks case amounted to a virtual overruling and commented: “Henceforth it appears that the question of what the tax was universally considered to be in 1867 is irrelevant.” In Atlantic Smoke Shops
-
1,830.
R. v. Dubois - [1980] 2 SCR 21 - 1980-06-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Lorne Scott, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by
-
1,831.
SCR | RCS [1980] vol 1 - 1980-06-19
Canada Supreme Court ReportsDavid W. Scott, for the Owner, Robert A. David W. Scott, pour le propriétaire, Robert A. Lalonde, in Trust. [...] Solicitors for the Owner, Robert A. Lalonde, in Trust: Scott & Aylen, Ottawa. [...] Procureurs du propriétaire, Robert A. Lalonde, en fiducie: Scott & Aylen, Ottawa.
-
1,832.
Four B Manufacturing v. United Garmet Workers - [1980] 1 SCR 1031 - 1979-12-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Labour law
Ian Scott, Q.C., and Harry Freedman, for the respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board. [...] Solicitors for the respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board: Cameron, Brewin & Scott, Toronto.
-
1,833.
SCR | RCS [1979] vol 2 - 1979-12-13
Canada Supreme Court ReportsSolicitors for the appellant: Scott & Aylen, Ottawa. Solicitor for the respondent: John E. Hall, Vancouver. [...] Procureurs de l'appelant: Scott & Aylen, Ottawa. Procureur de l'intimée: John E. Hall, Vancou-ver. [...] Solicitors for the appellant H.Q. Golder & Associates Limited: Scott & Aylen, Ottawa.
-
1,834.
Clark et al. v. Royal Bank of Canada - [1980] 1 SCR 177 - 1979-11-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsProfessional law
Solicitors for the respondent: Hanson, Hashey & Scott, Fredericton.
-
1,835.
Fraser-Reid v. Droumtsekas - [1980] 1 SCR 720 - 1979-11-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
1 All E.R. 462; Miller v. Cannon Hill Estates, Ltd., [1931] 2 K.B. 113; Hoskins v. Woodham, [1938] 1 All E.R. 692; Croft v. Prendergast, [1949] O.R. 282; Scott-Polson v. Hope (1958), 14 D.L.R. (2d) 333; Smith v. Melançon, [1976] 4 W.W.R. 9; Schipper v. Levitt & Sons Inc., 207 A. 2d 314 (1965, S.C. of New Jersey); [...] See also, Croft v. Prendergast[6]; Scott‑Polson v. Hope[7]; and Smith v. Melançon[8].
-
1,836.
Olympic Towers Ltd. v. Shervale Developments Inc. et al. - [1980] 1 SCR 142 - 1979-10-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
David W. Scott, for the Owner, Robert A. Lalonde, in Trust. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by [...] Solicitors for the Owner, Robert A. Lalonde, in Trust: Scott & Aylen, Ottawa.
-
1,837.
McCauley v. McVey et al. - [1980] 1 SCR 165 - 1979-06-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
Solicitors for the appellant: Scott & Aylen, Ottawa. Solicitors for the respondent McVey: Weir & Foulds, Toronto.
-
1,838.
LePage Ltd. v. March et al. - [1979] 2 SCR 155 - 1979-06-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
Property law
Ian G. Scott, for the other respondents. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by
-
1,839.
Canadian Laboratory Supplies v. Engelhard Industries - [1979] 2 SCR 787 - 1979-05-08
Supreme Court JudgmentsAgency
Torts
It was Cook who called back later that day, telling Scott he was asked to speak [...] Cook undertook to make enquiries to answer Scott’s question and to call back but never did. [...] This testimony is corroborated by the evidence given by Scott, the President of Engelhard, who stated:
-
1,840.
SCR | RCS [1979] vol 1 - 1979-05-01
Canada Supreme Court Reports[1979] 1 S.C.R. Procureurs de l'appelant: Cameron, Brewin & Scott, Toronto. [...] The two cases are Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. Humberto Pagan Hernandez5 and Scott v. Vardy6. [...] L'arrêt Scott c. Vardy, précité, traite également de la Loi sur l'extradition.
-
1,841.
Bell v. R. - [1979] 2 SCR 212 - 1979-04-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
Re Howard v. City of Toronto (1927), 61 O.L.R. 563; Kruse v. Johnson, [1898] 2 Q.B. 91; Scott v. Pilliner, [1904] 2 K.B. 855; Mixnam’s Properties Ltd. v. Chertsey Urban District Council, [1964] 1 Q.B. 214 applied.] [...] His Honour Judge Hogg accepted this submission, and in doing so considered several cases to which I shall refer hereafter, adopting the principle set out in Kruse v. Johnson[3], Scott v. Pilliner[4], as further considered in Mixnam’s Properties Ltd. v. Chertsey Urban District Council[5], and concluded:
-
1,842.
Hunt v. The Queen - [1979] 2 SCR 73 - 1979-03-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Solicitors for the appellant: Scott & Aylen, Ottawa. Solicitor for the respondent: John E. Hall, Vancouver.
-
1,843.
Papalia v. R. - [1979] 2 SCR 256 - 1979-03-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Evidence
“It is plain that Scott, L.J. had in mind the old rule that a party must produce the best evidence that the nature of the case will allow, and that any less good evidence is to be excluded.
-
1,844.
N.C.C. et al. v. Pugliese et al. - [1979] 2 SCR 104 - 1979-02-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Torts
Solicitors for the appellant H.Q. Golder & Associates Limited: Scott & Aylen, Ottawa.
-
1,845.
Brule v. Plummer - [1979] 2 SCR 343 - 1979-01-23
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
Solicitors for the appellants: Scott & Aylen, Ottawa. Solicitors for the respondents: Wentzell, Gautreau & Roine, Ottawa.
-
1,846.
Bradburn v. Wentworth Arms Hotel - [1979] 1 SCR 846 - 1978-12-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
Ian Scott, Q.C., and G.G. Paliare, for the appellants. Claude Thomson, Q.C., and Gavin MacKenzie, for the respondents. [...] Solicitors for the appellants: Cameron, Brewin & Scott, Toronto. Solicitors for the respondents: Campbell, Godfrey & Lewtas, Toronto.
-
1,847.
Olympic Towers Ltd. v. Sherman et al. - [1979] 1 SCR 883 - 1978-12-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Solicitors for Robert A. Lalonde: Cameron, Brewing & Scott, Toronto.
-
1,848.
SCR | RCS [1978] vol 2 - 1978-12-20
Canada Supreme Court ReportsThis amendment confirmed as law the view expressed by Scott J. in Choma. [...] Cette modification a incorporé dans la Loi l'opinion exprimée par le juge Scott dans Choma. [...] "Economic loss" may be ephe-[dans Scott] ne suggère une opinion différente.
-
1,849.
Cherneskey v. Armadale Publishers Ltd. - [1979] 1 SCR 1067 - 1978-11-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
It is to be noted also that Scott L.J. limited his opinion to cases where there was "an absence of special [...] In the course of his judgment, Scott L.J. made some significant comments on the publication of letters by newspapers, pp. 318-20: [...] Understood in this way, Scott L.J's statement fits well with his other comments as well as previous authority.
-
1,850.
Herman et al. v. Deputy Attorney General (Canada) - [1979] 1 SCR 729 - 1978-10-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
606; St. Hilaire v. Lambert (1909), 42 S.C.R. 264; Godson v. The Corporation of the City of Toronto (1890), 18 S.C.R. 36; Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. Hernandez, [1975] 1 S.C.R. 228; Re Sproule (1886), 12 S.C.R. 140; R. v. Northumberland Ferries Ltd., [1945] S.C.R. 458; Scott v. Vardy, [1977] 1 S.C.R. 293 referred to.] [...] The two cases are Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. Humberto Pagan Hernandez[5] and Scott v. Vardy[6]. [...] Scott v. Vardy, supra, was also a decision under the Extradition Act. There one of the questions was whether the magistrate, a provincial appointee, who took depositions under the Act was, like the Judge in the Hernandez case, amenable to the reviewing authority of the Federal Court of Appeal as a persona designata.