Advanced Search
- All Databases (2,511)
- Decisions (1,094)
- Resources (1,417)
2,511 result(s)
-
2,326.
Copeland-Chatterson Co. v. Paquette - (1907) 38 SCR 451 - 1907-04-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsIntellectual property
idea; per Rigby L.J. in Fawcett v. Homan[16], at p. 410; See also Taylor & Scott v. Armand[17], per Romer L.J. at p. 136. [...] v. Miller[25]; Reynolds v. Herbert Smith & Co.[26]; Smith v. Goldie[27], per Gwynne J. at pages 69, 71; Dansereau v. Bellemare[28]; Thomson v. American Braided Wire Co.[29]; Anti-vibration Electric Co. v. Crossley[30]; Ashworth v. The English Clothing Co.[31]; Taylor & Scott v. Annand[32]; Heugh v. Chamberlain[33],
-
2,327.
Robinson, Little & Co. v. Scott & Son - (1907) 38 SCR 490 - 1907-04-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Robinson, Little & Co. v. Scott & Son, (1907) 38 SCR 490 Supreme Court of Canada [...] Robinson, Little & Co. v. Scott & Son, (1907) 38 S.C.R. 490 Date: 1907-04-02 [...] M. McGillivray and J.W. Scott & Son (Defendants); and J.W. Scott & Son (Defendants) Respondents.
-
2,328.
City of Hamilton v. Hamilton Distillery Co. - (1907) 38 SCR 239 - 1907-02-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Solicitors for the respondents, Hamilton Brewing Association: J.J. Scott.
-
2,329.
Dodge v. The King - (1906) 38 SCR 149 - 1906-12-15
Supreme Court JudgmentsExpropriation
“G”—Scott or Saml. Chipman (Nov.27th, 1902) 1 20.00 “H”—Fanning lot (Dec. 30th, 1902)
-
2,330.
The Canadian Pacific Railway Com. v. The King - (1906) 38 SCR 211 - 1906-12-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsMaritime law
Solicitors for the appellants: Scott & Curle. Solicitor for the respondent: E. L. Newcombe.
-
2,331.
SCR | RCS (1906) vol 37 - 1906-11-22
Canada Supreme Court Reports(2) Scott Cas. Int. Law, 874; (3) 9 B. & C. 446. 390 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA. [VOL.. [...] Attorney-General y. Scott (1) ; 1906 City of Hull y. Scott(2), at p. 171; Bell v. Corpora- ATTY.-GEN. oFQUEBEo tion of Quebec(3).* V. FBASEB Flynn S.C. for the respondents. [...] ATTY.-GEN. OF QUEBEC son v. Hurdran (3 ), pp. 59-69; Attorney-General v. V. Scott (4) , at p. 615; Leboutillier y. Hogan (5) .
-
2,332.
Attorney-General of Quebec v. Fraser / Attorney-General of Quebec v. Adams - (1906) 37 SCR 577 - 1906-10-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
Attorney-General v. Scott([21]); City of Hull v. Scott([22]), at p. 171; Bell v. Corporation of Quebec([23]).The arguments in respect to making the respondent Adams a party are not mentioned as the question is not discussed in the judgment now reported. [...] Plocque, Nos. 4 and 5; 1 Gaudry, Traité du Domaine ([26]), No. 121; 14 Bequet, "Eaux," Nos. 567/574, 575; 2 Beaudrillart, "Eaux et Forêts,' p. 739; 2 Daviel, p. 23; 3 Proudhon, pp. 726, 727; 3 Proudhon, Nos. 857, 859, 860; Bell v. Corporation of Quebec([27]); Thompson v. Hurdman([28]), pp. 59-69; Attorney-General v. Scott [...] En effet, une rivière comme la rivière Saint-Charles, qui une fois ou deux pendant Tannée ,dans les plus hautes marées lorsque le volume de ses eaux sera considérablement augmenté par la fonte des neiges du printemps ou les pluies abond-' antes de l'automne, permettra à un bateau de se rendre jusqu'au pont de Scott,
-
2,333.
The Ship "North" v. The King - (1906) 37 SCR 385 - 1906-04-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsInternational law
pp. 292 to 302; Westlake International Law, pp. 172-4; The "Interpretation Act," R.S.C. ch. 1, sec. 7, par. 37; The "Marianna Flora"[16];" 59 Geo. III. ch. 38, sec. 2; Oppenheim International Law, p. 321; Hall International Law (5 ed.) 256; Cobbett's Leading Cases on International Law, p. 344; Reg. v. Scott[17]. [...] [16] Scott Cas. Int. Law, 874; 11 Wheaton 1. [17] 9 B. & C. 446. [18] 4 Q.B.D. 614.
-
2,334.
Polushie v. Zacklynski - (1906) 37 SCR 177 - 1906-02-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
If I had been in his place (Scott J.) my findings would have been of a similar character. [...] The study I have given to the evidence convinces me that the trial judge, Scott, J., was right in his conclusion that these Galician peasants
-
2,335.
Dominion Cotton Mills Co. v. Trecothic Marsh Commissioners - (1905) 37 SCR 79 - 1905-12-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsStatutes
Attorney-General v. Scott[7]; Couture v. Bouchard[8]; Danaher v. Peters[9]; St. James Election Case[10]; The Queen v. Justices of County of London[11]. [...] The appellants were within their rights when they applied within the six months, and if the judge chose to keep the case before him after that period, either one day, or several days, or several weeks, or several months, the appellants should not suffer for it, as was held in the Attorney-General v. Scott (1):
-
2,336.
SCR | RCS (1905) vol 36 - 1905-11-29
Canada Supreme Court ReportsThis doctrine is of course well recognized in such cases as Gorris v. Scott (2) ; Buxton v. North Eastern Railway Co. (3) ; Vanderkar v. The Rensselaer and Saratoga Railroad Co. (4). [...] The case was tried before Sifton C.J. who gave judgment for the plaintiff and this judgment was affirmed on appeal by the Supreme Court of the Territories, Scott J. dissenting. [...] H. J. Scott K.C. for the appellants cited Murray v. East India Co. (1) .
-
2,337.
Canadian Pacific Ry. Co. v. Eggleston - (1905) 36 SCR 641 - 1905-11-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
APPEAL from the judgment of the Supreme Court of the North-West Territories affirming the decision of Mr. Justice Scott, at the trial, which maintained the plaintiffs' action with costs.
-
2,338.
SCR | RCS (1905) vol 35 - 1905-10-26
Canada Supreme Court ReportsScott v. Brown . Scranton Electric Light & Heat Co., in ye Seaton v. Burnand . . [...] (5) 8 Scott N. R. 384. (3) 7 A. & E. 124. (6) 11 U. C. Q. B. 246. 22% [...] Iy adopt the language of Lord Justice Lindley in Scott v. Brown (1) at p. 728.
-
2,339.
Wentworth Election Case (Sealey v. Smith) - (1905) 36 SCR 497 - 1905-10-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsElections
The statute which enacted that "every conveyance" in a particular form should be valid would not cure a defective title; Ward v. Scott[15]; Whidborne v. Ecclesiastical Commissioners[16]; Forbes v. Ecclesiastical Commissioners for England[17].
-
2,340.
McVity v. Tranouth - (1905) 36 SCR 455 - 1905-06-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsAction
H.J. Scott K.C. for the appellants cited Murray v. East India Co.[2]
-
2,341.
Hulbert v. Peterson - (1905) 36 SCR 324 - 1905-06-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
The case was tried before Sifton C.J. who gave judgment for the plaintiff and this judgment was affirmed on appeal by the Supreme Court of the Territories, Scott J. dissenting.
-
2,342.
Grand Trunk Railway Co. of Canada v. Hainer - (1905) 36 SCR 180 - 1905-05-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
This doctrine is of course well recognized in such cases as Gorris v. Scott[13]; Buxton v. North Eastern Railway Co.[14]; Vanderkar v. The Rensselaer and Saratoga Railroad Co.[15].
-
2,343.
Pearson v. Carpenter - (1904) 35 SCR 380 - 1904-12-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsAgency
I adopt the language of Lord Justice Lindley in Scott v. Brown[13] at p. 728.
-
2,344.
Coote v. Borland - (1904) 35 SCR 282 - 1904-11-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
I would refer to Washburn on Real Property (6 ed.), 2316-2321; Hunt on Boundaries and Fences (5 ed.), 220-1; Loomis v. Jackson,[8]; Glass v. Hulbers[9]; Plant v. Bourne[10]; Shore v. Wilson[11]; Cowen v. Truefitt[12]; Hutchins v. Scott[13]. [...] In that view the case was one for the application of the maxim falsa demontratio non norel, and the conclusion was supported by such cases as Blague v. Gold[17]; Shore v. Wilson[18]; Miller v. Travers[19]; Hutchins v. Scott[20] ; and Doed.
-
2,345.
North British Canadian Investment Co. v. School Trustees of St. John District, No. 16, N.W.T. - (1904) 35 SCR 461 - 1904-11-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
We rely upon the authorities cited by the judges of the court below on the reference and the remarks of Mr. Justice Scott In re Kerr ([11]).
-
2,346.
Sandon Water Works & Light Co. v. Byron N. White Co. - (1904) 35 SCR 309 - 1904-11-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsAction
[20] 8 Scott. N. R. 384. [21] 11 U. C. Q. B. 246. [22] 9 Ch. App. 221.
-
2,347.
SCR | RCS (1904) vol 34 - 1904-05-11
Canada Supreme Court ReportsSolicitors for the respondents : Lemaistre & Scott. (1) [1897] A. C. 358. [...] Scott v. Bould (6). The provisions of this law were not complied with. [...] SCOTT. -- — — — — 603 (Leave to appeal to Privy Council granted, July, 1904.)
-
2,348.
The King v. The "Kitty D." - (1904) 34 SCR 673 - 1904-05-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsFishery
"It has been well said by Judge Black of the Quebec Admiralty Court that 'statements as to time and distance in maritime cases are probably more or less erroneous.' And Sir Wm. Scott when dealing with the evidence of estimated distances at sea in the case of the 'Twee Gebroeders'[1] at page 163 says: 'An exact measurement [...] For, as Sir William Scott afterwards said[3] on page 338: 'It is scarcely necessary to observe that a claim of territory is of a most sacred nature.
-
2,349.
Wood v. LeBlanc - (1904) 34 SCR 627 - 1904-05-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
See Cunard v. Irvine[10]; Doe d. Baxter v. Baxter[11]; Ferrier v. Moodie[12]; Dundas v. Johnston[13]; Davis v. Henderson[14]; Mulholland v. Conklin[15]; Heyland v. Scott[16]; Harris v. Mudie[17].
-
2,350.
Attorney General for Quebec & City of Hull v. Scott et al. - (1904) 34 SCR 603 - 1904-04-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
Attorney General for Quebec & City of Hull v. Scott et al., (1904) 34 SCR 603 [...] Attorney General and City of Hull v. Scott, (1904) 34 SCR 603 Date: 1904-04-27 [...] JANET LOUISA SCOTT AND OTHERS (DEFENDANTS) Respondents. 1904: March 30; 1904: April 27